Morgan Rose, Sara Vogrin, Elise A Mitri, Joseph De Luca, Daniel Lapirow, Gemma K Reynolds, Rebecca Hall, Kerryn McInnes, Fiona James, Irvin Ng, Richard Sullivan, Michael Lane, Amy Legg, Ana Copaescu, Michelle S Goh, Kyra Y L Chua, Natasha E Holmes, Jason A Trubiano
{"title":"Feasibility Trial of Prolonged versus Single-Dose Challenge in Penicillin Allergy.","authors":"Morgan Rose, Sara Vogrin, Elise A Mitri, Joseph De Luca, Daniel Lapirow, Gemma K Reynolds, Rebecca Hall, Kerryn McInnes, Fiona James, Irvin Ng, Richard Sullivan, Michael Lane, Amy Legg, Ana Copaescu, Michelle S Goh, Kyra Y L Chua, Natasha E Holmes, Jason A Trubiano","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of prolonged (i.e., multidose) compared with single-dose amoxicillin challenge in patients with a history of delayed penicillin allergy and to assess the frequency of immune-mediated adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter randomized feasibility trial at four Australian hospitals. Adults who had a history of penicillin allergy of delayed-onset (2 or more hours after exposure) or unknown timing and had tolerated a single-dose oral challenge to amoxicillin were eligible to enroll. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using a permuted block design to either a 5-day amoxicillin challenge (intervention) or a placebo (control). The primary outcome measures were adherence to the intervention (N, % taking at least 80% of capsules), need for unblinding (N, %), and recruitment feasibility (N, % of eligible patients enrolled). The secondary outcome measures included positive oral challenges, defined as immune-mediated adverse events up to and including day 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 302 adults and randomly assigned 120 participants to intervention (n=60) or control (n=60). The mean (standard deviation) age was 49.4 years (17.6). Allergy histories included 42% (50/120) delayed reactions and 58% (70/120) of unknown timing. Adherence to the intervention was 83% (100/120; 95% confidence interval, 75 to 90) (88% intervention and 78% control). No patients were unblinded and recruitment feasibility was 71% (120/169). The number of positive oral challenges was 7 of 60 (12%) in the intervention group and 3 of 60 (5%) in the control group (risk difference, 6.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -3.2 to 16.5). One serious adverse event (1/60, 1.7%, severe cutaneous adverse reaction) was observed in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conducting a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of single-dose versus multidose oral amoxicillin challenge was feasible. A fully powered efficacy trial is needed to assess between-group differences in immune-mediated adverse events. (Funded by Austin Health and others; trial registration: ANZCTR - ACTRN12623001242617, registered on November 30, 2023.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"5 3","pages":"EVIDoa2500038"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2500038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of prolonged (i.e., multidose) compared with single-dose amoxicillin challenge in patients with a history of delayed penicillin allergy and to assess the frequency of immune-mediated adverse events.
Methods: We conducted a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter randomized feasibility trial at four Australian hospitals. Adults who had a history of penicillin allergy of delayed-onset (2 or more hours after exposure) or unknown timing and had tolerated a single-dose oral challenge to amoxicillin were eligible to enroll. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using a permuted block design to either a 5-day amoxicillin challenge (intervention) or a placebo (control). The primary outcome measures were adherence to the intervention (N, % taking at least 80% of capsules), need for unblinding (N, %), and recruitment feasibility (N, % of eligible patients enrolled). The secondary outcome measures included positive oral challenges, defined as immune-mediated adverse events up to and including day 7.
Results: We screened 302 adults and randomly assigned 120 participants to intervention (n=60) or control (n=60). The mean (standard deviation) age was 49.4 years (17.6). Allergy histories included 42% (50/120) delayed reactions and 58% (70/120) of unknown timing. Adherence to the intervention was 83% (100/120; 95% confidence interval, 75 to 90) (88% intervention and 78% control). No patients were unblinded and recruitment feasibility was 71% (120/169). The number of positive oral challenges was 7 of 60 (12%) in the intervention group and 3 of 60 (5%) in the control group (risk difference, 6.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -3.2 to 16.5). One serious adverse event (1/60, 1.7%, severe cutaneous adverse reaction) was observed in the control group.
Conclusions: Conducting a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of single-dose versus multidose oral amoxicillin challenge was feasible. A fully powered efficacy trial is needed to assess between-group differences in immune-mediated adverse events. (Funded by Austin Health and others; trial registration: ANZCTR - ACTRN12623001242617, registered on November 30, 2023.).