Feasibility Trial of Prolonged versus Single-Dose Challenge in Penicillin Allergy.

IF 11.6
NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-24 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2500038
Morgan Rose, Sara Vogrin, Elise A Mitri, Joseph De Luca, Daniel Lapirow, Gemma K Reynolds, Rebecca Hall, Kerryn McInnes, Fiona James, Irvin Ng, Richard Sullivan, Michael Lane, Amy Legg, Ana Copaescu, Michelle S Goh, Kyra Y L Chua, Natasha E Holmes, Jason A Trubiano
{"title":"Feasibility Trial of Prolonged versus Single-Dose Challenge in Penicillin Allergy.","authors":"Morgan Rose, Sara Vogrin, Elise A Mitri, Joseph De Luca, Daniel Lapirow, Gemma K Reynolds, Rebecca Hall, Kerryn McInnes, Fiona James, Irvin Ng, Richard Sullivan, Michael Lane, Amy Legg, Ana Copaescu, Michelle S Goh, Kyra Y L Chua, Natasha E Holmes, Jason A Trubiano","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2500038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of prolonged (i.e., multidose) compared with single-dose amoxicillin challenge in patients with a history of delayed penicillin allergy and to assess the frequency of immune-mediated adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter randomized feasibility trial at four Australian hospitals. Adults who had a history of penicillin allergy of delayed-onset (2 or more hours after exposure) or unknown timing and had tolerated a single-dose oral challenge to amoxicillin were eligible to enroll. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using a permuted block design to either a 5-day amoxicillin challenge (intervention) or a placebo (control). The primary outcome measures were adherence to the intervention (N, % taking at least 80% of capsules), need for unblinding (N, %), and recruitment feasibility (N, % of eligible patients enrolled). The secondary outcome measures included positive oral challenges, defined as immune-mediated adverse events up to and including day 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 302 adults and randomly assigned 120 participants to intervention (n=60) or control (n=60). The mean (standard deviation) age was 49.4 years (17.6). Allergy histories included 42% (50/120) delayed reactions and 58% (70/120) of unknown timing. Adherence to the intervention was 83% (100/120; 95% confidence interval, 75 to 90) (88% intervention and 78% control). No patients were unblinded and recruitment feasibility was 71% (120/169). The number of positive oral challenges was 7 of 60 (12%) in the intervention group and 3 of 60 (5%) in the control group (risk difference, 6.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -3.2 to 16.5). One serious adverse event (1/60, 1.7%, severe cutaneous adverse reaction) was observed in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Conducting a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of single-dose versus multidose oral amoxicillin challenge was feasible. A fully powered efficacy trial is needed to assess between-group differences in immune-mediated adverse events. (Funded by Austin Health and others; trial registration: ANZCTR - ACTRN12623001242617, registered on November 30, 2023.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"5 3","pages":"EVIDoa2500038"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2500038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of prolonged (i.e., multidose) compared with single-dose amoxicillin challenge in patients with a history of delayed penicillin allergy and to assess the frequency of immune-mediated adverse events.

Methods: We conducted a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter randomized feasibility trial at four Australian hospitals. Adults who had a history of penicillin allergy of delayed-onset (2 or more hours after exposure) or unknown timing and had tolerated a single-dose oral challenge to amoxicillin were eligible to enroll. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using a permuted block design to either a 5-day amoxicillin challenge (intervention) or a placebo (control). The primary outcome measures were adherence to the intervention (N, % taking at least 80% of capsules), need for unblinding (N, %), and recruitment feasibility (N, % of eligible patients enrolled). The secondary outcome measures included positive oral challenges, defined as immune-mediated adverse events up to and including day 7.

Results: We screened 302 adults and randomly assigned 120 participants to intervention (n=60) or control (n=60). The mean (standard deviation) age was 49.4 years (17.6). Allergy histories included 42% (50/120) delayed reactions and 58% (70/120) of unknown timing. Adherence to the intervention was 83% (100/120; 95% confidence interval, 75 to 90) (88% intervention and 78% control). No patients were unblinded and recruitment feasibility was 71% (120/169). The number of positive oral challenges was 7 of 60 (12%) in the intervention group and 3 of 60 (5%) in the control group (risk difference, 6.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -3.2 to 16.5). One serious adverse event (1/60, 1.7%, severe cutaneous adverse reaction) was observed in the control group.

Conclusions: Conducting a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of single-dose versus multidose oral amoxicillin challenge was feasible. A fully powered efficacy trial is needed to assess between-group differences in immune-mediated adverse events. (Funded by Austin Health and others; trial registration: ANZCTR - ACTRN12623001242617, registered on November 30, 2023.).

长期与单剂量刺激治疗青霉素过敏的可行性试验。
背景:我们的目的是评估进行一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的可行性,对有延迟性青霉素过敏史的患者进行长期(即多剂量)与单剂量阿莫西林刺激的比较,并评估免疫介导的不良事件的频率。方法:我们在澳大利亚四家医院进行了一项平行、双盲、安慰剂对照的多中心随机可行性试验。有延迟发作(暴露后2小时或更长时间)或未知时间的青霉素过敏史且耐受单剂量口服阿莫西林的成人符合入组条件。采用排列区设计,参与者按1:1的比例随机分配到为期5天的阿莫西林治疗组(干预组)或安慰剂组(对照组)。主要结局指标是干预的依从性(N, %服用至少80%的胶囊)、解盲需求(N, %)和招募可行性(N, %入选的符合条件的患者)。次要结局指标包括口腔刺激阳性,定义为免疫介导的不良事件,直至并包括第7天。结果:我们筛选了302名成年人,并随机将120名参与者分为干预组(n=60)和对照组(n=60)。平均(标准差)年龄为49.4岁(17.6岁)。过敏史包括42%(50/120)的延迟反应和58%(70/120)的未知时间。干预依从率为83%(100/120;95%可信区间为75 ~ 90)(干预88%,对照组78%)。没有患者开盲,招募可行性为71%(120/169)。干预组60例口腔挑战中有7例(12%)阳性,对照组60例中有3例(5%)阳性(风险差异6.7个百分点;95%可信区间为-3.2 ~ 16.5)。对照组出现1例严重不良反应(1/60,1.7%,严重皮肤不良反应)。结论:开展单剂量口服阿莫西林与多剂量口服阿莫西林的双盲、安慰剂对照随机试验是可行的。需要一项完全有效的疗效试验来评估免疫介导的不良事件的组间差异。(由Austin Health等资助,试验注册:ANZCTR - ACTRN12623001242617,注册于2023年11月30日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书