Comparing Regenerative Biologics and Standard Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Study of PRP, Cell-Based, and Peptide Interventions.

Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-06 DOI:10.26502/josm.511500247
Andre Aabedi, Devendra K Agrawal
{"title":"Comparing Regenerative Biologics and Standard Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Study of PRP, Cell-Based, and Peptide Interventions.","authors":"Andre Aabedi, Devendra K Agrawal","doi":"10.26502/josm.511500247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy is a degenerative condition characterized by persistent shoulder pain, weakness, and functional limitation. Conventional pharmacologic therapies-including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroid injections-are commonly used but provide only short-term symptom relief without addressing underlying tendon degeneration, and may negatively affect tendon integrity. These limitations have prompted increasing interest in regenerative therapies aimed at promoting tissue repair and durable clinical improvement. This literature review evaluates and compares the clinical outcomes, safety profiles, and practical considerations of regenerative therapies-specifically platelet-rich plasma, mesenchymal stem cell-based interventions, and peptide-based therapies-relative to traditional pharmacologic management for chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy. A comprehensive review of randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and consensus guidelines was conducted to assess pain relief, functional outcomes, tendon structural integrity, safety, and clinical applicability of pharmacologic versus regenerative treatment strategies. Pharmacologic treatments, particularly NSAIDs and corticosteroid injections, demonstrate limited efficacy beyond short-term pain reduction and do not promote tendon healing; repeated corticosteroid use is associated with tendon weakening and inferior long-term outcomes. In contrast, PRP consistently provides superior intermediate- and long-term improvements in pain and function compared with corticosteroids, with favorable safety profiles. Mesenchymal stem cell therapies show promising regenerative potential, including structural tendon improvement and sustained symptom relief, though evidence is limited by heterogeneity, cost, and regulatory constraints. Peptide-based therapies represent an emerging modality with encouraging preclinical and early clinical data but remain insufficiently validated for routine use. Regenerative therapies-particularly platelet-rich plasma and mesenchymal stem cell-based interventions-offer safer and more durable alternatives to conventional pharmacologic management for select patients with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy who have failed conservative care. However, widespread clinical adoption is limited by variability in protocols, regulatory barriers, and a lack of large-scale, high-quality randomized trials. Further research is required to standardize treatment approaches, refine patient selection, and establish long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics and sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/josm.511500247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy is a degenerative condition characterized by persistent shoulder pain, weakness, and functional limitation. Conventional pharmacologic therapies-including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroid injections-are commonly used but provide only short-term symptom relief without addressing underlying tendon degeneration, and may negatively affect tendon integrity. These limitations have prompted increasing interest in regenerative therapies aimed at promoting tissue repair and durable clinical improvement. This literature review evaluates and compares the clinical outcomes, safety profiles, and practical considerations of regenerative therapies-specifically platelet-rich plasma, mesenchymal stem cell-based interventions, and peptide-based therapies-relative to traditional pharmacologic management for chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy. A comprehensive review of randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and consensus guidelines was conducted to assess pain relief, functional outcomes, tendon structural integrity, safety, and clinical applicability of pharmacologic versus regenerative treatment strategies. Pharmacologic treatments, particularly NSAIDs and corticosteroid injections, demonstrate limited efficacy beyond short-term pain reduction and do not promote tendon healing; repeated corticosteroid use is associated with tendon weakening and inferior long-term outcomes. In contrast, PRP consistently provides superior intermediate- and long-term improvements in pain and function compared with corticosteroids, with favorable safety profiles. Mesenchymal stem cell therapies show promising regenerative potential, including structural tendon improvement and sustained symptom relief, though evidence is limited by heterogeneity, cost, and regulatory constraints. Peptide-based therapies represent an emerging modality with encouraging preclinical and early clinical data but remain insufficiently validated for routine use. Regenerative therapies-particularly platelet-rich plasma and mesenchymal stem cell-based interventions-offer safer and more durable alternatives to conventional pharmacologic management for select patients with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy who have failed conservative care. However, widespread clinical adoption is limited by variability in protocols, regulatory barriers, and a lack of large-scale, high-quality randomized trials. Further research is required to standardize treatment approaches, refine patient selection, and establish long-term efficacy.

比较再生生物制剂和标准药物治疗慢性肩袖肌腱病变:PRP、细胞和肽干预的研究。
慢性肩袖肌腱病是一种退行性疾病,其特征是持续的肩部疼痛、虚弱和功能限制。常规的药物治疗——包括非甾体抗炎药和皮质类固醇注射——通常被使用,但只能提供短期的症状缓解,而不能解决潜在的肌腱变性,并且可能对肌腱完整性产生负面影响。这些局限性促使人们对旨在促进组织修复和持久临床改善的再生疗法越来越感兴趣。本文献综述评估并比较了再生疗法的临床结果、安全性和实际考虑因素,特别是富血小板血浆、间充质干细胞干预和基于肽的治疗,相对于传统药物治疗慢性肩袖肌腱病变。对随机对照试验、系统评价、荟萃分析和共识指南进行了全面回顾,以评估药物治疗与再生治疗策略的疼痛缓解、功能结局、肌腱结构完整性、安全性和临床适用性。药物治疗,特别是非甾体抗炎药和皮质类固醇注射,除了短期减轻疼痛外,疗效有限,不能促进肌腱愈合;反复使用皮质类固醇与肌腱衰弱和较差的长期预后有关。相比之下,与皮质类固醇相比,PRP在疼痛和功能方面始终提供优越的中期和长期改善,并具有良好的安全性。间充质干细胞疗法显示出有希望的再生潜力,包括结构肌腱改善和持续症状缓解,尽管证据受到异质性、成本和监管限制的限制。以肽为基础的治疗代表了一种新兴的模式,具有令人鼓舞的临床前和早期临床数据,但仍未充分验证常规使用。再生疗法——尤其是富血小板血浆和间充质干细胞干预——为保守治疗失败的慢性肩袖肌腱病变患者提供了比传统药物治疗更安全、更持久的选择。然而,由于方案的可变性、监管障碍和缺乏大规模、高质量的随机试验,广泛的临床应用受到限制。需要进一步的研究来规范治疗方法,完善患者选择,并建立长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书