Federated learning for teacher data privacy protection: a study in the context of the PIPL.

IF 3.8 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Big Data Pub Date : 2026-02-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdata.2026.1681382
Shanwei Chen, Xiu Zhi Qi, Xue Hui Han, Zhao Chen Fan, Le Le Wang
{"title":"Federated learning for teacher data privacy protection: a study in the context of the PIPL.","authors":"Shanwei Chen, Xiu Zhi Qi, Xue Hui Han, Zhao Chen Fan, Le Le Wang","doi":"10.3389/fdata.2026.1681382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) in China imposes strict requirements on personal data handling, particularly in educational contexts where teacher data privacy is critical. Traditional centralized machine learning approaches pose significant risks of data breaches and non-compliance. Federated Learning (FL) offers a promising decentralized alternative by enabling collaborative model training without sharing raw data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study combines quantitative simulations and qualitative compliance analysis to evaluate FL frameworks under PIPL principles, with a focus on Differential Privacy as the primary empirically validated mechanism for noise addition and privacy guarantee. Other techniques, such as Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMC), are analyzed theoretically for their alignment with PIPL requirements like data minimization, anonymization, and encrypted transmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experimental simulations demonstrate that FL effectively reduces data breach risks compared to centralized methods. It achieves principle-level compliance with PIPL through local data processing, differential privacy mechanisms, and secure aggregation, leading to improved privacy preservation while maintaining model performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FL conceptually supports teacher data privacy protection under the PIPL framework. This study proposes a tailored compliance framework that integrates FL with privacy-enhancing technologies, offering theoretical foundations and practical recommendations for educational institutions and technology implementers to deploy privacy-preserving machine learning solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":52859,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Big Data","volume":"9 ","pages":"1681382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12926099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Big Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2026.1681382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) in China imposes strict requirements on personal data handling, particularly in educational contexts where teacher data privacy is critical. Traditional centralized machine learning approaches pose significant risks of data breaches and non-compliance. Federated Learning (FL) offers a promising decentralized alternative by enabling collaborative model training without sharing raw data.

Methods: This study combines quantitative simulations and qualitative compliance analysis to evaluate FL frameworks under PIPL principles, with a focus on Differential Privacy as the primary empirically validated mechanism for noise addition and privacy guarantee. Other techniques, such as Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMC), are analyzed theoretically for their alignment with PIPL requirements like data minimization, anonymization, and encrypted transmission.

Results: Experimental simulations demonstrate that FL effectively reduces data breach risks compared to centralized methods. It achieves principle-level compliance with PIPL through local data processing, differential privacy mechanisms, and secure aggregation, leading to improved privacy preservation while maintaining model performance.

Conclusion: FL conceptually supports teacher data privacy protection under the PIPL framework. This study proposes a tailored compliance framework that integrates FL with privacy-enhancing technologies, offering theoretical foundations and practical recommendations for educational institutions and technology implementers to deploy privacy-preserving machine learning solutions.

面向教师数据隐私保护的联邦学习:PIPL背景下的研究。
背景:中国的《个人信息保护法》(PIPL)对个人数据处理提出了严格的要求,特别是在教师数据隐私至关重要的教育环境中。传统的集中式机器学习方法存在数据泄露和不合规的重大风险。联邦学习(FL)通过在不共享原始数据的情况下支持协作模型训练,提供了一种很有前途的去中心化替代方案。方法:本研究结合定量模拟和定性合规分析来评估PIPL原则下的FL框架,重点研究差分隐私作为噪声添加和隐私保障的主要经验验证机制。其他技术,如安全多方计算(SMC),则从理论上分析它们是否符合PIPL要求,如数据最小化、匿名化和加密传输。结果:实验模拟表明,与集中式方法相比,FL有效地降低了数据泄露风险。它通过本地数据处理、差异隐私机制和安全聚合实现了对PIPL的原则级遵从,从而在保持模型性能的同时改进了隐私保护。结论:FL在概念上支持PIPL框架下的教师数据隐私保护。本研究提出了一个量身定制的合规框架,将FL与增强隐私的技术相结合,为教育机构和技术实施者部署保护隐私的机器学习解决方案提供理论基础和实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书