Assessment of Social Determinants of Maternal Health in Morocco Using Interpretive Grounded Theory.

IF 1.8
Chaimae Moujahid, Soufiane Yassara, Jack E Turman, Loubna Amahdar
{"title":"Assessment of Social Determinants of Maternal Health in Morocco Using Interpretive Grounded Theory.","authors":"Chaimae Moujahid, Soufiane Yassara, Jack E Turman, Loubna Amahdar","doi":"10.1177/2752535X261427817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMaternal health in at-risk communities is a significant public health issue, especially in areas characterized by socio-economic and healthcare inequalities. This study aims to uncover the multiple factors that influence maternal well-being in Morocco, providing insights for targeted interventions and policy development.MethodsAn interpretive grounded theory approach was employed, combining in-depth interviews, observations and constant comparative data analysis. Participants (<i>n</i> = 69, aged 17-49) were recruited from six provinces across five main regions, representing diverse socio-economic backgrounds, cultural contexts, and healthcare systems.ResultsThe analysis identified four main categories explaining the interactions and interrelations of factors shaping maternal and reproductive health. First, childbirth and postpartum maternal healthcare experiences reveal contrasting realities between home and hospital births, marked by fear, neglect, obstetric violence, and the critical role of family support. Second, cultural practices and beliefs strongly shape perceptions of pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum care, sometimes providing protection and other times reinforcing harmful traditions. Third, maternal health dynamics in the societal context highlight systemic barriers to healthcare access, the weight of sociocultural expectations, and the compounded burden of rural living. Finally, women's reproductive autonomy and family size underscore limited decision-making power, ambivalence toward contraceptive use, son preference, and contraceptive misinformation. Together, these categories illustrate the complexity of relationships between socioeconomic status, access to healthcare services, education, cultural beliefs, and social support networks, which emerge as important determinants of maternal and reproductive health outcomes in Morocco.ConclusionsBy amplifying their voices and perspectives, this research advocates for holistic, equitable, and empowering approaches to maternal healthcare. The findings underscore the need for interventions tailored to local contexts, based on a thorough understanding of the determinants of maternal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X261427817"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X261427817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMaternal health in at-risk communities is a significant public health issue, especially in areas characterized by socio-economic and healthcare inequalities. This study aims to uncover the multiple factors that influence maternal well-being in Morocco, providing insights for targeted interventions and policy development.MethodsAn interpretive grounded theory approach was employed, combining in-depth interviews, observations and constant comparative data analysis. Participants (n = 69, aged 17-49) were recruited from six provinces across five main regions, representing diverse socio-economic backgrounds, cultural contexts, and healthcare systems.ResultsThe analysis identified four main categories explaining the interactions and interrelations of factors shaping maternal and reproductive health. First, childbirth and postpartum maternal healthcare experiences reveal contrasting realities between home and hospital births, marked by fear, neglect, obstetric violence, and the critical role of family support. Second, cultural practices and beliefs strongly shape perceptions of pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum care, sometimes providing protection and other times reinforcing harmful traditions. Third, maternal health dynamics in the societal context highlight systemic barriers to healthcare access, the weight of sociocultural expectations, and the compounded burden of rural living. Finally, women's reproductive autonomy and family size underscore limited decision-making power, ambivalence toward contraceptive use, son preference, and contraceptive misinformation. Together, these categories illustrate the complexity of relationships between socioeconomic status, access to healthcare services, education, cultural beliefs, and social support networks, which emerge as important determinants of maternal and reproductive health outcomes in Morocco.ConclusionsBy amplifying their voices and perspectives, this research advocates for holistic, equitable, and empowering approaches to maternal healthcare. The findings underscore the need for interventions tailored to local contexts, based on a thorough understanding of the determinants of maternal health.

利用解释性扎根理论评估摩洛哥孕产妇健康的社会决定因素。
高危社区的孕产妇保健是一个重大的公共卫生问题,特别是在社会经济和保健不平等的地区。本研究旨在揭示影响摩洛哥孕产妇福祉的多种因素,为有针对性的干预措施和政策制定提供见解。方法采用扎根理论解释方法,结合深度访谈、观察和持续对比数据分析。参与者(n = 69,年龄17-49岁)从五个主要地区的六个省份招募,代表了不同的社会经济背景、文化背景和医疗体系。结果分析确定了四个主要类别,解释了影响孕产妇和生殖健康的因素之间的相互作用和相互关系。首先,分娩和产后孕产妇保健经验揭示了家庭分娩和医院分娩之间截然不同的现实,其特点是恐惧、忽视、产科暴力以及家庭支持的关键作用。其次,文化习俗和信仰强烈地塑造了对怀孕、分娩和产后护理的看法,有时提供保护,有时加强有害的传统。第三,社会背景下的孕产妇健康动态突出了获得医疗保健的系统性障碍、社会文化期望的影响以及农村生活的复杂负担。最后,妇女的生育自主权和家庭规模强调了有限的决策权、对避孕措施使用的矛盾心理、重男轻女和避孕错误信息。总之,这些类别说明了社会经济地位、获得保健服务、教育、文化信仰和社会支持网络之间关系的复杂性,这些关系成为摩洛哥孕产妇和生殖健康结果的重要决定因素。结论:通过放大她们的声音和观点,本研究倡导对孕产妇保健采取全面、公平和赋权的方法。调查结果强调,需要在彻底了解孕产妇健康决定因素的基础上,采取适合当地情况的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书