Efficacy of Jackson-Pratt Mediastinal Drains in Reducing Pericardial Effusion and Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
{"title":"Efficacy of Jackson-Pratt Mediastinal Drains in Reducing Pericardial Effusion and Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Mehmet Ali Yuruk, Ahmet Coşkun Özdemir","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2025-0277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative complications such as pericardial and pleural effusions, cardiac tamponade, and atrial fibrillation (AF) are common after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). While standard chest tubes are routinely used for drainage, Jackson-Pratt drains (JP-D) may offer advantages due to their flexible design and ability to maintain negative pressure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study compared outcomes between patients who received conventional chest tubes drains (CT-D group) (n = 672; 2016 - 2020) and those who received JP-D in addition to standard drains (JP-D group, n = 706; 2020 - 2023) after CABG. Demographic, operative, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups were similar in baseline characteristics (P > 0.05 for all). The JP-D group had significantly lower rates of cardiac tamponade (0.28% vs. 1.78%, P = 0.008), reoperation (1.55% vs. 4.61%, P = 0.001), wound infections (2.1% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.024), 30-day mortality (1.1% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.035), and postoperative AF (9.2% vs. 16.8%, P = 0.039). Despite a higher first-day drainage volume (480 ± 150 mL vs. 360 ± 120 mL, P = 0.030), total drainage volume was similar. Pulmonary complications, including atelectasis and pneumonia, were also significantly reduced in the JP-D group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of JP-D in conjunction with standard thoracic drainage after CABG was associated with improved postoperative outcomes, including reduced effusion-related complications and AF. These findings suggest potential benefits of JP-D in cardiac surgery, though prospective studies are warranted to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12931437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2025-0277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Postoperative complications such as pericardial and pleural effusions, cardiac tamponade, and atrial fibrillation (AF) are common after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). While standard chest tubes are routinely used for drainage, Jackson-Pratt drains (JP-D) may offer advantages due to their flexible design and ability to maintain negative pressure.
Methods: This retrospective study compared outcomes between patients who received conventional chest tubes drains (CT-D group) (n = 672; 2016 - 2020) and those who received JP-D in addition to standard drains (JP-D group, n = 706; 2020 - 2023) after CABG. Demographic, operative, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed.
Results: Both groups were similar in baseline characteristics (P > 0.05 for all). The JP-D group had significantly lower rates of cardiac tamponade (0.28% vs. 1.78%, P = 0.008), reoperation (1.55% vs. 4.61%, P = 0.001), wound infections (2.1% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.024), 30-day mortality (1.1% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.035), and postoperative AF (9.2% vs. 16.8%, P = 0.039). Despite a higher first-day drainage volume (480 ± 150 mL vs. 360 ± 120 mL, P = 0.030), total drainage volume was similar. Pulmonary complications, including atelectasis and pneumonia, were also significantly reduced in the JP-D group.
Conclusions: The use of JP-D in conjunction with standard thoracic drainage after CABG was associated with improved postoperative outcomes, including reduced effusion-related complications and AF. These findings suggest potential benefits of JP-D in cardiac surgery, though prospective studies are warranted to confirm these results.
导语:冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)术后常见并发症如心包积液、心包填塞、心房颤动(AF)等。虽然标准胸管通常用于引流,但由于其灵活的设计和保持负压的能力,Jackson-Pratt引流管(JP-D)可能具有优势。方法:本回顾性研究比较了CABG术后接受常规胸管引流的患者(CT-D组)(n = 672; 2016 - 2020)和在标准引流的同时接受JP-D的患者(JP-D组,n = 706; 2020 - 2023)的结果。收集和分析人口统计学、手术和术后数据。结果:两组基线特征相似(P < 0.05)。JP-D组心脏填塞率(0.28% vs. 1.78%, P = 0.008)、再手术率(1.55% vs. 4.61%, P = 0.001)、伤口感染率(2.1% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.024)、30天死亡率(1.1% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.035)和术后AF (9.2% vs. 16.8%, P = 0.039)显著降低。尽管第一天引流量更高(480±150 mL vs 360±120 mL, P = 0.030),但总引流量相似。肺并发症,包括肺不张和肺炎,在JP-D组也显著减少。结论:CABG术后联合标准胸腔引流使用JP-D可改善术后预后,包括减少积液相关并发症和房颤。这些发现表明JP-D在心脏手术中的潜在益处,尽管需要前瞻性研究来证实这些结果。