Diagnostic Performance of the Multi-Biomarker Disease Activity (MBDA) Score for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with New-Onset Joint Symptoms: An Age-Stratified Retrospective Study.

IF 3.4 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2026-02-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OARRR.S576941
Kazuya Hiura, Moeko Ito, Yuka Shimizu, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Sachiko Iwaki-Egawa
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of the Multi-Biomarker Disease Activity (MBDA) Score for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with New-Onset Joint Symptoms: An Age-Stratified Retrospective Study.","authors":"Kazuya Hiura, Moeko Ito, Yuka Shimizu, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Sachiko Iwaki-Egawa","doi":"10.2147/OARRR.S576941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) positivity decreases in elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA), likely due to immunosenescence and clinical heterogeneity. This study aimed to evaluate the multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) score as an alternative diagnostic marker for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with new-onset joint symptoms, focusing on ACPA-negative cases stratified into young-onset RA (YORA) and EORA.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at two institutions in Hokkaido, Japan (2018-2022). Patients with new-onset joint symptoms who had not received prior RA therapy were included. Baseline serum samples were analyzed for MBDA and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Diagnostic performance for RA was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the curve, and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 257 patients, 90 were <60 years (RA, n = 42) and 167 were ≥60 years (RA, n = 84). In YORA, ACPA was the strongest predictor (odds ratio [OR]: 170.48, <i>P</i> < 0.01). In ACPA-negative YORA, both MBDA (OR: 6.51, <i>P</i> = 0.03) and hsCRP (OR: 15.56, <i>P</i> = 0.02) were significant, and their combination improved accuracy to 86.9% (OR: 18.00, <i>P</i> < 0.01). In EORA, ACPA showed lower accuracy (70.1%), whereas MBDA was higher (74.9%). In ACPA-negative EORA, the combination of MBDA and hsCRP provided the highest predictive ability (accuracy: 72.8%; OR: 43.52, <i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MBDA, particularly when combined with hsCRP, provides clinically meaningful diagnostic value for RA in patients with new-onset joint symptoms, particularly in ACPA-negative YORA and EORA.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was retrospectively registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000057829).</p>","PeriodicalId":45545,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","volume":"18 ","pages":"576941"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S576941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) positivity decreases in elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA), likely due to immunosenescence and clinical heterogeneity. This study aimed to evaluate the multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) score as an alternative diagnostic marker for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with new-onset joint symptoms, focusing on ACPA-negative cases stratified into young-onset RA (YORA) and EORA.

Patients and methods: This retrospective study was conducted at two institutions in Hokkaido, Japan (2018-2022). Patients with new-onset joint symptoms who had not received prior RA therapy were included. Baseline serum samples were analyzed for MBDA and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Diagnostic performance for RA was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the curve, and logistic regression.

Results: Among 257 patients, 90 were <60 years (RA, n = 42) and 167 were ≥60 years (RA, n = 84). In YORA, ACPA was the strongest predictor (odds ratio [OR]: 170.48, P < 0.01). In ACPA-negative YORA, both MBDA (OR: 6.51, P = 0.03) and hsCRP (OR: 15.56, P = 0.02) were significant, and their combination improved accuracy to 86.9% (OR: 18.00, P < 0.01). In EORA, ACPA showed lower accuracy (70.1%), whereas MBDA was higher (74.9%). In ACPA-negative EORA, the combination of MBDA and hsCRP provided the highest predictive ability (accuracy: 72.8%; OR: 43.52, P < 0.01).

Conclusion: MBDA, particularly when combined with hsCRP, provides clinically meaningful diagnostic value for RA in patients with new-onset joint symptoms, particularly in ACPA-negative YORA and EORA.

Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000057829).

多生物标志物疾病活动性(MBDA)评分对新发关节症状的类风湿关节炎患者的诊断性能:一项年龄分层回顾性研究
目的:抗瓜氨酸蛋白抗体(ACPA)在老年类风湿关节炎(EORA)中呈阳性下降,可能是由于免疫衰老和临床异质性。本研究旨在评估多生物标志物疾病活动性(MBDA)评分作为新发关节症状患者类风湿关节炎(RA)的替代诊断标志物,重点关注acpa阴性病例,分为年轻发病RA (YORA)和EORA。患者和方法:本回顾性研究于2018-2022年在日本北海道的两家机构进行。新发关节症状且未接受RA治疗的患者被纳入研究。基线血清样本分析MBDA和高敏c反应蛋白(hsCRP)。使用敏感性、特异性、准确性、曲线下面积和逻辑回归来评估RA的诊断性能。结果:257例患者中,90例P < 0.01)。在acpa阴性的YORA中,MBDA (OR: 6.51, P = 0.03)和hsCRP (OR: 15.56, P = 0.02)的准确率均显著提高,两者联合提高准确率至86.9% (OR: 18.00, P < 0.01)。在EORA中,ACPA的准确率较低(70.1%),而MBDA的准确率较高(74.9%)。在acpa阴性EORA中,MBDA联合hsCRP的预测能力最高(准确率:72.8%;OR: 43.52, P < 0.01)。结论:MBDA,特别是联合hsCRP,对新发关节症状患者,特别是acpa阴性的YORA和EORA患者的RA诊断具有临床意义。试验注册:本研究回顾性注册在大学医院医学信息网(UMIN000057829)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书