A needle in a haystack: Assessing the radiographic detectability of microsurgical suture needles using a human cadaveric model

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY
JPRAS Open Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jpra.2026.01.033
Lukas P. O’Brien , Kasie O’ Reilly , Mary Ellen McMahon , Antonina Tcacenco , Ronan Cahill , Barry O’Sullivan , Shirley M. Potter
{"title":"A needle in a haystack: Assessing the radiographic detectability of microsurgical suture needles using a human cadaveric model","authors":"Lukas P. O’Brien ,&nbsp;Kasie O’ Reilly ,&nbsp;Mary Ellen McMahon ,&nbsp;Antonina Tcacenco ,&nbsp;Ronan Cahill ,&nbsp;Barry O’Sullivan ,&nbsp;Shirley M. Potter","doi":"10.1016/j.jpra.2026.01.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intraoperative loss of surgical needles represents a rare but significant challenge in operative settings, particularly in microsurgical procedures involving free tissue transfer where fine sutures (8–0 to 10–0) are employed. Current hospital protocols typically use intraoperative portable radiography to localize misplaced needles. However, the diagnostic utility of X-ray imaging in detecting small-caliber needles remains poorly defined.</div><div>Following ethical approval, a cadaveric study was conducted using a range of monofilament Ethilon™ needles (3–0 to 10–0 caliber), which were inserted at four anatomically relevant surgical sites. Anteroposterior radiographs were obtained using a standard intraoperative C-arm. A total of 53 participants - including consultant surgeons, radiology trainees, nursing staff, and surgical registrars—were asked to identify needle number and location using blinded image review. Radiographic identification of needles was accurate for calibers 3–0, 4–0, 5–0, and 6–0, with identification rates approaching or exceeding 99%. Smaller needle calibers showed a dramatic decline in detection accuracy. The 8–0 needles were correctly localized in 3.77% of attempts, just one 9–0 needle was successfully identified. None of the 10–0 needles were detected across all anatomical sites.</div><div>While portable radiography remains a reliable modality for locating surgical needles of caliber 3–0 to 6–0, it proves ineffective for the detection of finer microsurgical needles (≥8–0). These results have important implications for operative protocols and clinical decision-making. The routine X-ray imaging in cases of microsurgical needle loss warrants reconsideration to favor evidence-informed strategies that minimize intraoperative delays, prolonged anesthesia and unnecessary radiation exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37996,"journal":{"name":"JPRAS Open","volume":"48 ","pages":"Pages 965-975"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPRAS Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587826000458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intraoperative loss of surgical needles represents a rare but significant challenge in operative settings, particularly in microsurgical procedures involving free tissue transfer where fine sutures (8–0 to 10–0) are employed. Current hospital protocols typically use intraoperative portable radiography to localize misplaced needles. However, the diagnostic utility of X-ray imaging in detecting small-caliber needles remains poorly defined.
Following ethical approval, a cadaveric study was conducted using a range of monofilament Ethilon™ needles (3–0 to 10–0 caliber), which were inserted at four anatomically relevant surgical sites. Anteroposterior radiographs were obtained using a standard intraoperative C-arm. A total of 53 participants - including consultant surgeons, radiology trainees, nursing staff, and surgical registrars—were asked to identify needle number and location using blinded image review. Radiographic identification of needles was accurate for calibers 3–0, 4–0, 5–0, and 6–0, with identification rates approaching or exceeding 99%. Smaller needle calibers showed a dramatic decline in detection accuracy. The 8–0 needles were correctly localized in 3.77% of attempts, just one 9–0 needle was successfully identified. None of the 10–0 needles were detected across all anatomical sites.
While portable radiography remains a reliable modality for locating surgical needles of caliber 3–0 to 6–0, it proves ineffective for the detection of finer microsurgical needles (≥8–0). These results have important implications for operative protocols and clinical decision-making. The routine X-ray imaging in cases of microsurgical needle loss warrants reconsideration to favor evidence-informed strategies that minimize intraoperative delays, prolonged anesthesia and unnecessary radiation exposure.
大海捞针:用人体尸体模型评估显微外科缝合针的放射学可探测性。
术中手术针头丢失是手术环境中罕见但重要的挑战,特别是在涉及游离组织转移的显微外科手术中,采用细缝线(8-0至10-0)。目前的医院方案通常使用术中便携式x线摄影来定位错位的针头。然而,x射线成像在检测小口径针头方面的诊断效用仍然不明确。经伦理批准后,使用一系列单丝Ethilon™针头(3-0至10-0口径)进行尸体研究,将其插入四个解剖相关的手术部位。采用标准术中c臂进行正位x线片拍摄。共有53名参与者——包括外科顾问医生、放射学实习生、护理人员和外科登记员——被要求使用盲法图像回顾来识别针头的编号和位置。3-0、4-0、5-0和6-0口径针的x线鉴别准确率接近或超过99%。较小的针径显示出检测精度的急剧下降。8-0针的定位正确率为3.77%,仅1根9-0针被成功识别。所有解剖部位均未检测到10-0针。虽然便携式x线摄影仍然是定位3-0到6-0口径手术针的可靠方式,但它对检测更细的显微手术针(≥8-0)无效。这些结果对手术方案和临床决策具有重要意义。显微外科针头丢失病例的常规x线成像值得重新考虑,以支持循证策略,最大限度地减少术中延误,延长麻醉时间和不必要的辐射暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JPRAS Open
JPRAS Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: JPRAS Open is an international, open access journal dedicated to publishing case reports, short communications, and full-length articles. JPRAS Open will provide the most current source of information and references in plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. The Journal is based on the continued need to improve surgical care by providing highlights in general reconstructive surgery; cleft lip, palate and craniofacial surgery; head and neck surgery; skin cancer; breast surgery; hand surgery; lower limb trauma; burns; and aesthetic surgery. The Journal will provide authors with fast publication times.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书