Empowering Independence in Spina Bifida: A Scoping Review of Interventions.

IF 1.4 Q1 REHABILITATION
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.46292/sci25-00046
Camille S Wilson, Lauren E Bradstreet, Natasha N Ludwig, Alison Gehred, Catherine Stephan, T Andrew Zabel, Christine Koterba
{"title":"Empowering Independence in Spina Bifida: A Scoping Review of Interventions.","authors":"Camille S Wilson, Lauren E Bradstreet, Natasha N Ludwig, Alison Gehred, Catherine Stephan, T Andrew Zabel, Christine Koterba","doi":"10.46292/sci25-00046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine intervention studies focused on developing independence readiness skills in individuals with spina bifida.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scoping review used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines to identify intervention studies published from 2000 to 2024. Articles were included if they were an intervention study focused on preidentified domains of independence based on the Guidelines for the Care of People with Spina Bifida by the Spina Bifida Association. Title and abstract screening and full-text articles were completed by author dyads. Data extraction was completed in duplicate to ensure accuracy by separate raters. Inconsistencies were resolved through group consensus and item review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2542 unique references, 2028 were removed for not meeting inclusion criteria. Following full-text review, 38 studies were included in the final analysis. Only 5 studies utilized a rigorous randomized control trial study design. Intervention gaps targeting supported decision-making models and sexual health were noted. Interventions generally targeted school-age youth to older adults, with no studies focused on interventions for early childhood populations. Outcomes measurement varied widely across studies; future research will benefit from standardization of tools used to measure outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intervention studies focused on increasing independence skills for individuals with spina bifida are limited. For this growing area of research, comprehensive representation of understudied and underrepresented individuals within the spina bifida community, consideration of shared data elements across studies, and alignment of targeted domains of independence with stakeholder input must be central to future research efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46769,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","volume":"32 1","pages":"110-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12926803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46292/sci25-00046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine intervention studies focused on developing independence readiness skills in individuals with spina bifida.

Methods: The scoping review used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines to identify intervention studies published from 2000 to 2024. Articles were included if they were an intervention study focused on preidentified domains of independence based on the Guidelines for the Care of People with Spina Bifida by the Spina Bifida Association. Title and abstract screening and full-text articles were completed by author dyads. Data extraction was completed in duplicate to ensure accuracy by separate raters. Inconsistencies were resolved through group consensus and item review.

Results: From 2542 unique references, 2028 were removed for not meeting inclusion criteria. Following full-text review, 38 studies were included in the final analysis. Only 5 studies utilized a rigorous randomized control trial study design. Intervention gaps targeting supported decision-making models and sexual health were noted. Interventions generally targeted school-age youth to older adults, with no studies focused on interventions for early childhood populations. Outcomes measurement varied widely across studies; future research will benefit from standardization of tools used to measure outcomes of interest.

Conclusion: Intervention studies focused on increasing independence skills for individuals with spina bifida are limited. For this growing area of research, comprehensive representation of understudied and underrepresented individuals within the spina bifida community, consideration of shared data elements across studies, and alignment of targeted domains of independence with stakeholder input must be central to future research efforts.

增强脊柱裂的独立性:干预措施的范围审查。
目的:研究针对脊柱裂患者独立准备技能发展的干预研究。方法:范围评价使用首选报告项目进行系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)指南,以确定2000年至2024年发表的干预研究。如果文章是一项基于脊柱裂协会的脊柱裂患者护理指南的干预研究,重点关注预先确定的独立领域,则纳入研究。标题、摘要筛选和全文文章由作者二人组完成。数据提取一式两份完成,以确保由不同的评分者准确。通过小组协商一致和项目审查来解决不一致之处。结果:2542篇唯一文献中,2028篇因不符合纳入标准而被删除。在全文审查后,38项研究被纳入最终分析。只有5项研究采用了严格的随机对照试验研究设计。注意到针对支持决策模式和性健康的干预措施存在差距。干预措施一般针对学龄青年到老年人,没有针对幼儿人群的干预研究。不同研究的结果测量差异很大;未来的研究将受益于用于测量感兴趣的结果的工具的标准化。结论:专注于提高脊柱裂患者独立技能的干预研究是有限的。对于这一不断发展的研究领域,全面代表脊柱裂社区中未充分研究和未充分代表的个体,考虑跨研究的共享数据元素,并将目标独立领域与利益相关者的投入相结合,必须成为未来研究工作的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Now in our 22nd year as the leading interdisciplinary journal of SCI rehabilitation techniques and care. TSCIR is peer-reviewed, practical, and features one key topic per issue. Published topics include: mobility, sexuality, genitourinary, functional assessment, skin care, psychosocial, high tetraplegia, physical activity, pediatric, FES, sci/tbi, electronic medicine, orthotics, secondary conditions, research, aging, legal issues, women & sci, pain, environmental effects, life care planning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书