A Two-Level, Multidimensional Framework for Understanding and Treating Clinician Fatigue.

IF 1.4 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Health Care Analysis Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.1007/s10728-026-00560-7
Stephen Buetow
{"title":"A Two-Level, Multidimensional Framework for Understanding and Treating Clinician Fatigue.","authors":"Stephen Buetow","doi":"10.1007/s10728-026-00560-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46740,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Analysis","volume":" ","pages":"942-962"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-026-00560-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
理解和治疗临床医生疲劳的两层次、多维框架。
临床医生疲劳是一种涉及多方面的现象,但不同于职业倦怠。甚至在倦怠发展之前,它就会损害临床医生的健康和病人的护理。目前的干预措施往往将疲劳视为短期压力问题,忽视了其多维性。它不是一个统一的状态,而是由不同的心理表现——情感和认知状态——组成,这些表现对应于不同的潜在来源。本文提出了一个两层多维模型,将这些表现与驱动因素(包括组织压力和职业认同挑战)区分开来。不同的维度在临床医生的整个职业生涯中相互作用和发展,将疲劳定位为不仅是个人负担,而且是人类能力与机构需求之间系统性失调的诊断信号。在此基础上,该框架强调临床医生可以与团队和组织一起制定适应性反应。管理策略从直接的、临床医生主导的行动发展到长期的团队和组织干预,分为六个途径:战略划分、整合重新连接、适应性专业化、协作支持、系统参与和周期性更新。支持这些途径需要更广泛的制度和文化改革。将临床医生疲劳重新定义为个人职业选择和机构转型的一个信号,强调需要更人性化和可持续的护理模式,尊重临床医生的价值观和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Health Care Analysis is a journal that promotes dialogue and debate about conceptual and normative issues related to health and health care, including health systems, healthcare provision, health law, public policy and health, professional health practice, health services organization and decision-making, and health-related education at all levels of clinical medicine, public health and global health. Health Care Analysis seeks to support the conversation between philosophy and policy, in particular illustrating the importance of conceptual and normative analysis to health policy, practice and research. As such, papers accepted for publication are likely to analyse philosophical questions related to health, health care or health policy that focus on one or more of the following: aims or ends, theories, frameworks, concepts, principles, values or ideology. All styles of theoretical analysis are welcome providing that they illuminate conceptual or normative issues and encourage debate between those interested in health, philosophy and policy. Papers must be rigorous, but should strive for accessibility – with care being taken to ensure that their arguments and implications are plain to a broad academic and international audience. In addition to purely theoretical papers, papers grounded in empirical research or case-studies are very welcome so long as they explore the conceptual or normative implications of such work. Authors are encouraged, where possible, to have regard to the social contexts of the issues they are discussing, and all authors should ensure that they indicate the ‘real world’ implications of their work. Health Care Analysis publishes contributions from philosophers, lawyers, social scientists, healthcare educators, healthcare professionals and administrators, and other health-related academics and policy analysts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书