Modified POEM With Radial Extension for Achalasia: Short-Term Outcomes of a Prospective Single-Center Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Bahtiyar Muhammedoglu, Mehmet Y Pektezel, Vehbi Sirikci, Fatih Dolu, Aydin H Küpeli, Oğuzhan F Ay
{"title":"Modified POEM With Radial Extension for Achalasia: Short-Term Outcomes of a Prospective Single-Center Study.","authors":"Bahtiyar Muhammedoglu, Mehmet Y Pektezel, Vehbi Sirikci, Fatih Dolu, Aydin H Küpeli, Oğuzhan F Ay","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder that causes dysphagia owing to impaired lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation. This study aimed to evaluate a modified dissection and radial myotomy technique during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and to compare its outcomes with those of the standard approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, single-center study was conducted between February 2022 and December 2022. Eighty total with 80 achalasia patients undergoing POEM were divided into 2 groups: Group A (n=40), treated with the novel technique, and Group B (n=40), treated with the standard approach. Demographics, Eckardt score (ES), submucosal tunnel (ST), myotomy length, intervention duration, and adverse events were recorded. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 20 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who underwent the novel radial myotomy technique (Group A) had significantly longer myotomy lengths (11.8±2.4 vs. 8.1±2.0 cm, P <0.001), greater myotomy extension beyond the esophagogastric junction (4.2±0.8 vs. 2.7±0.6 cm, P <0.001), and improved postoperative Eckardt scores (median 1 [0-1] vs. 2, 1-3P =0.006) compared with the conventional POEM group (Group B). Subgroup analysis revealed that in Type III achalasia patients, the novel approach yielded longer submucosal tunnel lengths (15.6±0.8 cm, P =0.038) and favorable symptom relief. Despite extended dissection, there was no increase in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel dissection and radial myotomy technique demonstrated superior outcomes in reducing dysphagia symptoms and LES resistance compared with the standard approach. Tailoring ST and myotomy lengths based on the achalasia type and EGJ involvement may optimize outcomes without increasing the risk of GERD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder that causes dysphagia owing to impaired lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation. This study aimed to evaluate a modified dissection and radial myotomy technique during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and to compare its outcomes with those of the standard approach.

Methods: This prospective, single-center study was conducted between February 2022 and December 2022. Eighty total with 80 achalasia patients undergoing POEM were divided into 2 groups: Group A (n=40), treated with the novel technique, and Group B (n=40), treated with the standard approach. Demographics, Eckardt score (ES), submucosal tunnel (ST), myotomy length, intervention duration, and adverse events were recorded. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 20 months.

Results: Patients who underwent the novel radial myotomy technique (Group A) had significantly longer myotomy lengths (11.8±2.4 vs. 8.1±2.0 cm, P <0.001), greater myotomy extension beyond the esophagogastric junction (4.2±0.8 vs. 2.7±0.6 cm, P <0.001), and improved postoperative Eckardt scores (median 1 [0-1] vs. 2, 1-3P =0.006) compared with the conventional POEM group (Group B). Subgroup analysis revealed that in Type III achalasia patients, the novel approach yielded longer submucosal tunnel lengths (15.6±0.8 cm, P =0.038) and favorable symptom relief. Despite extended dissection, there was no increase in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related symptoms.

Conclusion: The novel dissection and radial myotomy technique demonstrated superior outcomes in reducing dysphagia symptoms and LES resistance compared with the standard approach. Tailoring ST and myotomy lengths based on the achalasia type and EGJ involvement may optimize outcomes without increasing the risk of GERD.

改良POEM与径向延伸治疗贲门失弛缓症:一项前瞻性单中心研究的短期结果。
背景:贲门失弛缓症是一种罕见的食管运动障碍,由于食管下括约肌(LES)松弛受损而导致吞咽困难。本研究旨在评估经口内窥镜肌切开术(POEM)中改良的剥离和桡骨肌切开术技术,并将其与标准入路的结果进行比较。方法:该前瞻性单中心研究于2022年2月至2022年12月进行。80例经POEM治疗的贲门失弛缓症患者分为两组:A组(n=40)采用新方法治疗,B组(n=40)采用标准方法治疗。记录人口统计学、Eckardt评分(ES)、粘膜下隧道(ST)、肌切开术长度、干预持续时间和不良事件。随访时间为3 ~ 20个月。结果:采用新型桡骨肌切开术的患者(A组)的肌切开术长度明显延长(11.8±2.4 cm vs. 8.1±2.0 cm)。结论:与标准入路相比,新型解剖和桡骨肌切开术在减轻吞咽困难症状和LES抵抗方面表现出更好的效果。根据贲门失弛缓症的类型和EGJ受损伤来调整ST和肌切开术的长度可以优化结果,而不会增加反流胃食管反流的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书