Katalin Arki, Johannes Harte, Fabienne Frickmann, Darren Hight, Sarah Saxena, Mia Gisselbaek, Anthony R Absalom, Joana Berger-Estilita, Friedrich Lersch
{"title":"Periodic limb movements during sedation and general anesthesia in elderly patients: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Katalin Arki, Johannes Harte, Fabienne Frickmann, Darren Hight, Sarah Saxena, Mia Gisselbaek, Anthony R Absalom, Joana Berger-Estilita, Friedrich Lersch","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01421-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dexmedetomidine sedation in elderly patients is associated with cognitive benefits due to its biomimetic non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep–like state. However, this state may predispose patients to periodic limb movements (PLMs), which can cause unintended procedural risk during sedation. We aimed to determine the incidence of PLMs during dexmedetomidine-based multimodal sedation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and explore associations with the need for conversion to general anesthesia. In this prospective observational study, 35 consecutive patients (mean age 81 ± 6 years; 17 female, 18 male) undergoing TAVI over a two-month period from October 2021 to the end of November 2021 were monitored using standard anesthesia monitoring, processed electroencephalography (pEEG) monitoring using Narcotrend 3-lead frontal EEGs (Narcotrend, Hannover, Germany), and bilateral ankle actimetry (SOMNOwatch™ plus). Sedation was administered according to our institutional protocol, beginning with a dexmedetomidine loading dose (0.5 µg kg⁻¹), followed by titration of the infusion between 0.2 and 1.5 µg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹. Additional propofol or fentanyl boluses were administered as clinically indicated by the responsible anesthesiologist. Actimetry, EEG patterns, and intraoperative events were analyzed. PLMs (2–6 movements/min; most commonly 3–5 movements/min) were observed in 20 of 35 patients (57%) and all conversions to general anesthesia (5/5, 100%) occurred in the PLM-positive group, highlighting a potential clinical impact on procedural stability. In the 19 patients with complete EEG datasets, Narcotrend indices during dexmedetomidine-only sedation averaged 96.6 ± 2.6, consistent with an awake–sedate EEG pattern. Following propofol administration, the index decreased to 39.3 ± 20.0, corresponding to a very large effect size (Cohen’s d = 2.85). Five conversions to general anesthesia were necessary in patients with PLMs, because of restlessness, although the severity of PLMs did not predict conversion. No patient had a known history of restless legs syndrome (RLS); prior neurological disease showed no consistent association with PLM occurrence. PLMs are common during dexmedetomidine sedation for TAVI in elderly patients and may need conversion to general anesthesia. While dexmedetomidine offers cognitive benefits, the potential for movement-related procedural risk warrants increased monitoring and consideration during patient selection and anesthetic planning. Further studies comparing sedation-induced and natural sleep PLMs are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"589-600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13194198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01421-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dexmedetomidine sedation in elderly patients is associated with cognitive benefits due to its biomimetic non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep–like state. However, this state may predispose patients to periodic limb movements (PLMs), which can cause unintended procedural risk during sedation. We aimed to determine the incidence of PLMs during dexmedetomidine-based multimodal sedation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and explore associations with the need for conversion to general anesthesia. In this prospective observational study, 35 consecutive patients (mean age 81 ± 6 years; 17 female, 18 male) undergoing TAVI over a two-month period from October 2021 to the end of November 2021 were monitored using standard anesthesia monitoring, processed electroencephalography (pEEG) monitoring using Narcotrend 3-lead frontal EEGs (Narcotrend, Hannover, Germany), and bilateral ankle actimetry (SOMNOwatch™ plus). Sedation was administered according to our institutional protocol, beginning with a dexmedetomidine loading dose (0.5 µg kg⁻¹), followed by titration of the infusion between 0.2 and 1.5 µg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹. Additional propofol or fentanyl boluses were administered as clinically indicated by the responsible anesthesiologist. Actimetry, EEG patterns, and intraoperative events were analyzed. PLMs (2–6 movements/min; most commonly 3–5 movements/min) were observed in 20 of 35 patients (57%) and all conversions to general anesthesia (5/5, 100%) occurred in the PLM-positive group, highlighting a potential clinical impact on procedural stability. In the 19 patients with complete EEG datasets, Narcotrend indices during dexmedetomidine-only sedation averaged 96.6 ± 2.6, consistent with an awake–sedate EEG pattern. Following propofol administration, the index decreased to 39.3 ± 20.0, corresponding to a very large effect size (Cohen’s d = 2.85). Five conversions to general anesthesia were necessary in patients with PLMs, because of restlessness, although the severity of PLMs did not predict conversion. No patient had a known history of restless legs syndrome (RLS); prior neurological disease showed no consistent association with PLM occurrence. PLMs are common during dexmedetomidine sedation for TAVI in elderly patients and may need conversion to general anesthesia. While dexmedetomidine offers cognitive benefits, the potential for movement-related procedural risk warrants increased monitoring and consideration during patient selection and anesthetic planning. Further studies comparing sedation-induced and natural sleep PLMs are needed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.