Periodic limb movements during sedation and general anesthesia in elderly patients: a prospective observational study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Katalin Arki, Johannes Harte, Fabienne Frickmann, Darren Hight, Sarah Saxena, Mia Gisselbaek, Anthony R Absalom, Joana Berger-Estilita, Friedrich Lersch
{"title":"Periodic limb movements during sedation and general anesthesia in elderly patients: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Katalin Arki, Johannes Harte, Fabienne Frickmann, Darren Hight, Sarah Saxena, Mia Gisselbaek, Anthony R Absalom, Joana Berger-Estilita, Friedrich Lersch","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01421-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dexmedetomidine sedation in elderly patients is associated with cognitive benefits due to its biomimetic non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep–like state. However, this state may predispose patients to periodic limb movements (PLMs), which can cause unintended procedural risk during sedation. We aimed to determine the incidence of PLMs during dexmedetomidine-based multimodal sedation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and explore associations with the need for conversion to general anesthesia. In this prospective observational study, 35 consecutive patients (mean age 81 ± 6 years; 17 female, 18 male) undergoing TAVI over a two-month period from October 2021 to the end of November 2021 were monitored using standard anesthesia monitoring, processed electroencephalography (pEEG) monitoring using Narcotrend 3-lead frontal EEGs (Narcotrend, Hannover, Germany), and bilateral ankle actimetry (SOMNOwatch™ plus). Sedation was administered according to our institutional protocol, beginning with a dexmedetomidine loading dose (0.5 µg kg⁻¹), followed by titration of the infusion between 0.2 and 1.5 µg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹. Additional propofol or fentanyl boluses were administered as clinically indicated by the responsible anesthesiologist. Actimetry, EEG patterns, and intraoperative events were analyzed. PLMs (2–6 movements/min; most commonly 3–5 movements/min) were observed in 20 of 35 patients (57%) and all conversions to general anesthesia (5/5, 100%) occurred in the PLM-positive group, highlighting a potential clinical impact on procedural stability. In the 19 patients with complete EEG datasets, Narcotrend indices during dexmedetomidine-only sedation averaged 96.6 ± 2.6, consistent with an awake–sedate EEG pattern. Following propofol administration, the index decreased to 39.3 ± 20.0, corresponding to a very large effect size (Cohen’s d = 2.85). Five conversions to general anesthesia were necessary in patients with PLMs, because of restlessness, although the severity of PLMs did not predict conversion. No patient had a known history of restless legs syndrome (RLS); prior neurological disease showed no consistent association with PLM occurrence. PLMs are common during dexmedetomidine sedation for TAVI in elderly patients and may need conversion to general anesthesia. While dexmedetomidine offers cognitive benefits, the potential for movement-related procedural risk warrants increased monitoring and consideration during patient selection and anesthetic planning. Further studies comparing sedation-induced and natural sleep PLMs are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"589-600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13194198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01421-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dexmedetomidine sedation in elderly patients is associated with cognitive benefits due to its biomimetic non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep–like state. However, this state may predispose patients to periodic limb movements (PLMs), which can cause unintended procedural risk during sedation. We aimed to determine the incidence of PLMs during dexmedetomidine-based multimodal sedation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and explore associations with the need for conversion to general anesthesia. In this prospective observational study, 35 consecutive patients (mean age 81 ± 6 years; 17 female, 18 male) undergoing TAVI over a two-month period from October 2021 to the end of November 2021 were monitored using standard anesthesia monitoring, processed electroencephalography (pEEG) monitoring using Narcotrend 3-lead frontal EEGs (Narcotrend, Hannover, Germany), and bilateral ankle actimetry (SOMNOwatch™ plus). Sedation was administered according to our institutional protocol, beginning with a dexmedetomidine loading dose (0.5 µg kg⁻¹), followed by titration of the infusion between 0.2 and 1.5 µg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹. Additional propofol or fentanyl boluses were administered as clinically indicated by the responsible anesthesiologist. Actimetry, EEG patterns, and intraoperative events were analyzed. PLMs (2–6 movements/min; most commonly 3–5 movements/min) were observed in 20 of 35 patients (57%) and all conversions to general anesthesia (5/5, 100%) occurred in the PLM-positive group, highlighting a potential clinical impact on procedural stability. In the 19 patients with complete EEG datasets, Narcotrend indices during dexmedetomidine-only sedation averaged 96.6 ± 2.6, consistent with an awake–sedate EEG pattern. Following propofol administration, the index decreased to 39.3 ± 20.0, corresponding to a very large effect size (Cohen’s d = 2.85). Five conversions to general anesthesia were necessary in patients with PLMs, because of restlessness, although the severity of PLMs did not predict conversion. No patient had a known history of restless legs syndrome (RLS); prior neurological disease showed no consistent association with PLM occurrence. PLMs are common during dexmedetomidine sedation for TAVI in elderly patients and may need conversion to general anesthesia. While dexmedetomidine offers cognitive benefits, the potential for movement-related procedural risk warrants increased monitoring and consideration during patient selection and anesthetic planning. Further studies comparing sedation-induced and natural sleep PLMs are needed.

老年患者镇静和全身麻醉期间周期性肢体运动:一项前瞻性观察研究。
右美托咪定镇静对老年患者的认知益处是由于其仿生非快速眼动(NREM)睡眠样状态。然而,这种状态可能使患者易发生周期性肢体运动(PLMs),这可能在镇静期间引起意外的手术风险。我们的目的是确定在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)中以右美托咪定为基础的多模式镇静期间PLMs的发生率,并探讨其与是否需要转换为全身麻醉的关系。在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,从2021年10月至2021年11月底,35名连续接受TAVI的患者(平均年龄81±6岁,17名女性,18名男性)使用标准麻醉监测、使用Narcotrend 3导联额叶脑电图(德国汉诺威,Narcotrend)的处理脑电图(pEEG)监测和双侧踝关节活动测量(SOMNOwatch™plus)进行监测。镇静是根据我们的机构方案进行的,从右美托咪定负荷剂量开始(0.5µg kg⁻¹),然后滴注0.2到1.5µg kg⁻¹。由负责的麻醉师根据临床指示给予额外的异丙酚或芬太尼丸。分析活动测量、脑电图模式和术中事件。35例患者中有20例(57%)观察到plm(2-6次/分钟,最常见的是3-5次/分钟),所有转到全麻(5/ 5,100%)发生在plm阳性组,突出了对手术稳定性的潜在临床影响。在19例具有完整脑电图数据的患者中,右美托咪定镇静期间的麻醉趋势指数平均为96.6±2.6,符合清醒-镇静脑电图模式。异丙酚给药后,该指数降至39.3±20.0,对应于非常大的效应量(Cohen’s d = 2.85)。由于躁动,PLMs患者需要5次全麻转换,尽管PLMs的严重程度并不能预测转换。无患者有不宁腿综合征(RLS)病史;既往神经系统疾病与PLM的发生没有一致的关联。在老年TAVI患者右美托咪定镇静期间,PLMs是常见的,可能需要转换为全身麻醉。虽然右美托咪定提供认知益处,但潜在的运动相关程序风险需要在患者选择和麻醉计划期间加强监测和考虑。需要进一步的研究来比较镇静诱导和自然睡眠的PLMs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书