Comparative Clinical Outcomes of Iron Sucrose and Ferric Carboxymaltose in the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia.

IF 0.9 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Wasim S El Nekidy, Khaled Aldhanhani, Lavinia Salama, Emna Abidi, Abdullah Shatnawei, Ziad Sadik, Muriel Ghosn, Zaher Koutoubi, Fadi Hijazi, Jihad Mallat
{"title":"Comparative Clinical Outcomes of Iron Sucrose and Ferric Carboxymaltose in the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia.","authors":"Wasim S El Nekidy, Khaled Aldhanhani, Lavinia Salama, Emna Abidi, Abdullah Shatnawei, Ziad Sadik, Muriel Ghosn, Zaher Koutoubi, Fadi Hijazi, Jihad Mallat","doi":"10.1177/00185787261419041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Data comparing clinical outcomes of different intravenous iron products is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of iron sucrose (IS) and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) on hemoglobin levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at our quaternary care hospital between May 2015 and June 2019. Adults who received either of the study drugs were included in the analysis. Only the first encounter was used for patients who received multiple iron courses. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare outcomes versus baseline medians in each group separately, while Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test was used to compare the change between baseline and outcome medians between both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 643 patients were included in the analysis, with 311 receiving iron sucrose (IS) and 332 receiving ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). The median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 1 (0-5) for IS and 4 (0-7) for FCM (<i>P</i> < .001). Both iron products significantly increased hemoglobin levels by the end of the study compared to baseline, from 93 (84-105) to 114 (99-127) g/L (<i>P</i> < .001) in the IS group and from 92 (81-103) to 103 (87-117) g/L (<i>P</i> < .001) in the FCM group. Additionally, the change in hemoglobin was significantly more pronounced with IS 16.5 (5-29) g/L versus 6.5 (-1 to 21) g/L for FCM (<i>P</i> < .001). Stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that baseline hemoglobin [β = 0.52 (0.4-0.6); <i>P</i> < .001], erythrocyte stimulating agents use [β = -7.4 (-11 to -3.8); <i>P</i> < .001], total iron product dose [β = 0.01 (0.01-0.02); <i>P</i> < .001], blood transfusion [β = -9.5 (-12 to -6.6); <i>P</i> < .001], CCI [β = -0.6 (-1 to -0.12); <i>P</i> = .013], and FCM [β = -9.5 (-12 to -6.6); <i>P</i> < .001] were the main predictors of hemoglobin level at the end of the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple factors were shown to affect hemoglobin levels, which need to be considered when managing anemia, including the type of iron formulation used. Our findings need to be verified in larger prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"00185787261419041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12926091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787261419041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Data comparing clinical outcomes of different intravenous iron products is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of iron sucrose (IS) and ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) on hemoglobin levels.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at our quaternary care hospital between May 2015 and June 2019. Adults who received either of the study drugs were included in the analysis. Only the first encounter was used for patients who received multiple iron courses. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare outcomes versus baseline medians in each group separately, while Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the change between baseline and outcome medians between both groups.

Results: A total of 643 patients were included in the analysis, with 311 receiving iron sucrose (IS) and 332 receiving ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). The median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 1 (0-5) for IS and 4 (0-7) for FCM (P < .001). Both iron products significantly increased hemoglobin levels by the end of the study compared to baseline, from 93 (84-105) to 114 (99-127) g/L (P < .001) in the IS group and from 92 (81-103) to 103 (87-117) g/L (P < .001) in the FCM group. Additionally, the change in hemoglobin was significantly more pronounced with IS 16.5 (5-29) g/L versus 6.5 (-1 to 21) g/L for FCM (P < .001). Stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that baseline hemoglobin [β = 0.52 (0.4-0.6); P < .001], erythrocyte stimulating agents use [β = -7.4 (-11 to -3.8); P < .001], total iron product dose [β = 0.01 (0.01-0.02); P < .001], blood transfusion [β = -9.5 (-12 to -6.6); P < .001], CCI [β = -0.6 (-1 to -0.12); P = .013], and FCM [β = -9.5 (-12 to -6.6); P < .001] were the main predictors of hemoglobin level at the end of the study.

Conclusion: Multiple factors were shown to affect hemoglobin levels, which need to be considered when managing anemia, including the type of iron formulation used. Our findings need to be verified in larger prospective studies.

蔗糖铁与羧麦芽糖铁治疗缺铁性贫血的临床效果比较。
目的:比较不同静脉铁制品临床疗效的资料有限。本研究的目的是比较蔗糖铁(IS)和羧麦芽糖铁(FCM)对血红蛋白水平的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性研究于2015年5月至2019年6月在我院第四护理医院进行。接受任何一种研究药物的成年人都被纳入分析。只有第一次接触被用于接受多个铁疗程的患者。采用Wilcoxon sign -rank检验分别比较各组结果和基线中位数,采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较两组基线和结果中位数的变化。结果:共纳入643例患者,其中蔗糖铁(IS) 311例,羧麦芽糖铁(FCM) 332例。IS的中位Charlson共病指数(CCI)为1 (0-5),FCM的中位Charlson共病指数(CCI)为4(0-7)。[013], FCM [β = -9.5 (-12 ~ -6.6);结论:多种因素影响血红蛋白水平,在治疗贫血时需要考虑这些因素,包括所使用的铁制剂的类型。我们的发现需要在更大的前瞻性研究中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书