Convergence and divergence of molecular mechanisms in Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity.

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-02-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnsyn.2026.1761008
Kira M Feighan, Harshit K Thakare, Stephen D Glasgow, Timothy E Kennedy
{"title":"Convergence and divergence of molecular mechanisms in Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity.","authors":"Kira M Feighan, Harshit K Thakare, Stephen D Glasgow, Timothy E Kennedy","doi":"10.3389/fnsyn.2026.1761008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The umbrella of synaptic plasticity includes associative, activity-dependent alterations in synaptic strength that are thought to underlie learning and memory, and negative feedback that stabilizes network activity, termed Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity, respectively. These forms of plasticity respond to activity oppositely, and on different spatial and temporal scales. However, despite these fundamental differences, many similar molecular mechanisms are engaged by each form of plasticity to alter synaptic strength. Here, we review molecular mechanisms involved in homeostatic plasticity and compare their involvement in Hebbian plasticity. We focus on synaptic scaling, long-term potentiation, and long-term depression, which are mediated by regulation of post-synaptic amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate-type glutamate receptor (AMPARs) accumulation. Addressing synaptic scaffolding, intracellular signaling, cell-adhesion, and secreted factors, we identify mechanisms that appear to be convergent, differentially engaged, and divergent that uniquely regulate homeostatic scaling. These comparisons identify clear gaps to be addressed by future studies that aim to parse the contributions of Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity to regulate AMPAR function.</p>","PeriodicalId":12650,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1761008"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12926376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2026.1761008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The umbrella of synaptic plasticity includes associative, activity-dependent alterations in synaptic strength that are thought to underlie learning and memory, and negative feedback that stabilizes network activity, termed Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity, respectively. These forms of plasticity respond to activity oppositely, and on different spatial and temporal scales. However, despite these fundamental differences, many similar molecular mechanisms are engaged by each form of plasticity to alter synaptic strength. Here, we review molecular mechanisms involved in homeostatic plasticity and compare their involvement in Hebbian plasticity. We focus on synaptic scaling, long-term potentiation, and long-term depression, which are mediated by regulation of post-synaptic amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate-type glutamate receptor (AMPARs) accumulation. Addressing synaptic scaffolding, intracellular signaling, cell-adhesion, and secreted factors, we identify mechanisms that appear to be convergent, differentially engaged, and divergent that uniquely regulate homeostatic scaling. These comparisons identify clear gaps to be addressed by future studies that aim to parse the contributions of Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity to regulate AMPAR function.

Hebbian和稳态可塑性分子机制的趋同与分化。
突触可塑性的范畴包括联想性的、活动依赖性的突触强度变化,这些变化被认为是学习和记忆的基础,以及稳定网络活动的负反馈,分别被称为Hebbian可塑性和稳态可塑性。这些形式的可塑性对活动的反应是相反的,在不同的空间和时间尺度上。然而,尽管存在这些基本差异,但每种形式的可塑性都参与了许多相似的分子机制来改变突触强度。在此,我们综述了参与稳态可塑性的分子机制,并比较了它们在Hebbian可塑性中的作用。我们关注突触尺度、长时程增强和长时程抑制是由突触后氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑-丙酸型谷氨酸受体(AMPARs)积累调控介导的。针对突触支架、细胞内信号、细胞粘附和分泌因子,我们确定了似乎是趋同的、差异参与的和发散的机制,这些机制独特地调节了稳态缩放。这些比较确定了明确的差距,未来的研究旨在分析Hebbian和稳态可塑性对调节AMPAR功能的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
74
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书