Comparison of prognosis in emergency department elderly septic shock patients with initial hypotension versus delayed hypotension.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
European Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001317
Chaeeun Lee, Gil Joon Suh, Sung-Hyuk Choi, Sung Phil Chung, Won Young Kim, Tae Ho Lim, Sangchun Choi, Tae Gun Shin, Sangun Nah, Sangsoo Han
{"title":"Comparison of prognosis in emergency department elderly septic shock patients with initial hypotension versus delayed hypotension.","authors":"Chaeeun Lee, Gil Joon Suh, Sung-Hyuk Choi, Sung Phil Chung, Won Young Kim, Tae Ho Lim, Sangchun Choi, Tae Gun Shin, Sangun Nah, Sangsoo Han","doi":"10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and importance: </strong>Hypotension and advanced-age are significant risk factors for increased sepsis-related mortality. However, the relationship between the timing of hypotension in the emergency department (ED) and the prognosis of elderly patients with septic shock is little understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effect of hypotension on arrival at the ED with the prognosis of elderly patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Design, settings, and participants: </strong>A retrospective analysis of a multicenter registry that was prospectively collected from 12 EDs. Patients aged older than 65 years who were diagnosed with septic shock requiring vasopressor support from October 2015 to December 2022 were included. Hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg or a mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg. Based on the timing of the first hypotension episode, patients were divided into two groups: the initial hypotension group (hypotension on arrival at the ED) and the delayed hypotension group (developed hypotension while staying in the ED).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and analysis: </strong>The primary outcome was 28-day mortality of elderly patients with septic shock, and the secondary outcomes were ICU admission, mechanical ventilation within 24 h, and renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 24 h. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the association between initial hypotension and the outcomes. A Kaplan-Meier curve was constructed to investigate the survival probabilities of the patients.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>This study included 1444 patients [868 (60.1%) with initial hypotension and 576 (39.9%) with delayed hypotension]. Initial hypotension was significantly associated with 28-day mortality [hazard ratio: 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.45, P  = 0.049]. However, initial hypotension was not associated with ICU admission (hazard ratio: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.96-1.33, P  = 0.154), mechanical ventilation within 24 h (hazard ratio: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.69-1.06, P  = 0.147), or RRT within 24 h (hazard ratio: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.76-1.46, P  = 0.775).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the prognostic value of initial hypotension in elderly patients with septic shock, showing its association with a high risk of 28-day mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":11893,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"169-175"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance: Hypotension and advanced-age are significant risk factors for increased sepsis-related mortality. However, the relationship between the timing of hypotension in the emergency department (ED) and the prognosis of elderly patients with septic shock is little understood.

Objective: To determine the effect of hypotension on arrival at the ED with the prognosis of elderly patients with septic shock.

Design, settings, and participants: A retrospective analysis of a multicenter registry that was prospectively collected from 12 EDs. Patients aged older than 65 years who were diagnosed with septic shock requiring vasopressor support from October 2015 to December 2022 were included. Hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg or a mean arterial pressure less than 65 mmHg. Based on the timing of the first hypotension episode, patients were divided into two groups: the initial hypotension group (hypotension on arrival at the ED) and the delayed hypotension group (developed hypotension while staying in the ED).

Outcome measures and analysis: The primary outcome was 28-day mortality of elderly patients with septic shock, and the secondary outcomes were ICU admission, mechanical ventilation within 24 h, and renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 24 h. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze the association between initial hypotension and the outcomes. A Kaplan-Meier curve was constructed to investigate the survival probabilities of the patients.

Main results: This study included 1444 patients [868 (60.1%) with initial hypotension and 576 (39.9%) with delayed hypotension]. Initial hypotension was significantly associated with 28-day mortality [hazard ratio: 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.45, P  = 0.049]. However, initial hypotension was not associated with ICU admission (hazard ratio: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.96-1.33, P  = 0.154), mechanical ventilation within 24 h (hazard ratio: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.69-1.06, P  = 0.147), or RRT within 24 h (hazard ratio: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.76-1.46, P  = 0.775).

Conclusion: This study highlights the prognostic value of initial hypotension in elderly patients with septic shock, showing its association with a high risk of 28-day mortality.

急诊科老年感染性休克初始性低血压与迟发性低血压的预后比较。
背景和重要性:低血压和高龄是脓毒症相关死亡率增加的重要危险因素。然而,急诊科(ED)低血压时机与老年脓毒性休克患者预后的关系尚不清楚。目的:探讨低血压对老年感染性休克患者到达急诊科与预后的影响。设计、设置和参与者:对前瞻性收集的12个急诊患者的多中心注册表进行回顾性分析。纳入了2015年10月至2022年12月诊断为感染性休克需要血管加压剂支持的65岁以上患者。低血压的定义是收缩压低于90mmhg或平均动脉压低于65mmhg。根据首次低血压发作的时间,将患者分为两组:初始低血压组(到达急诊科时出现低血压)和延迟性低血压组(在急诊科停留期间出现低血压)。结果测量与分析:主要结果为老年感染性休克患者28天死亡率,次要结果为ICU入院,24 h内机械通气,24 h内肾替代治疗(RRT)。采用多变量Cox比例风险模型分析初始低血压与预后之间的关系。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线分析患者的生存概率。主要结果:本研究纳入1444例患者[首发低血压868例(60.1%),迟发性低血压576例(39.9%)]。初始低血压与28天死亡率显著相关[风险比:1.20,95%可信区间(CI): 1.00-1.45, P = 0.049]。然而,初次低血压与ICU入院(风险比:1.13,95% CI: 0.96-1.33, P = 0.154)、24 h内机械通气(风险比:0.85,95% CI: 0.69-1.06, P = 0.147)或24 h内RRT(风险比:1.05,95% CI: 0.76-1.46, P = 0.775)无关。结论:本研究强调了初始低血压对老年脓毒性休克患者的预后价值,显示其与28天死亡率高风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Emergency Medicine is the official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine. It is devoted to serving the European emergency medicine community and to promoting European standards of training, diagnosis and care in this rapidly growing field. Published bimonthly, the Journal offers original papers on all aspects of acute injury and sudden illness, including: emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, cardiology, disaster medicine, intensive care, internal medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics, toxicology and trauma care. It addresses issues on the organization of emergency services in hospitals and in the community and examines postgraduate training from European and global perspectives. The Journal also publishes papers focusing on the different models of emergency healthcare delivery in Europe and beyond. With a multidisciplinary approach, the European Journal of Emergency Medicine publishes scientific research, topical reviews, news of meetings and events of interest to the emergency medicine community. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书