Comparative cost per responder analysis of ciltacabtagene autoleucel and real-world standard of care therapy in patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma.
Doris K Hansen, Xiaoxiao Lu, Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Eileen Zhang, Saad Z Usmani, Rameet Sachdev, Matthew Perciavalle, Denise De Wiest, Stephen Huo, Seina Lee, Zaina P Qureshi, Sundar Jagannath
{"title":"Comparative cost per responder analysis of ciltacabtagene autoleucel and real-world standard of care therapy in patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma.","authors":"Doris K Hansen, Xiaoxiao Lu, Omar Castaneda Puglianini, Eileen Zhang, Saad Z Usmani, Rameet Sachdev, Matthew Perciavalle, Denise De Wiest, Stephen Huo, Seina Lee, Zaina P Qureshi, Sundar Jagannath","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2026.2634771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy currently approved for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This study aimed to assess the value of cilta-cel against a real-world standard of care (RW-SoC) basket using a novel cost per responder (CPR) model.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The model was aligned with the patient population in the CARTITUDE-4 trial and incorporated progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS), and death states. The base-case analysis was conducted from a mixed US payer perspective with a 36-month time horizon, and modeled outcomes included the total cost per treated patient, total cost per complete responder, and cost per month during PFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the base-case analysis, total cost per treated patient over 36 months was estimated to be lower for cilta-cel ($792,243) compared with RW-SoC ($815,023), with the difference driven predominantly by the lower costs for cilta-cel over the PPS period. Total costs per complete responder and per month during PFS were $1,070,599 and $25,203 for cilta-cel compared with $5,101,186 and $38,018, respectively, for RW-SoC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CPR model suggests that cilta-cel offers substantial clinical and economic benefit for patients with RRMM compared with RW-SoC therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"369-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2026.2634771","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy currently approved for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This study aimed to assess the value of cilta-cel against a real-world standard of care (RW-SoC) basket using a novel cost per responder (CPR) model.
Research design and methods: The model was aligned with the patient population in the CARTITUDE-4 trial and incorporated progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS), and death states. The base-case analysis was conducted from a mixed US payer perspective with a 36-month time horizon, and modeled outcomes included the total cost per treated patient, total cost per complete responder, and cost per month during PFS.
Results: In the base-case analysis, total cost per treated patient over 36 months was estimated to be lower for cilta-cel ($792,243) compared with RW-SoC ($815,023), with the difference driven predominantly by the lower costs for cilta-cel over the PPS period. Total costs per complete responder and per month during PFS were $1,070,599 and $25,203 for cilta-cel compared with $5,101,186 and $38,018, respectively, for RW-SoC.
Conclusions: The CPR model suggests that cilta-cel offers substantial clinical and economic benefit for patients with RRMM compared with RW-SoC therapies.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.