A 19-year-old woman with intermittent headache and dizziness and a large temporal lobe mass

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Pathology Pub Date : 2026-08-02 Epub Date: 2026-02-24 DOI:10.1111/bpa.70085
Sha-Sha Hu, Wei Yan, Bo Wang
{"title":"A 19-year-old woman with intermittent headache and dizziness and a large temporal lobe mass","authors":"Sha-Sha Hu,&nbsp;Wei Yan,&nbsp;Bo Wang","doi":"10.1111/bpa.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A 19-year-old woman had a 3-month history of intermittent headaches and dizziness. MRI revealed a 7.7 × 6.8 × 6.2 cm right temporal lobe mass involving the choroid plexus, compressing the lateral ventricle with midline shift. The lesion was T1-hypointense (Figure 1), T2-hyperintense, heterogeneously enhancing with mild diffusion restriction. Intraoperatively, the tumor was located in the temporal lobe parenchyma, extending into the lateral ventricle without a capsule. Subsequently, the patient underwent microscopic total tumor resection.</p><p>Pathological examination revealed an ependymoma-like pattern, characterized by perivascular pseudorosettes (Figure 2A, Box 1) and microcystic areas containing basophilic secretions (Figure 2B). The tumor exhibited high cellularity, nuclear atypia, and increased mitoses (up to 6/mm<sup>2</sup> in hotspots) in ependymoma-like pattern regions. Necrosis (Figure 2A, inset) and hyalinized stroma (Figure 2B, inset) were seen locally. Although supratentorial ependymoma was initially suspected, the diagnosis was not fully supported by the minimal focal expression of GFAP, EMA, and S100, along with negative FISH testing for <i>ZFTA::RELA</i>. Meanwhile, RNA-seq identified only a <i>SAMD5::SASH1</i> fusion transcript (Figure 2F). An extensive immunohistochemical panel showed diffuse positivity for BCOR (Figure 2C), vimentin (Figure 2C, inset), CD56 (Figure 2D, inset), and CD99, and a Ki-67 index of 40% (Figure 2D), suggesting a CNS tumor with <i>BCOR</i> internal tandem duplication (ITD). Subsequent whole-genome sequencing confirmed a heterozygous ITD in <i>BCOR</i> exon 15 (Figure 2E). No hotspot mutations (e.g., in <i>IDH1/2</i>, <i>TERT</i>, <i>ATRX</i>, <i>TP53</i>, <i>CDKN2A/B</i>) or structural variations (e.g., in <i>MN1</i> or <i>CIC</i>) were detected.</p><p>Postoperatively, she underwent radiotherapy (56Gy/28f) for 1 year without signs of local recurrence. One year after radiotherapy, she began to experience a persistent cough, dyspnea, and CT scan showed multiple lung nodules and left pleural effusion, pathologically confirmed as metastases. Despite aggressive treatment and chemotherapy, she succumbed to respiratory failure 1 month later.</p><p>CNS tumor with <i>BCOR</i> internal tandem duplication (ITD).</p><p>The 2021 WHO classification defines CNS tumors with <i>BCOR</i> ITD as malignant embryonal neoplasms of uncertain origin, characterized by a heterozygous ITD in <i>BCOR</i> exon 15 and a solid growth patterns of oval-spindle cells with a dense capillary network and focal pseudorosettes [<span>1</span>]. <i>BCOR</i> ITDs also occur in certain sarcomas, such as primitive myxoid mesenchymal tumor of infancy, clear cell sarcoma of the kidney, and undifferentiated round cell sarcomas in infants, and the nosological relationship among these entities continues to be debated [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Somatic heterozygous <i>BCOR</i> ITD is a key oncogenic driver, often as the sole alteration, although additional mutations in <i>EP300</i>, <i>SMARCA2</i>, <i>STAG2</i>, and <i>BCORL1</i> may contribute [<span>2</span>]. These CNS tumors have poor prognosis, and gross total resection serves as a favorable prognostic factor [<span>2</span>]. Their clinical course is aggressive yet heterogeneous. In one cohort (<i>n</i> = 24), overall survival was poor (8 deaths; survival range: 0.2–6.3 years) [<span>1, 2</span>] and among the 19 patients with follow-up data, 9 (47.4%) experienced recurrence at variable intervals [<span>2</span>]. While metastatic disease at diagnosis is unreported, leptomeningeal dissemination, bone metastases, and inoculation metastases along the neurosurgical access route have been observed at relapse [<span>1</span>]. Notably, some patients achieved long-term survival, with disease-free follow-up exceeding 14 years in one case, and may respond favorably to multimodal therapy [<span>2</span>].</p><p><i>SAMD5::SASH1</i> fusion is a novel entity with an unknown pathogenic mechanism. Its identification in advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer and sarcoma [<span>3</span>] suggests it is an oncogenic fusion potentially linked to metastasis, a hypothesis requiring experimental validation.</p><p>Extracranial metastasis (ECM) in high-grade primary CNS tumors is exceptionally rare, leading to unpredictable symptoms and often underrecognition. Common sites of ECM include the lungs, pleura, lymph nodes, bones, bone marrow, and liver. Its infrequency results from the typically rapid and often fatal intracranial progression, which precludes clinical ECM presentation, along with the protective barriers of the CNS (e.g., the blood–brain barrier and sparse extracellular matrix) that limit tumor cell escape, and the potential inability of disseminated cells to survive in distant organ niches. Proposed mechanisms for ECM include neurosurgical intervention, hematogenous dissemination, and lymphatic spread. While neurosurgery may facilitate seeding, cases in treatment-naïve patients indicate some tumors have innate metastatic potential, with surgery acting as an accelerator or revealing event. Therefore, vigilant monitoring for signs of metastatic spread in patients with high-grade CNS tumors is crucial, as early detection could potentially improve survival rates.</p><p>Sha-Sha Hu wrote the main manuscript text. Wei Yan and Bo Wang revised the manuscript. Sha-Sha Hu performed the histological and immunohistological analysis. Sha-Sha Hu and Wei Yan analyzed the molecular assay results. Sha-Sha Hu and Bo Wang reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the paper.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9290,"journal":{"name":"Brain Pathology","volume":"36 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bpa.70085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bpa.70085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A 19-year-old woman had a 3-month history of intermittent headaches and dizziness. MRI revealed a 7.7 × 6.8 × 6.2 cm right temporal lobe mass involving the choroid plexus, compressing the lateral ventricle with midline shift. The lesion was T1-hypointense (Figure 1), T2-hyperintense, heterogeneously enhancing with mild diffusion restriction. Intraoperatively, the tumor was located in the temporal lobe parenchyma, extending into the lateral ventricle without a capsule. Subsequently, the patient underwent microscopic total tumor resection.

Pathological examination revealed an ependymoma-like pattern, characterized by perivascular pseudorosettes (Figure 2A, Box 1) and microcystic areas containing basophilic secretions (Figure 2B). The tumor exhibited high cellularity, nuclear atypia, and increased mitoses (up to 6/mm2 in hotspots) in ependymoma-like pattern regions. Necrosis (Figure 2A, inset) and hyalinized stroma (Figure 2B, inset) were seen locally. Although supratentorial ependymoma was initially suspected, the diagnosis was not fully supported by the minimal focal expression of GFAP, EMA, and S100, along with negative FISH testing for ZFTA::RELA. Meanwhile, RNA-seq identified only a SAMD5::SASH1 fusion transcript (Figure 2F). An extensive immunohistochemical panel showed diffuse positivity for BCOR (Figure 2C), vimentin (Figure 2C, inset), CD56 (Figure 2D, inset), and CD99, and a Ki-67 index of 40% (Figure 2D), suggesting a CNS tumor with BCOR internal tandem duplication (ITD). Subsequent whole-genome sequencing confirmed a heterozygous ITD in BCOR exon 15 (Figure 2E). No hotspot mutations (e.g., in IDH1/2, TERT, ATRX, TP53, CDKN2A/B) or structural variations (e.g., in MN1 or CIC) were detected.

Postoperatively, she underwent radiotherapy (56Gy/28f) for 1 year without signs of local recurrence. One year after radiotherapy, she began to experience a persistent cough, dyspnea, and CT scan showed multiple lung nodules and left pleural effusion, pathologically confirmed as metastases. Despite aggressive treatment and chemotherapy, she succumbed to respiratory failure 1 month later.

CNS tumor with BCOR internal tandem duplication (ITD).

The 2021 WHO classification defines CNS tumors with BCOR ITD as malignant embryonal neoplasms of uncertain origin, characterized by a heterozygous ITD in BCOR exon 15 and a solid growth patterns of oval-spindle cells with a dense capillary network and focal pseudorosettes [1]. BCOR ITDs also occur in certain sarcomas, such as primitive myxoid mesenchymal tumor of infancy, clear cell sarcoma of the kidney, and undifferentiated round cell sarcomas in infants, and the nosological relationship among these entities continues to be debated [1].

Somatic heterozygous BCOR ITD is a key oncogenic driver, often as the sole alteration, although additional mutations in EP300, SMARCA2, STAG2, and BCORL1 may contribute [2]. These CNS tumors have poor prognosis, and gross total resection serves as a favorable prognostic factor [2]. Their clinical course is aggressive yet heterogeneous. In one cohort (n = 24), overall survival was poor (8 deaths; survival range: 0.2–6.3 years) [1, 2] and among the 19 patients with follow-up data, 9 (47.4%) experienced recurrence at variable intervals [2]. While metastatic disease at diagnosis is unreported, leptomeningeal dissemination, bone metastases, and inoculation metastases along the neurosurgical access route have been observed at relapse [1]. Notably, some patients achieved long-term survival, with disease-free follow-up exceeding 14 years in one case, and may respond favorably to multimodal therapy [2].

SAMD5::SASH1 fusion is a novel entity with an unknown pathogenic mechanism. Its identification in advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer and sarcoma [3] suggests it is an oncogenic fusion potentially linked to metastasis, a hypothesis requiring experimental validation.

Extracranial metastasis (ECM) in high-grade primary CNS tumors is exceptionally rare, leading to unpredictable symptoms and often underrecognition. Common sites of ECM include the lungs, pleura, lymph nodes, bones, bone marrow, and liver. Its infrequency results from the typically rapid and often fatal intracranial progression, which precludes clinical ECM presentation, along with the protective barriers of the CNS (e.g., the blood–brain barrier and sparse extracellular matrix) that limit tumor cell escape, and the potential inability of disseminated cells to survive in distant organ niches. Proposed mechanisms for ECM include neurosurgical intervention, hematogenous dissemination, and lymphatic spread. While neurosurgery may facilitate seeding, cases in treatment-naïve patients indicate some tumors have innate metastatic potential, with surgery acting as an accelerator or revealing event. Therefore, vigilant monitoring for signs of metastatic spread in patients with high-grade CNS tumors is crucial, as early detection could potentially improve survival rates.

Sha-Sha Hu wrote the main manuscript text. Wei Yan and Bo Wang revised the manuscript. Sha-Sha Hu performed the histological and immunohistological analysis. Sha-Sha Hu and Wei Yan analyzed the molecular assay results. Sha-Sha Hu and Bo Wang reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the paper.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Abstract Image

19岁女性间歇性头痛头晕颞叶肿块大。
一名19岁女性有3个月的间歇性头痛和头晕病史。MRI示右侧颞叶7.7 × 6.8 × 6.2 cm肿块累及脉络膜丛,压迫侧脑室中线移位。病变呈t1 -低信号(图1),t2 -高信号,不均匀增强,轻度扩散受限。术中,肿瘤位于颞叶实质,无包膜延伸至侧脑室。随后,患者行显微全肿瘤切除术。病理检查显示室管膜瘤样,特征为血管周围假性结节(图2A,框1)和含有嗜碱性分泌物的微囊区(图2B)。在室管膜瘤样区,肿瘤表现出高细胞性、核异型性和增加的有丝分裂(热点地区高达6/mm2)。局部可见坏死(图2A,插图)和透明质间质(图2B,插图)。虽然最初怀疑为幕上室管膜瘤,但GFAP、EMA和S100的最小局灶表达以及ZFTA::RELA的FISH检测阴性并不能完全支持诊断。同时,RNA-seq仅鉴定出SAMD5::SASH1融合转录物(图2F)。广泛免疫组化显示BCOR(图2C)、vimentin(图2C,插图)、CD56(图2D,插图)和CD99弥漫性阳性,Ki-67指数为40%(图2D),提示中枢神经系统肿瘤合并BCOR内部串联重复(ITD)。随后的全基因组测序证实了BCOR外显子15的杂合ITD(图2E)。未发现热点突变(如IDH1/2、TERT、ATRX、TP53、CDKN2A/B)或结构变异(如MN1或CIC)。术后接受56Gy/28f放疗1年,未见局部复发迹象。放疗后1年,患者出现持续咳嗽、呼吸困难,CT扫描示多发肺结节及左侧胸腔积液,病理证实为转移灶。尽管积极的治疗和化疗,1个月后她死于呼吸衰竭。中枢神经系统肿瘤合并BCOR内串联重复(ITD)。2021年WHO分类将伴有BCOR ITD的中枢神经系统肿瘤定义为来源不确定的恶性胚胎性肿瘤,其特征为BCOR外显子15的杂合ITD,卵形梭形细胞的固体生长模式,具有致密的毛细血管网络和局灶性假梭形细胞[1]。BCOR ITDs也发生在某些肉瘤中,如婴儿原始黏液样间充质瘤、肾脏透明细胞肉瘤和婴儿未分化圆细胞肉瘤,这些实体之间的病原学关系仍在争论中。体细胞杂合子BCOR ITD是一个关键的致癌驱动因素,通常是唯一的改变,尽管EP300、SMARCA2、STAG2和BCORL1的其他突变可能有助于[2]。这些中枢神经系统肿瘤预后较差,大体全切除是一个有利的预后因素。它们的临床病程具有侵袭性但异质性。在一个队列(n = 24)中,总生存期较差(8例死亡,生存期0.2-6.3年)[1,2],在随访资料的19例患者中,9例(47.4%)在不同的时间间隔[2]复发。虽然诊断时的转移性疾病未见报道,但在复发时已观察到轻脑膜播散、骨转移和沿神经外科通路的接种转移。值得注意的是,一些患者实现了长期生存,其中一例无病随访超过14年,并且可能对多模式治疗反应良好。SAMD5::SASH1融合是一种致病机制未知的新实体。它在晚期/转移性结直肠癌和肉瘤[3]中的发现表明它是一种可能与转移有关的致癌融合,这一假设需要实验验证。高级别原发性中枢神经系统肿瘤的颅外转移(ECM)非常罕见,导致不可预测的症状和经常被忽视。ECM的常见部位包括肺、胸膜、淋巴结、骨、骨髓和肝脏。其罕见的原因是典型的快速且经常致命的颅内进展,排除了临床ECM表现,以及中枢神经系统的保护屏障(例如,血脑屏障和稀疏的细胞外基质)限制了肿瘤细胞的逃逸,以及弥散细胞在远处器官壁龛中生存的潜在能力。ECM的机制包括神经外科干预、血液播散和淋巴扩散。虽然神经外科手术可能有助于播种,但treatment-naïve患者的病例表明,一些肿瘤具有先天的转移潜力,手术可作为加速器或揭示事件。因此,警惕监测高级别中枢神经系统肿瘤患者转移扩散的迹象是至关重要的,因为早期发现可能会提高生存率。 胡莎莎写了主要的手稿文本。魏延和王博对原稿进行了修改。Sha-Sha Hu进行了组织学和免疫组织学分析。胡莎莎和闫伟分析了分子检测结果。胡莎莎和王波对原稿进行了审阅和编辑。所有作者都认可了论文的最终版本。作者声明无利益冲突。支持本研究结果的数据可向通讯作者索取。由于隐私或道德限制,这些数据不会公开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Pathology
Brain Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain Pathology is the journal of choice for biomedical scientists investigating diseases of the nervous system. The official journal of the International Society of Neuropathology, Brain Pathology is a peer-reviewed quarterly publication that includes original research, review articles and symposia focuses on the pathogenesis of neurological disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书