Bringing AI to the OR: integrating a machine learning predictive model in the EHR - a pilot on user-friendliness.

IF 6.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sara Ben Hmido, Ewout Ingwersen, Houssam Abder Rahim, Martin van Maanen, Sander Groot, Matthijs Schakel, Annika Rausch, Geert Kazemier, Freek Daams
{"title":"Bringing AI to the OR: integrating a machine learning predictive model in the EHR - a pilot on user-friendliness.","authors":"Sara Ben Hmido, Ewout Ingwersen, Houssam Abder Rahim, Martin van Maanen, Sander Groot, Matthijs Schakel, Annika Rausch, Geert Kazemier, Freek Daams","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evaluate the technical integration and usability of an intraoperative predictive machine learning model for colorectal anastomotic leakage within the Epic electronic health records (EHRs) at a single academic centre, with outputs blinded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The system used 28 data elements from patient records, intraoperative monitoring equipment and structured operating room (OR) observations. Data were collected every 15 min and processed in the cloud with encrypted, pseudonymised transfer. Usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and additional questions addressing access, clarity, responsiveness, workflow impact, safety and training needs. Convenience sampling was used, with all available OR staff involved in eligible procedures invited to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 procedures (9 October 2024 to 6 March 2025) were included. Nine unique users responded (≈75% of 12 exposed; four surgeons, five OR assistants). The interface was accessed in all cases, and predictions were generated each time from all three sources. Mean SUS was 79.2 (SD 10.4; 95% CI 71.2 to 87.2). Diagnostic items favoured access speed and clarity; prediction responsiveness scored lower.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The system could be implemented and operated reliably within a single centre and EHR environment and was perceived as easy to use, despite the small sample size. However, findings may not generalise to other hospitals or EHRs without adaptation and further multi-site evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The system functioned reliably and was positively received, supporting readiness for activation in real-time clinical use and prospective evaluation. Future deployment should incorporate regulatory planning and a quality-management framework to monitor performance, safety and changes in model behaviour over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12933791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate the technical integration and usability of an intraoperative predictive machine learning model for colorectal anastomotic leakage within the Epic electronic health records (EHRs) at a single academic centre, with outputs blinded.

Methods: The system used 28 data elements from patient records, intraoperative monitoring equipment and structured operating room (OR) observations. Data were collected every 15 min and processed in the cloud with encrypted, pseudonymised transfer. Usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and additional questions addressing access, clarity, responsiveness, workflow impact, safety and training needs. Convenience sampling was used, with all available OR staff involved in eligible procedures invited to participate.

Results: 15 procedures (9 October 2024 to 6 March 2025) were included. Nine unique users responded (≈75% of 12 exposed; four surgeons, five OR assistants). The interface was accessed in all cases, and predictions were generated each time from all three sources. Mean SUS was 79.2 (SD 10.4; 95% CI 71.2 to 87.2). Diagnostic items favoured access speed and clarity; prediction responsiveness scored lower.

Discussion: The system could be implemented and operated reliably within a single centre and EHR environment and was perceived as easy to use, despite the small sample size. However, findings may not generalise to other hospitals or EHRs without adaptation and further multi-site evaluation.

Conclusion: The system functioned reliably and was positively received, supporting readiness for activation in real-time clinical use and prospective evaluation. Future deployment should incorporate regulatory planning and a quality-management framework to monitor performance, safety and changes in model behaviour over time.

将人工智能带入手术室:在电子病历中集成机器学习预测模型-用户友好试点。
目的:评估单个学术中心Epic电子健康记录(EHRs)中结肠直肠吻合口漏术中预测机器学习模型的技术集成和可用性,输出为盲法。方法:系统使用患者病历、术中监护设备和结构化手术室(OR)观察的28个数据元素。数据每15分钟收集一次,并在云端以加密、假名传输的方式进行处理。可用性评估使用系统可用性量表(SUS)和附加问题解决访问,清晰度,响应能力,工作流程影响,安全性和培训需求。采用方便抽样,邀请所有符合条件的手术室工作人员参与。结果:纳入15例手术(2024年10月9日至2025年3月6日)。9个独立用户做出了回应(约占12个用户的75%;4个外科医生,5个手术室助理)。在所有情况下都访问了接口,并且每次都从所有三个源生成预测。平均SUS为79.2 (SD 10.4; 95% CI 71.2 - 87.2)。诊断项目有利于获取速度和清晰度;预测反应性得分较低。讨论:该系统可以在单一中心和电子病历环境中可靠地实施和操作,并且被认为易于使用,尽管样本量小。然而,如果没有适应和进一步的多地点评估,研究结果可能无法推广到其他医院或电子病历。结论:该系统运行可靠,受到好评,为实时临床应用和前瞻性评估提供了支持。未来的部署应该包括监管规划和质量管理框架,以监测性能、安全性和模型行为随时间的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书