{"title":"Navigating the Transition: A Scoping Review of System-Level Factors in Biosimilar Integration for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.","authors":"Shania Kumar, Nicola Dalbeth, Chiara Gasteiger","doi":"10.1007/s40259-026-00765-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases are routinely transitioned from originator biologics to biosimilars to reduce healthcare costs. While barriers related to patient and practitioner beliefs and knowledge are well-documented, less focus has been placed on system-level factors that may hinder biosimilar uptake.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This review aims to identify system-level factors that impact biosimilar brand transitions for treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, as reported by key stakeholders involved in real-world brand changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A comprehensive search was performed in APA PsycInfo, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, and databases for major conferences in rheumatology, dermatology, and gastroenterology. Data from relevant studies were extracted and summarized onto a structured coding sheet before being synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2301 articles screened, 47 journal articles and five conference abstracts were included. Most studies were conducted in the United States and focused primarily on rheumatology. Barriers and facilitators were organized into four overarching themes. These were regulatory and approval processes (e.g., tendering practices, interchangeability policies, prescriber guidelines), healthcare system policies and incentives (including quotas, insurance coverage, reimbursement mechanisms, and rebates), infrastructure and logistics (such as supply chain considerations and storage requirements), and communication and education (including media and expert influence and the involvement of patient organizations).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple components of the healthcare system play a role in successful biosimilar transitions. Leveraging regulations, policies, infrastructure, and communication before, during, and after transition offers a practical blueprint for managing brand changes across health systems and therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"301-315"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13017987/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioDrugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-026-00765-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases are routinely transitioned from originator biologics to biosimilars to reduce healthcare costs. While barriers related to patient and practitioner beliefs and knowledge are well-documented, less focus has been placed on system-level factors that may hinder biosimilar uptake.
Aims: This review aims to identify system-level factors that impact biosimilar brand transitions for treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, as reported by key stakeholders involved in real-world brand changes.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A comprehensive search was performed in APA PsycInfo, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, and databases for major conferences in rheumatology, dermatology, and gastroenterology. Data from relevant studies were extracted and summarized onto a structured coding sheet before being synthesized.
Results: Of 2301 articles screened, 47 journal articles and five conference abstracts were included. Most studies were conducted in the United States and focused primarily on rheumatology. Barriers and facilitators were organized into four overarching themes. These were regulatory and approval processes (e.g., tendering practices, interchangeability policies, prescriber guidelines), healthcare system policies and incentives (including quotas, insurance coverage, reimbursement mechanisms, and rebates), infrastructure and logistics (such as supply chain considerations and storage requirements), and communication and education (including media and expert influence and the involvement of patient organizations).
Conclusions: Multiple components of the healthcare system play a role in successful biosimilar transitions. Leveraging regulations, policies, infrastructure, and communication before, during, and after transition offers a practical blueprint for managing brand changes across health systems and therapies.
背景:患有免疫介导性炎症性疾病的患者通常会从原始生物制剂转向生物仿制药,以降低医疗成本。虽然与患者和医生的信念和知识相关的障碍是有据可查的,但对可能阻碍生物仿制药吸收的系统级因素的关注较少。目的:本综述旨在确定影响免疫介导炎症性疾病治疗的生物类似药品牌转变的系统级因素,如参与现实世界品牌变化的主要利益相关者所报告的。方法:根据Arksey和O'Malley框架进行范围评价,并根据系统评价和荟萃分析范围评价指南的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行报告。在APA PsycInfo、Embase、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science以及风湿病学、皮肤病学和胃肠病学主要会议的数据库中进行了全面的搜索。在合成之前,将相关研究的数据提取并汇总到结构化的编码表中。结果:在筛选的2301篇文章中,纳入47篇期刊文章和5篇会议摘要。大多数研究是在美国进行的,主要集中在风湿病学上。障碍和促进因素分为四个总体主题。这些包括监管和审批程序(例如招标做法、互换性政策、处方指南)、医疗保健系统政策和激励措施(包括配额、保险覆盖范围、报销机制和回扣)、基础设施和物流(例如供应链考虑和存储要求)、沟通和教育(包括媒体和专家影响以及患者组织的参与)。结论:医疗保健系统的多个组成部分在成功的生物仿制药过渡中发挥作用。在过渡之前、期间和之后利用法规、政策、基础设施和沟通,为管理卫生系统和疗法之间的品牌变化提供了一个实用的蓝图。
期刊介绍:
An essential resource for R&D professionals and clinicians with an interest in biologic therapies.
BioDrugs covers the development and therapeutic application of biotechnology-based pharmaceuticals and diagnostic products for the treatment of human disease.
BioDrugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.