Reproductive Success in Beef Cows: Bayesian Evaluation of Genotype and Herbage Allowance Under Grazing Conditions.

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Rodrigo Vivián, Raquel Pérez-Clariget, Ana Carolina Espasandín
{"title":"Reproductive Success in Beef Cows: Bayesian Evaluation of Genotype and Herbage Allowance Under Grazing Conditions.","authors":"Rodrigo Vivián, Raquel Pérez-Clariget, Ana Carolina Espasandín","doi":"10.1111/jbg.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reproductive losses from breeding to weaning jeopardise productivity and sustainability in extensive beef cattle systems. This study evaluated the effects of cow genotype (purebred vs. crossbred) and herbage allowance (high vs. low) on reproductive success across three biologically relevant periods: (I) breeding to pregnancy diagnosis, (II) pregnancy diagnosis to calving and (III) calving to weaning. A total of 1069 reproductive events from Hereford, Angus and reciprocal crossbred cows were analysed between 2007 and 2022 under native pasture conditions in Uruguay. Bayesian generalised linear mixed models were applied to estimate posterior probabilities of reproductive success, accounting for repeated measures and individual cow effects. Crossbred cows consistently exhibited higher probabilities of success than purebreds across all reproductive periods. Under low herbage allowance, the crossbred advantage was most pronounced in Period III (Δ = 0.22; P (Δ > 0) = 1.00), followed by Periods I and II (Δ ≈ 0.13; P (Δ > 0) ≥ 0.99), indicating a moderate genotype × nutrition interaction. High herbage allowance improved outcomes for all cows, particularly during the calving-to-weaning stage. Cumulative probabilities (weaned/served) were approximately 0.43 for purebred-low, 0.63 for purebred-high and 0.78 for crossbreds under both herbage levels, corresponding to 30-35 more calves weaned per 100 cows served when using crossbred females. These results demonstrate that both crossbreeding and adequate herbage allowance enhance reproductive performance under grazing conditions and offer robust, cost-effective strategies to improve efficiency and resilience in extensive beef production systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":54885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.70044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reproductive losses from breeding to weaning jeopardise productivity and sustainability in extensive beef cattle systems. This study evaluated the effects of cow genotype (purebred vs. crossbred) and herbage allowance (high vs. low) on reproductive success across three biologically relevant periods: (I) breeding to pregnancy diagnosis, (II) pregnancy diagnosis to calving and (III) calving to weaning. A total of 1069 reproductive events from Hereford, Angus and reciprocal crossbred cows were analysed between 2007 and 2022 under native pasture conditions in Uruguay. Bayesian generalised linear mixed models were applied to estimate posterior probabilities of reproductive success, accounting for repeated measures and individual cow effects. Crossbred cows consistently exhibited higher probabilities of success than purebreds across all reproductive periods. Under low herbage allowance, the crossbred advantage was most pronounced in Period III (Δ = 0.22; P (Δ > 0) = 1.00), followed by Periods I and II (Δ ≈ 0.13; P (Δ > 0) ≥ 0.99), indicating a moderate genotype × nutrition interaction. High herbage allowance improved outcomes for all cows, particularly during the calving-to-weaning stage. Cumulative probabilities (weaned/served) were approximately 0.43 for purebred-low, 0.63 for purebred-high and 0.78 for crossbreds under both herbage levels, corresponding to 30-35 more calves weaned per 100 cows served when using crossbred females. These results demonstrate that both crossbreeding and adequate herbage allowance enhance reproductive performance under grazing conditions and offer robust, cost-effective strategies to improve efficiency and resilience in extensive beef production systems.

肉牛繁殖成功:放牧条件下基因型和草料补给量的贝叶斯评价。
从繁殖到断奶的生殖损失危及粗放型肉牛系统的生产力和可持续性。本研究评估了奶牛基因型(纯种与杂交)和草料量(高与低)在三个生物学相关时期对繁殖成功率的影响:(I)育种至妊娠诊断,(II)妊娠诊断至产犊,(III)产犊至断奶。在2007年至2022年期间,在乌拉圭的原生牧场条件下,对赫里福德、安格斯和互惠杂交奶牛的1069个繁殖事件进行了分析。贝叶斯广义线性混合模型用于估计繁殖成功的后验概率,考虑到重复测量和个体奶牛的影响。在整个繁殖期内,杂交奶牛始终表现出比纯种奶牛更高的成功率。在低牧草用量条件下,杂种优势在第III期最为明显(Δ = 0.22; P (Δ > 0) = 1.00),其次是第I期和第II期(Δ≈0.13;P (Δ > 0)≥0.99),表明基因型与营养互作程度中等。高牧草补给量提高了所有奶牛的产量,特别是在产犊至断奶阶段。在两种牧草水平下,纯种低的累积概率(断奶/服役)约为0.43,纯种高的为0.63,杂交的为0.78,相当于每100头奶牛中使用杂交母牛可多断奶30-35头小牛。这些结果表明,杂交和充足的牧草补给量都能提高放牧条件下的繁殖性能,并为提高粗放型牛肉生产系统的效率和恢复力提供了强有力的、具有成本效益的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics publishes original articles by international scientists on genomic selection, and any other topic related to breeding programmes, selection, quantitative genetic, genomics, diversity and evolution of domestic animals. Researchers, teachers, and the animal breeding industry will find the reports of interest. Book reviews appear in many issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书