Pre-roling: an operational framework for facilitators and simulating participants (SPs) to prepare for both acting and educating safely.

IF 3.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Casper Danholt Iuul, Peter Dieckmann, Birgitte Bruun
{"title":"Pre-roling: an operational framework for facilitators and simulating participants (SPs) to prepare for both acting and educating safely.","authors":"Casper Danholt Iuul, Peter Dieckmann, Birgitte Bruun","doi":"10.1186/s41077-026-00419-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sometimes scenario-based simulations do not go as expected because facilitator and simulating participant (SP) are not sufficiently aligned. This innovation paper presents a pre-roling framework that offers an operational, theoretically informed tool for facilitators and SPs to prepare systematically for scenario-based simulations in health professions education. The framework development was based on four months of ethnographic fieldwork at the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) and informed by action theory.The pre-roling framework guides facilitators and SPs through five analytically distinct aspects of simulation performance — meaning (educational purpose), narrative (intended course of events), style (tone, tempo), character (the portrayed person), and health professions education (clinical picture, learning environment, task distribution, and care for the SP). Facilitators hold primary responsibility for meaning, narrative and style, while SPs hold primary responsibility for the character, with explicit collaboration across all domains.The framework and its accompanying pocket card and worksheet were iteratively refined in dialogue with SPs, course leaders and scenario designers. It is intended as a flexible, context-sensitive preparation tool that can be used symmetrically by SPs and facilitators, from novice to experienced, and in diverse simulation settings. It fills a previously unoccupied space between general guidelines and the moment of action by systematizing preparation without prescribing content, thereby supporting clearer alignment, more deliberate improvisation, and explicit attention to SP safety. Using the framework can reduce dissonance between SPs and facilitators, enhance the coherence of dramaturgical and educational intentions, improve learners’ experiential learning opportunities, and help prevent distress among SPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13040827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-026-00419-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sometimes scenario-based simulations do not go as expected because facilitator and simulating participant (SP) are not sufficiently aligned. This innovation paper presents a pre-roling framework that offers an operational, theoretically informed tool for facilitators and SPs to prepare systematically for scenario-based simulations in health professions education. The framework development was based on four months of ethnographic fieldwork at the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) and informed by action theory.The pre-roling framework guides facilitators and SPs through five analytically distinct aspects of simulation performance — meaning (educational purpose), narrative (intended course of events), style (tone, tempo), character (the portrayed person), and health professions education (clinical picture, learning environment, task distribution, and care for the SP). Facilitators hold primary responsibility for meaning, narrative and style, while SPs hold primary responsibility for the character, with explicit collaboration across all domains.The framework and its accompanying pocket card and worksheet were iteratively refined in dialogue with SPs, course leaders and scenario designers. It is intended as a flexible, context-sensitive preparation tool that can be used symmetrically by SPs and facilitators, from novice to experienced, and in diverse simulation settings. It fills a previously unoccupied space between general guidelines and the moment of action by systematizing preparation without prescribing content, thereby supporting clearer alignment, more deliberate improvisation, and explicit attention to SP safety. Using the framework can reduce dissonance between SPs and facilitators, enhance the coherence of dramaturgical and educational intentions, improve learners’ experiential learning opportunities, and help prevent distress among SPs.

预滚动:为辅导员和模拟参与者(SPs)提供一个操作框架,为安全行动和教育做好准备。
有时,基于场景的模拟不会像预期的那样进行,因为促进者和模拟参与者(SP)没有充分一致。这篇创新论文提出了一个预滚动框架,为辅导员和卫生专业人员提供了一个可操作的、理论上知情的工具,以便系统地为卫生专业教育中的基于场景的模拟做准备。该框架的制定基于在哥本哈根医学教育和模拟学院(CAMES)进行的四个月的人种学实地考察,并以行动理论为依据。预轮换框架通过模拟表演的五个分析不同方面来指导辅导员和SP -意义(教育目的),叙事(事件的预期过程),风格(语气,节奏),性格(描绘的人)和卫生专业教育(临床图片,学习环境,任务分配和对SP的照顾)。引导者对意义、叙述和风格负有主要责任,而SPs对角色负有主要责任,并在所有领域进行明确的合作。框架及其附带的口袋卡和工作表在与sp、课程领导者和场景设计师的对话中不断完善。它的目的是作为一个灵活的,上下文敏感的准备工具,可以对称地使用sp和促进者,从新手到有经验的,并在不同的模拟设置。它通过系统化的准备而不是规定内容,填补了一般指导方针和行动时刻之间的空白,从而支持更清晰的对齐,更深思熟虑的即兴创作,以及对SP安全的明确关注。使用该框架可以减少语言服务提供者和辅导员之间的不和谐,增强戏剧意图和教育意图的一致性,改善学习者的体验学习机会,并有助于防止语言服务提供者之间的困扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书