Evaluating [18F]-DCFPyL for Detecting Prostate Cancer Recurrence: A Cost-Consequence Comparison with Alternative PET Radiotracers in Spain.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2026-01-23 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.3390/jmahp14010007
Tiago Matos, Mrunmayee Godbole, Rithvik Badinedi, Madhusubramanian Muthukumar, Marina Hodolic, Nicolas Tchouen, Anthony Berthon
{"title":"Evaluating [<sup>18</sup>F]-DCFPyL for Detecting Prostate Cancer Recurrence: A Cost-Consequence Comparison with Alternative PET Radiotracers in Spain.","authors":"Tiago Matos, Mrunmayee Godbole, Rithvik Badinedi, Madhusubramanian Muthukumar, Marina Hodolic, Nicolas Tchouen, Anthony Berthon","doi":"10.3390/jmahp14010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> [<sup>18</sup>F]-DCFPyL (Piflufolastat [<sup>18</sup>F]) is a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted position emission tomography (PET) radiotracer for detecting the biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa). This study evaluates its economic impact compared with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-PSMA-11, [<sup>18</sup>F]-FCH, and [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA-1007 from the Spanish National Healthcare System's perspective. <b>Methods:</b> A cost-consequence model, over a 5-year time horizon, simulated the diagnostic and treatment pathway based on radiotracer-specific accuracy and disease localization. Treatment options included a radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and radiation therapy + ADT. Costs were calculated for true/false positives and negatives. Due to limited data availability, key inputs were informed by expert opinions, supported by published meta-analyses, public sources, and literature. Officially published Spanish prices were applied: EUR 2000 for [<sup>18</sup>F]-DCFPyL, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-PSMA-11, and [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA-1007, and EUR 1144 for [<sup>18</sup>F]-FCH. <b>Results:</b> The use of [<sup>18</sup>F]-DCFPyL led to fewer unnecessary therapies; specifically, it led to 11,229 (74%) fewer than [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-PSMA-11, and 5180 (56%) and 7771 (66%) fewer than [<sup>18</sup>F]-FCH and [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA-1007, respectively. It achieved significant cost savings for repeated testing: EUR 15M (43%) versus [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-PSMA-11, EUR 37M (65%) versus [<sup>18</sup>F]-FCH, and EUR 27M (58%) versus [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA-1007. Cost savings for false positives were EUR 15M (50%) against [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-PSMA-11, EUR 22M (60%) versus [<sup>18</sup>F]-FCH, and EUR 29M (66%) compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA-1007. The cost per correct diagnosis was reduced by EUR 198 (8%) compared with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-PSMA-11 and EUR 377 (15%) relative to [<sup>18</sup>F]-PSMA-1007, while showing a EUR 635 (40%) increase compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]-FCH. <b>Conclusions:</b> [<sup>18</sup>F]-DCFPyL offers a cost-saving option for BCR detection within the Spanish National Healthcare System by reducing the number of unnecessary therapies, the cost of false positives, and repeat testing compared with alternative radiotracers. These improvements support the potential for better diagnostic outcomes and more informed downstream clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"14 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12921982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmahp14010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: [18F]-DCFPyL (Piflufolastat [18F]) is a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted position emission tomography (PET) radiotracer for detecting the biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa). This study evaluates its economic impact compared with [68Ga]-PSMA-11, [18F]-FCH, and [18F]-PSMA-1007 from the Spanish National Healthcare System's perspective. Methods: A cost-consequence model, over a 5-year time horizon, simulated the diagnostic and treatment pathway based on radiotracer-specific accuracy and disease localization. Treatment options included a radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and radiation therapy + ADT. Costs were calculated for true/false positives and negatives. Due to limited data availability, key inputs were informed by expert opinions, supported by published meta-analyses, public sources, and literature. Officially published Spanish prices were applied: EUR 2000 for [18F]-DCFPyL, [68Ga]-PSMA-11, and [18F]-PSMA-1007, and EUR 1144 for [18F]-FCH. Results: The use of [18F]-DCFPyL led to fewer unnecessary therapies; specifically, it led to 11,229 (74%) fewer than [68Ga]-PSMA-11, and 5180 (56%) and 7771 (66%) fewer than [18F]-FCH and [18F]-PSMA-1007, respectively. It achieved significant cost savings for repeated testing: EUR 15M (43%) versus [68Ga]-PSMA-11, EUR 37M (65%) versus [18F]-FCH, and EUR 27M (58%) versus [18F]-PSMA-1007. Cost savings for false positives were EUR 15M (50%) against [68Ga]-PSMA-11, EUR 22M (60%) versus [18F]-FCH, and EUR 29M (66%) compared with [18F]-PSMA-1007. The cost per correct diagnosis was reduced by EUR 198 (8%) compared with [68Ga]-PSMA-11 and EUR 377 (15%) relative to [18F]-PSMA-1007, while showing a EUR 635 (40%) increase compared with [18F]-FCH. Conclusions: [18F]-DCFPyL offers a cost-saving option for BCR detection within the Spanish National Healthcare System by reducing the number of unnecessary therapies, the cost of false positives, and repeat testing compared with alternative radiotracers. These improvements support the potential for better diagnostic outcomes and more informed downstream clinical decision-making.

评估[18F]-DCFPyL检测前列腺癌复发:与其他PET示踪剂在西班牙的成本-后果比较。
简介:[18F]-DCFPyL (Piflufolastat [18F])是一种前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)靶向位置发射断层扫描(PET)放射示踪剂,用于检测前列腺癌(PCa)的生化复发(BCR)。本研究从西班牙国家医疗保健系统的角度比较了其与[68Ga]-PSMA-11、[18F]-FCH和[18F]-PSMA-1007的经济影响。方法:一个成本-后果模型,在5年的时间范围内,模拟基于放射性示踪剂特异性准确性和疾病定位的诊断和治疗途径。治疗方案包括根治性前列腺切除术、放射治疗、雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)和放射治疗+ ADT。计算了真/假阳性和阴性的成本。由于数据可用性有限,关键输入由专家意见提供,并得到已发表的荟萃分析、公共资源和文献的支持。采用官方公布的西班牙语价格:[18F]-DCFPyL、[68Ga]-PSMA-11和[18F]-PSMA-1007为2000欧元,[18F]-FCH为1144欧元。结果:使用[18F]-DCFPyL可减少不必要的治疗;具体来说,它比[68Ga]-PSMA-11少11229个(74%),比[18F]-FCH和[18F]-PSMA-1007分别少5180个(56%)和7771个(66%)。与[68Ga]-PSMA-11相比,它节省了1500万欧元(43%),与[18F]-FCH相比,3700万欧元(65%),与[18F]-PSMA-1007相比,2700万欧元(58%)。与[68Ga]-PSMA-11相比,假阳性的成本节约为1500万欧元(50%),与[18F]-FCH相比为2200万欧元(60%),与[18F]-PSMA-1007相比为2900万欧元(66%)。与[68Ga]-PSMA-11相比,每次正确诊断的成本降低了198欧元(8%),与[18F]-PSMA-1007相比,每次正确诊断的成本降低了377欧元(15%),而与[18F]-FCH相比,每次正确诊断的成本增加了635欧元(40%)。结论:[18F]-DCFPyL与其他放射性示踪剂相比,通过减少不必要的治疗次数、假阳性的成本和重复检测,为西班牙国家医疗保健系统内的BCR检测提供了一种节省成本的选择。这些改进支持了更好的诊断结果和更明智的下游临床决策的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书