Explainable Suicide Phenotyping from Initial Psychiatric Evaluation Notes Using Reasoning Large Language Models.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Zehan Li, Wanjing Wang, Lokesh Shahani, Rodrigo M Vieira, Salih Selek, Jair Soares, Hongfang Liu, Ming Huang
{"title":"Explainable Suicide Phenotyping from Initial Psychiatric Evaluation Notes Using Reasoning Large Language Models.","authors":"Zehan Li, Wanjing Wang, Lokesh Shahani, Rodrigo M Vieira, Salih Selek, Jair Soares, Hongfang Liu, Ming Huang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical phenotyping is the process of extracting patient's observable symptoms and traits to better understand their disease condition. Suicide phenotyping focuses more on behavioral and cognitive characteristics, such as suicide ideation, attempt, and self-injury, to identify suicide risks and improve interventions. In this study, we leveraged the latest reasoning models, namely 4o, o1, and o3-mini, to perform note-level multi-label classification and reasoning generation tasks using previously annotated psychiatric evaluation notes from a safety-net psychiatric inpatient hospital in Harris County, Texas. Compared with the previously finetuned GPT-3.5 model, the out-of-box reasoning models prompted with in-context learning achieved comparable and better performance, with the highest accuracy of 0.94 and F1 of 0.90. We implemented novel clinical justification generation from these models on the traditional classification tasks. This finding marked a promising direction for performing clinical phenotyping that is interpretable and actionable using smaller, efficient reasoning models.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":"2024 ","pages":"774-784"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12919457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical phenotyping is the process of extracting patient's observable symptoms and traits to better understand their disease condition. Suicide phenotyping focuses more on behavioral and cognitive characteristics, such as suicide ideation, attempt, and self-injury, to identify suicide risks and improve interventions. In this study, we leveraged the latest reasoning models, namely 4o, o1, and o3-mini, to perform note-level multi-label classification and reasoning generation tasks using previously annotated psychiatric evaluation notes from a safety-net psychiatric inpatient hospital in Harris County, Texas. Compared with the previously finetuned GPT-3.5 model, the out-of-box reasoning models prompted with in-context learning achieved comparable and better performance, with the highest accuracy of 0.94 and F1 of 0.90. We implemented novel clinical justification generation from these models on the traditional classification tasks. This finding marked a promising direction for performing clinical phenotyping that is interpretable and actionable using smaller, efficient reasoning models.

使用推理大语言模型从初始精神病评估笔记中解释自杀表型。
临床表型是提取患者可观察到的症状和特征,以更好地了解其疾病状况的过程。自杀表型更多地关注行为和认知特征,如自杀意念、企图和自残,以识别自杀风险并改进干预措施。在这项研究中,我们利用最新的推理模型,即40、01和03 -mini,使用来自德克萨斯州哈里斯县一家安全网精神病住院医院的先前注释的精神病评估笔记,执行笔记级别的多标签分类和推理生成任务。与之前经过微调的GPT-3.5模型相比,语境学习提示的箱外推理模型取得了相当好的性能,最高准确率为0.94,F1为0.90。我们利用这些模型在传统的分类任务上实现了新的临床证明生成。这一发现为使用更小、更有效的推理模型进行可解释和可操作的临床表型分析指明了一个有希望的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书