Navigating Variability in Prostate RT Planning: Real-Time Insights for Human-Centered CDS Design.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Meagan Foster, Elizabeth Byrd, Elizabeth Kwong, Anirudh Karunaker, Brian M Anderson, Michael C Repka, Ross McGurk, Shiva K Das, Lawrence B Marks, Lukasz Mazur
{"title":"Navigating Variability in Prostate RT Planning: Real-Time Insights for Human-Centered CDS Design.","authors":"Meagan Foster, Elizabeth Byrd, Elizabeth Kwong, Anirudh Karunaker, Brian M Anderson, Michael C Repka, Ross McGurk, Shiva K Das, Lawrence B Marks, Lukasz Mazur","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical variability in prostate radiation therapy (RT) planning is well documented, but little is known about how radiation oncologists experience and adapt to the factors that drive it. This study explores variability as a human-centered design challenge, with the goalofinformingclinicaldecision support (CDS) design through real-timeinsight into planning decisions. We conducted observation sessions with the think aloud method followed by semi-structured interviews with five radiation oncologists while they contoured prostate cases. Using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework, we thematically analyzed the contributors to variability across tasks, technology, and organizational conditions. Results suggest that variability arises not only from anatomical or guidelineambiguity, butalso fromindividual interpretations of inputs, variation in contouring decisions, andadaptive strategies such as reliance on prior experience and estimation under uncertainty. Findings support the design of context-sensitive CDS tools that reflect real-world clinical reasoning while preserving clinical flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":"2024 ","pages":"369-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12919530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical variability in prostate radiation therapy (RT) planning is well documented, but little is known about how radiation oncologists experience and adapt to the factors that drive it. This study explores variability as a human-centered design challenge, with the goalofinformingclinicaldecision support (CDS) design through real-timeinsight into planning decisions. We conducted observation sessions with the think aloud method followed by semi-structured interviews with five radiation oncologists while they contoured prostate cases. Using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework, we thematically analyzed the contributors to variability across tasks, technology, and organizational conditions. Results suggest that variability arises not only from anatomical or guidelineambiguity, butalso fromindividual interpretations of inputs, variation in contouring decisions, andadaptive strategies such as reliance on prior experience and estimation under uncertainty. Findings support the design of context-sensitive CDS tools that reflect real-world clinical reasoning while preserving clinical flexibility.

前列腺放射治疗计划中的导航变异性:以人为中心的CDS设计的实时洞察。
前列腺放射治疗(RT)计划的临床变异性有很好的文献记载,但很少有人知道放射肿瘤学家如何经历和适应驱动它的因素。本研究探讨了可变性作为一个以人为本的设计挑战,其目标是通过对规划决策的实时洞察,为临床决策支持(CDS)设计提供信息。我们用大声思考的方法进行了观察,然后与五位放射肿瘤学家进行了半结构化的访谈,同时他们勾勒了前列腺病例。使用患者安全系统工程计划(SEIPS)框架,我们从主题上分析了跨任务、技术和组织条件的可变性的贡献者。结果表明,变异不仅来自解剖或指导的模糊性,还来自对输入的个人解释,轮廓决策的变化,以及对先前经验的依赖和不确定性下的估计等适应策略。研究结果支持上下文敏感的CDS工具的设计,这些工具反映了现实世界的临床推理,同时保持了临床的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书