Seminal plasma cytokines in fertile versus infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 16.1 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hannah E Lyons, Cristina N Arriaran Scott, Sarah A Robertson, David J Sharkey
{"title":"Seminal plasma cytokines in fertile versus infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Hannah E Lyons, Cristina N Arriaran Scott, Sarah A Robertson, David J Sharkey","doi":"10.1093/humupd/dmag003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Male fertility investigation is currently limited to semen analysis. However, the origins of abnormal sperm parameters are not well-understood, and normal sperm do not assure fertility in men. Improved pathophysiological and prognostic insight might be achieved utilising additional measures of male reproductive tract function. Cytokine and chemokine levels in seminal plasma (SP) may be relevant, but evidence on their clinical significance is unclear. The utility of measuring SP cytokines remains uncertain, and no consensus exists on which cytokines are most informative.</p><p><strong>Objective and rationale: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between fertility status and concentration of seminal plasma cytokines in men. The sixth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen raises the prospect of evaluating cytokines in SP as part of an extended examination. We performed a systematic search and meta-analysis to assess whether the current literature is sufficient to identify cytokines present in human SP that exhibit a relationship with fertility status in men.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase from inception until April 2025, using keywords pertaining to seminal fluid and cytokines, restricted to humans and the English language. Original data with values reported as concentration of cytokines in SP of men clearly defined as infertile, compared to a discernible population of fertile/normozoospermic healthy control men, were included. A total of 5737 studies were identified, with 2737 duplicates removed. Title and abstract screening were performed for 3000 studies, then 291 studies underwent full-text screening, and 68 studies progressed to quality assessment using the NHLBI-NIH quality assessment tool and 52 studies underwent data extraction.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>We identified 52 research articles published from 1993 to 2025 that quantified at least one cytokine in the seminal plasma of 8153 men, after 19 studies of poor quality and/or containing serious flaws were excluded. Data on 30 cytokines in the SP of healthy control and infertile men were extracted and included in narrative synthesis. Compared to fertile controls, infertile men had elevated concentrations of IL6 (SMD 0.39, 95% CI; 0.14-0.64, I2 = 80.7%), TNFA (SMD 0.13, 95% CI; 0.00-0.25, I2 = 4.3%), and CXCL8 (SMD 0.24, 95% CI; 0.06-0.43, I2 = 0.0%) in seminal plasma. IL6 reported a high degree of heterogeneity between studies, whilst CXCL8 and TNFA reported low heterogeneity. No significant moderator effects due to study quality or composition of the control cohort were identified.</p><p><strong>Wider implications: </strong>With one in six couples experiencing infertility worldwide and a male factor identified as a primary or contributing cause in up to 50% of cases, there is a strong imperative to develop a better understanding of the pathophysiology of male infertility. This analysis identifies an association between infertility and elevated SP IL6, CXCL8, and TNFA, but whether these pro-inflammatory cytokines reflect events affecting fertility or are simply markers of transient inflammation and/or cofactors of fertility status remains to be determined. Greater precision in quantifying seminal plasma cytokines will be attained, and additional informative cytokines may be identified, by utilising standardised technical approaches in future studies.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>CRD42023398438.</p>","PeriodicalId":55045,"journal":{"name":"Human Reproduction Update","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Reproduction Update","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmag003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Male fertility investigation is currently limited to semen analysis. However, the origins of abnormal sperm parameters are not well-understood, and normal sperm do not assure fertility in men. Improved pathophysiological and prognostic insight might be achieved utilising additional measures of male reproductive tract function. Cytokine and chemokine levels in seminal plasma (SP) may be relevant, but evidence on their clinical significance is unclear. The utility of measuring SP cytokines remains uncertain, and no consensus exists on which cytokines are most informative.

Objective and rationale: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between fertility status and concentration of seminal plasma cytokines in men. The sixth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen raises the prospect of evaluating cytokines in SP as part of an extended examination. We performed a systematic search and meta-analysis to assess whether the current literature is sufficient to identify cytokines present in human SP that exhibit a relationship with fertility status in men.

Search methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase from inception until April 2025, using keywords pertaining to seminal fluid and cytokines, restricted to humans and the English language. Original data with values reported as concentration of cytokines in SP of men clearly defined as infertile, compared to a discernible population of fertile/normozoospermic healthy control men, were included. A total of 5737 studies were identified, with 2737 duplicates removed. Title and abstract screening were performed for 3000 studies, then 291 studies underwent full-text screening, and 68 studies progressed to quality assessment using the NHLBI-NIH quality assessment tool and 52 studies underwent data extraction.

Outcomes: We identified 52 research articles published from 1993 to 2025 that quantified at least one cytokine in the seminal plasma of 8153 men, after 19 studies of poor quality and/or containing serious flaws were excluded. Data on 30 cytokines in the SP of healthy control and infertile men were extracted and included in narrative synthesis. Compared to fertile controls, infertile men had elevated concentrations of IL6 (SMD 0.39, 95% CI; 0.14-0.64, I2 = 80.7%), TNFA (SMD 0.13, 95% CI; 0.00-0.25, I2 = 4.3%), and CXCL8 (SMD 0.24, 95% CI; 0.06-0.43, I2 = 0.0%) in seminal plasma. IL6 reported a high degree of heterogeneity between studies, whilst CXCL8 and TNFA reported low heterogeneity. No significant moderator effects due to study quality or composition of the control cohort were identified.

Wider implications: With one in six couples experiencing infertility worldwide and a male factor identified as a primary or contributing cause in up to 50% of cases, there is a strong imperative to develop a better understanding of the pathophysiology of male infertility. This analysis identifies an association between infertility and elevated SP IL6, CXCL8, and TNFA, but whether these pro-inflammatory cytokines reflect events affecting fertility or are simply markers of transient inflammation and/or cofactors of fertility status remains to be determined. Greater precision in quantifying seminal plasma cytokines will be attained, and additional informative cytokines may be identified, by utilising standardised technical approaches in future studies.

Registration number: CRD42023398438.

可育男性与不育男性的精浆细胞因子:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:目前对男性生育能力的研究仅限于精液分析。然而,异常精子参数的起源尚不清楚,正常精子并不能保证男性的生育能力。利用男性生殖道功能的额外测量可以改善病理生理和预后。精浆(SP)中的细胞因子和趋化因子水平可能相关,但其临床意义的证据尚不清楚。测量SP细胞因子的效用仍然不确定,对于哪种细胞因子最具信息量也没有共识。目的和理由:对男性生育状况与精浆细胞因子浓度之间的关系进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。世卫组织人类精液检查和处理实验室手册第六版提出了评估SP中的细胞因子作为扩展检查的一部分的前景。我们进行了系统的搜索和荟萃分析,以评估目前的文献是否足以确定人类SP中存在的细胞因子与男性生育状况的关系。检索方法:我们检索了PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和Embase,检索时间从成立之初到2025年4月,检索关键词与精液和细胞因子相关,仅限于人类和英语。与可识别的可生育/正常精子健康对照男性相比,纳入了具有明确定义为不育男性SP中细胞因子浓度报告值的原始数据。共鉴定了5737项研究,删除了2737项重复。对3000项研究进行标题和摘要筛选,291项研究进行全文筛选,68项研究使用NHLBI-NIH质量评估工具进行质量评估,52项研究进行数据提取。结果:在排除了19项质量差和/或含有严重缺陷的研究后,我们确定了1993年至2025年发表的52篇研究文章,这些文章量化了8153名男性精浆中至少一种细胞因子。提取健康对照和不育男性SP中30种细胞因子的数据,纳入叙事综合。与有生育能力的对照组相比,不育男性的精浆中il - 6 (SMD 0.39, 95% CI; 0.14-0.64, I2 = 80.7%)、TNFA (SMD 0.13, 95% CI; 0.00-0.25, I2 = 4.3%)和CXCL8 (SMD 0.24, 95% CI; 0.06-0.43, I2 = 0.0%)浓度升高。IL6在研究间的异质性较高,而CXCL8和TNFA的异质性较低。由于研究质量或对照队列的组成,没有发现显著的调节效应。更广泛的影响:全世界有六分之一的夫妇患有不育症,男性因素被确定为高达50%的病例的主要或促成原因,因此有必要更好地了解男性不育症的病理生理学。该分析确定了不育与SP IL6、CXCL8和TNFA升高之间的关联,但这些促炎细胞因子是否反映了影响生育的事件,还是仅仅是短暂炎症和/或生育状态的辅助因素的标志,仍有待确定。在未来的研究中,通过使用标准化的技术方法,精浆细胞因子的定量将获得更高的精度,并且可以识别更多的信息细胞因子。注册号:CRD42023398438。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Reproduction Update
Human Reproduction Update 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
28.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction Update is the leading journal in its field, boasting a Journal Impact FactorTM of 13.3 and ranked first in Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (Source: Journal Citation ReportsTM from Clarivate, 2023). It specializes in publishing comprehensive and systematic review articles covering various aspects of human reproductive physiology and medicine. The journal prioritizes basic, transitional, and clinical topics related to reproduction, encompassing areas such as andrology, embryology, infertility, gynaecology, pregnancy, reproductive endocrinology, reproductive epidemiology, reproductive genetics, reproductive immunology, and reproductive oncology. Human Reproduction Update is published on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), maintaining the highest scientific and editorial standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书