Are You MAD (Mammographic Architectural Distortion)? Introducing Subtypes of Synthetic Mammography/Tomosynthesis-Detected Architectural Distortion: Radiating Distortion and Nonradiating Tissue Alteration.

IF 1.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Steven P Poplack, Meng Hao, Tie Liang, Brittany Z Dashevsky
{"title":"Are You MAD (Mammographic Architectural Distortion)? Introducing Subtypes of Synthetic Mammography/Tomosynthesis-Detected Architectural Distortion: Radiating Distortion and Nonradiating Tissue Alteration.","authors":"Steven P Poplack, Meng Hao, Tie Liang, Brittany Z Dashevsky","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goals of this study are to introduce subtypes of mammographic architectural distortion (MAD), designated as radiating distortion (RD) and nonradiating tissue alteration (TA), and evaluate the clinical outcomes, interobserver agreement, and predictive capability of these newly defined subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Radiating distortion, TA, and 7 mammographic features of MAD were prospectively defined. Three breast radiologists reviewed consecutive screening synthetic mammography/tomosynthesis examinations recalled for MAD between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. Reviewers reclassified MAD as RD, TA, or Neither (RD nor TA) and rated mammographic features. Majority classification was used for analyses. Clinical outcomes were established with ≥2 year follow-up and compared using Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression was performed for feature prediction of MAD subtypes and malignancy. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-nine eligible cases were majority classified as RD in 22.5% (20/89), TA in 48.3% (43/89), and Neither in 29.2% (26/89). Malignancy was found in 45% (9/20) of RD, 11.6% (5/43) of TA, and 0% (0/26) of Neither. There were significant differences in diagnostic imaging findings, assessment, and recommendation between subtypes. In all, 80.8% (21/26) of Neither designations represented superimposition. There was substantial interobserver agreement for MAD subtype, Gwet's AC = 0.65. The following features were significantly predictive of RD: ≥7 dense lines, straight-line type, and point convergence. Radiating distortion was predictive of malignancy, and nondense center was associated with benignity in this limited sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Synthetic mammography/tomosynthesis screen-detected MAD classified as RD and TA demonstrated substantial interobserver agreement and significantly different clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"406-418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The goals of this study are to introduce subtypes of mammographic architectural distortion (MAD), designated as radiating distortion (RD) and nonradiating tissue alteration (TA), and evaluate the clinical outcomes, interobserver agreement, and predictive capability of these newly defined subtypes.

Methods: Radiating distortion, TA, and 7 mammographic features of MAD were prospectively defined. Three breast radiologists reviewed consecutive screening synthetic mammography/tomosynthesis examinations recalled for MAD between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. Reviewers reclassified MAD as RD, TA, or Neither (RD nor TA) and rated mammographic features. Majority classification was used for analyses. Clinical outcomes were established with ≥2 year follow-up and compared using Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression was performed for feature prediction of MAD subtypes and malignancy. Interobserver agreement was assessed using Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC).

Results: Eighty-nine eligible cases were majority classified as RD in 22.5% (20/89), TA in 48.3% (43/89), and Neither in 29.2% (26/89). Malignancy was found in 45% (9/20) of RD, 11.6% (5/43) of TA, and 0% (0/26) of Neither. There were significant differences in diagnostic imaging findings, assessment, and recommendation between subtypes. In all, 80.8% (21/26) of Neither designations represented superimposition. There was substantial interobserver agreement for MAD subtype, Gwet's AC = 0.65. The following features were significantly predictive of RD: ≥7 dense lines, straight-line type, and point convergence. Radiating distortion was predictive of malignancy, and nondense center was associated with benignity in this limited sample.

Conclusion: Synthetic mammography/tomosynthesis screen-detected MAD classified as RD and TA demonstrated substantial interobserver agreement and significantly different clinical outcomes.

你是MAD(乳房x线摄影结构扭曲)吗?介绍合成乳房x线摄影/断层合成检测到的结构畸变亚型:辐射畸变和非辐射组织改变。
目的:本研究的目的是介绍乳房x线摄影结构畸变(MAD)的亚型,指定为放射性畸变(RD)和非放射性组织改变(TA),并评估这些新定义亚型的临床结果、观察者间一致性和预测能力。方法:前瞻性地确定MAD的放射畸变、TA和7个乳房x线影像学特征。三名乳腺放射科医生回顾了2021年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间因MAD召回的连续筛查合成乳房x线摄影/断层合成检查。审稿人将MAD重新分类为RD、TA或两者均无(RD或TA),并对乳房x线摄影特征进行评分。采用多数分类进行分析。通过≥2年的随访确定临床结果,并使用Fisher精确检验进行比较。采用Logistic回归预测MAD亚型和恶性程度的特征。使用Gwet协议系数(AC)评估观察者间的一致性。结果:89例符合条件的患者中,有22.5%(20/89)为RD, 48.3%(43/89)为TA, 29.2%(26/89)为非RD。恶性肿瘤在RD中占45% (9/20),TA中占11.6%(5/43),两者均为0%(0/26)。不同亚型之间的诊断影像学表现、评估和推荐有显著差异。两种命名均有80.8%(21/26)存在重叠。观察者间对于MAD亚型的一致度很高,Gwet的AC = 0.65。以下特征可显著预测RD:≥7条密集线、直线型、点收敛。在这个有限的样本中,辐射扭曲是恶性肿瘤的预测,而非致密中心与良性肿瘤相关。结论:合成乳房x线摄影/断层合成筛查检测到的分类为RD和TA的MAD显示了大量的观察者之间的一致性和显著不同的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
81
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书