Piermarco Consiglio, Marjon Fokkens-Bruinsma, Marie-Christine Opdenakker, Ellen P W A Jansen, Joke Fleer
{"title":"Dual Pathways From Self-Compassion and Self-Criticism to Academic Achievement: The Roles of Engagement and Exhaustion.","authors":"Piermarco Consiglio, Marjon Fokkens-Bruinsma, Marie-Christine Opdenakker, Ellen P W A Jansen, Joke Fleer","doi":"10.5334/pme.1821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Engagement and burnout symptoms among medical students are key factors influencing their academic performance, risk of dropout, and overall well-being. While research has primarily focused on negative constructs such as burnout symptoms, less attention has been given to how positive constructs, such as engagement, evolve over time. This study examines the temporal changes in medical students' engagement and exhaustion while exploring two distinct pathways: the 'bright path', which investigates engagement as a mediator between self-compassion and academic achievement, and the 'dark path', which examines exhaustion as a mediator between self-criticism and academic achievement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Self-report measures were used to assess self-compassion, self-criticism, engagement, and exhaustion, while academic achievement was measured objectively. The data were drawn from a longitudinal research project that followed 117 medical students throughout their entire Bachelor's program. Analyses included linear growth models and parallel process latent growth curve models to examine changes over time and potential mediation effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings show a decline in engagement and exhaustion throughout the Bachelor's program. Furthermore, neither engagement nor exhaustion mediated the relationships within the bright and dark pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings underscore the importance of fostering environments that promote well-being and engagement while addressing negative factors like exhaustion that can hinder student success. They also highlight the potential influence of contextual factors in shaping medical students' experiences, suggesting that interactions between personal resources and environmental demands may play a key role in shaping students' engagement, exhaustion and academic achievement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48532,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Medical Education","volume":"15 1","pages":"162-176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12922675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1821","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Engagement and burnout symptoms among medical students are key factors influencing their academic performance, risk of dropout, and overall well-being. While research has primarily focused on negative constructs such as burnout symptoms, less attention has been given to how positive constructs, such as engagement, evolve over time. This study examines the temporal changes in medical students' engagement and exhaustion while exploring two distinct pathways: the 'bright path', which investigates engagement as a mediator between self-compassion and academic achievement, and the 'dark path', which examines exhaustion as a mediator between self-criticism and academic achievement.
Methods: Self-report measures were used to assess self-compassion, self-criticism, engagement, and exhaustion, while academic achievement was measured objectively. The data were drawn from a longitudinal research project that followed 117 medical students throughout their entire Bachelor's program. Analyses included linear growth models and parallel process latent growth curve models to examine changes over time and potential mediation effects.
Results: The findings show a decline in engagement and exhaustion throughout the Bachelor's program. Furthermore, neither engagement nor exhaustion mediated the relationships within the bright and dark pathways.
Conclusions: Findings underscore the importance of fostering environments that promote well-being and engagement while addressing negative factors like exhaustion that can hinder student success. They also highlight the potential influence of contextual factors in shaping medical students' experiences, suggesting that interactions between personal resources and environmental demands may play a key role in shaping students' engagement, exhaustion and academic achievement.
期刊介绍：
Perspectives on Medical Education mission is support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices.
Official journal of the The Netherlands Association of Medical Education (NVMO).
Perspectives on Medical Education is a non-profit Open Access journal with no charges for authors to submit or publish an article, and the full text of all articles is freely available immediately upon publication, thanks to the sponsorship of The Netherlands Association for Medical Education.
Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy.
Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary.
The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members.
The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief.
Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary.
The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members.
The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief.
Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
