An oBservational retrospective Analysis of treatment patternS and Effectiveness of standard of CAre for Multiple Myeloma Patients Exposed to Lenalidomide and a Proteasome Inhibitor: BasecaMMp Study

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2026.01.013
Klaus Martin Kortüm , James Farrell , Olivia Ashman , Guido Nador , Paul Cislo , Jaime Luna , Moritz Lehne , Keltie O’Neill , Markus Rückert , Kai Strobel , Sebastian Theurich
{"title":"An oBservational retrospective Analysis of treatment patternS and Effectiveness of standard of CAre for Multiple Myeloma Patients Exposed to Lenalidomide and a Proteasome Inhibitor: BasecaMMp Study","authors":"Klaus Martin Kortüm ,&nbsp;James Farrell ,&nbsp;Olivia Ashman ,&nbsp;Guido Nador ,&nbsp;Paul Cislo ,&nbsp;Jaime Luna ,&nbsp;Moritz Lehne ,&nbsp;Keltie O’Neill ,&nbsp;Markus Rückert ,&nbsp;Kai Strobel ,&nbsp;Sebastian Theurich","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2026.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Most patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have previously received lenalidomide (LEN) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs). This real-world study describes treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for RRMM patients post-LEN and PI in Germany.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The BasecaMMp cohort included patients with prior LEN and PI therapy within the first to third line of treatment (LOT) between May 2016 and December 2023. Patient characteristics, treatment regimens and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1834 patients included (median age: 72.5 years; 59.5% male; median of 2 prior LOTs), around 30.4% were double-refractory, and 47.7% were LEN-refractory. Index therapies (first therapies received after exposure to LEN and a PI in the first to third lines) were highly heterogeneous. Median PFS was 12.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.2-13.14) months overall and 11.3 (95% CI, 10.3-12.1) months in LEN-refractory patients, while median OS was 37.1 (95% CI, 34.2-40.7) months overall and 34.3 (95% CI, 31.1-41.0) months in LEN-refractory patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings highlight the lack of a clear standard of care, poor clinical outcomes, and the need for more effective therapies and treatment strategies for this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":"26 5","pages":"Pages e603-e610.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2152265026000285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Most patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have previously received lenalidomide (LEN) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs). This real-world study describes treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for RRMM patients post-LEN and PI in Germany.

Methods

The BasecaMMp cohort included patients with prior LEN and PI therapy within the first to third line of treatment (LOT) between May 2016 and December 2023. Patient characteristics, treatment regimens and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were analyzed.

Results

Of 1834 patients included (median age: 72.5 years; 59.5% male; median of 2 prior LOTs), around 30.4% were double-refractory, and 47.7% were LEN-refractory. Index therapies (first therapies received after exposure to LEN and a PI in the first to third lines) were highly heterogeneous. Median PFS was 12.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.2-13.14) months overall and 11.3 (95% CI, 10.3-12.1) months in LEN-refractory patients, while median OS was 37.1 (95% CI, 34.2-40.7) months overall and 34.3 (95% CI, 31.1-41.0) months in LEN-refractory patients.

Conclusion

These findings highlight the lack of a clear standard of care, poor clinical outcomes, and the need for more effective therapies and treatment strategies for this population.
来那度胺和蛋白酶体抑制剂暴露的多发性骨髓瘤患者的标准护理治疗模式和有效性的观察性回顾性分析:BasecaMMp研究。
大多数复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者先前接受过来那度胺(LEN)和蛋白酶体抑制剂(pi)。这一真实世界的研究描述了德国的RRMM患者在len和PI后的治疗模式和临床结果。方法:BasecaMMp队列包括2016年5月至2023年12月期间在一线至三线治疗(LOT)中接受LEN和PI治疗的患者。分析患者特征、治疗方案、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和下一次治疗时间(TTNT)。结果:在纳入的1834例患者中(中位年龄:72.5岁;59.5%为男性;前2批次中位),约30.4%为双难治性,47.7%为len难治性。指数疗法(暴露于LEN和第一至第三行PI后接受的首次疗法)是高度异质性的。len难治性患者的中位PFS为12.7(95%可信区间[CI], 12.2-13.14)个月,len难治性患者的中位PFS为11.3 (95% CI, 10.3-12.1)个月,而len难治性患者的中位OS为37.1 (95% CI, 34.2-40.7)个月和34.3 (95% CI, 31.1-41.0)个月。结论:这些发现强调缺乏明确的护理标准,临床结果不佳,需要更有效的治疗方法和治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书