Debt as a US defence spending consideration since the end of World War II. Part Two: Nixon to Biden

IF 1.8 Q3 ECONOMICS
David Tier
{"title":"Debt as a US defence spending consideration since the end of World War II. Part Two: Nixon to Biden","authors":"David Tier","doi":"10.1111/ecaf.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>American presidents since 1945 have deliberately considered reducing defence spending as part of a plan to shrink deficits, but they have also found there is a level of defence spending they dare not fall beneath. Using qualitative analysis, I examine the rhetoric these leaders have articulated to consider the trade-offs between the economic costs of deficit spending and the military budgets necessary to defend the nation against military threats. Part One of this study (published in <i>Economic Affairs</i>, vol. 45, no. 3) examined rhetoric through the Lyndon B. Johnson administration. Part Two examines rhetoric from the Nixon through Biden administrations, analyses the total results and, finally, sets out the contribution of this research. These results inform debates over the US national debt, deficit spending, and the mixture of spending cuts and revenue increases needed to achieve a balanced budget.</p>","PeriodicalId":44825,"journal":{"name":"ECONOMIC AFFAIRS","volume":"46 1","pages":"17-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECONOMIC AFFAIRS","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecaf.70016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

American presidents since 1945 have deliberately considered reducing defence spending as part of a plan to shrink deficits, but they have also found there is a level of defence spending they dare not fall beneath. Using qualitative analysis, I examine the rhetoric these leaders have articulated to consider the trade-offs between the economic costs of deficit spending and the military budgets necessary to defend the nation against military threats. Part One of this study (published in Economic Affairs, vol. 45, no. 3) examined rhetoric through the Lyndon B. Johnson administration. Part Two examines rhetoric from the Nixon through Biden administrations, analyses the total results and, finally, sets out the contribution of this research. These results inform debates over the US national debt, deficit spending, and the mixture of spending cuts and revenue increases needed to achieve a balanced budget.

自二战结束以来,债务作为美国国防开支的考虑。第二部分:尼克松对拜登
自1945年以来,美国历任总统都有意将削减国防开支作为削减赤字计划的一部分,但他们也发现,有一个他们不敢低于的国防开支水平。通过定性分析,我研究了这些领导人在考虑赤字开支的经济成本和保卫国家免受军事威胁所必需的军事预算之间的权衡时所表达的言论。本研究的第一部分(发表于《经济事务》第45卷第1期)。3)通过林登·约翰逊(Lyndon B. Johnson)政府研究修辞。第二部分考察了从尼克松到拜登政府的修辞,分析了总体结果,最后阐述了本研究的贡献。这些结果为有关美国国债、赤字支出以及实现预算平衡所需的减支增收组合的辩论提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ECONOMIC AFFAIRS
ECONOMIC AFFAIRS ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Economic Affairs is a journal for those interested in the application of economic principles to practical affairs. It aims to stimulate debate on economic and social problems by asking its authors, while analysing complex issues, to make their analysis and conclusions accessible to a wide audience. Each issue has a theme on which the main articles focus, providing a succinct and up-to-date review of a particular field of applied economics. Themes in 2008 included: New Perspectives on the Economics and Politics of Ageing, Housing for the Poor: the Role of Government, The Economic Analysis of Institutions, and Healthcare: State Failure. Academics are also invited to submit additional articles on subjects related to the coverage of the journal. There is section of double blind refereed articles and a section for shorter pieces that are reviewed by our Editorial Board (Economic Viewpoints). Please contact the editor for full submission details for both sections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书