{"title":"Debt as a US defence spending consideration since the end of World War II. Part Two: Nixon to Biden","authors":"David Tier","doi":"10.1111/ecaf.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>American presidents since 1945 have deliberately considered reducing defence spending as part of a plan to shrink deficits, but they have also found there is a level of defence spending they dare not fall beneath. Using qualitative analysis, I examine the rhetoric these leaders have articulated to consider the trade-offs between the economic costs of deficit spending and the military budgets necessary to defend the nation against military threats. Part One of this study (published in <i>Economic Affairs</i>, vol. 45, no. 3) examined rhetoric through the Lyndon B. Johnson administration. Part Two examines rhetoric from the Nixon through Biden administrations, analyses the total results and, finally, sets out the contribution of this research. These results inform debates over the US national debt, deficit spending, and the mixture of spending cuts and revenue increases needed to achieve a balanced budget.</p>","PeriodicalId":44825,"journal":{"name":"ECONOMIC AFFAIRS","volume":"46 1","pages":"17-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECONOMIC AFFAIRS","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecaf.70016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
American presidents since 1945 have deliberately considered reducing defence spending as part of a plan to shrink deficits, but they have also found there is a level of defence spending they dare not fall beneath. Using qualitative analysis, I examine the rhetoric these leaders have articulated to consider the trade-offs between the economic costs of deficit spending and the military budgets necessary to defend the nation against military threats. Part One of this study (published in Economic Affairs, vol. 45, no. 3) examined rhetoric through the Lyndon B. Johnson administration. Part Two examines rhetoric from the Nixon through Biden administrations, analyses the total results and, finally, sets out the contribution of this research. These results inform debates over the US national debt, deficit spending, and the mixture of spending cuts and revenue increases needed to achieve a balanced budget.
自1945年以来,美国历任总统都有意将削减国防开支作为削减赤字计划的一部分,但他们也发现,有一个他们不敢低于的国防开支水平。通过定性分析,我研究了这些领导人在考虑赤字开支的经济成本和保卫国家免受军事威胁所必需的军事预算之间的权衡时所表达的言论。本研究的第一部分(发表于《经济事务》第45卷第1期)。3)通过林登·约翰逊(Lyndon B. Johnson)政府研究修辞。第二部分考察了从尼克松到拜登政府的修辞,分析了总体结果,最后阐述了本研究的贡献。这些结果为有关美国国债、赤字支出以及实现预算平衡所需的减支增收组合的辩论提供了依据。
期刊介绍:
Economic Affairs is a journal for those interested in the application of economic principles to practical affairs. It aims to stimulate debate on economic and social problems by asking its authors, while analysing complex issues, to make their analysis and conclusions accessible to a wide audience. Each issue has a theme on which the main articles focus, providing a succinct and up-to-date review of a particular field of applied economics. Themes in 2008 included: New Perspectives on the Economics and Politics of Ageing, Housing for the Poor: the Role of Government, The Economic Analysis of Institutions, and Healthcare: State Failure. Academics are also invited to submit additional articles on subjects related to the coverage of the journal. There is section of double blind refereed articles and a section for shorter pieces that are reviewed by our Editorial Board (Economic Viewpoints). Please contact the editor for full submission details for both sections.