Developing a Trauma Checklist for People With a Learning Disability Accessing Community Health and Support Services

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Sarah Wigham, Arman Iranpour, John L. Taylor, Claire Hills-Wilson, Pamela Reitemeier, Katharine Petersen, Iain McKinnon, Simon S. Hackett
{"title":"Developing a Trauma Checklist for People With a Learning Disability Accessing Community Health and Support Services","authors":"Sarah Wigham,&nbsp;Arman Iranpour,&nbsp;John L. Taylor,&nbsp;Claire Hills-Wilson,&nbsp;Pamela Reitemeier,&nbsp;Katharine Petersen,&nbsp;Iain McKinnon,&nbsp;Simon S. Hackett","doi":"10.1111/bld.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Research suggests people with a learning disability experience high prevalence of adverse life events which may result in trauma-related mental health conditions. Identifying trauma-related mental health conditions can facilitate access to support, however research suggests they may be under-identified in this group. The aim of this study was to develop trauma checklists appropriate for people with a learning disability accessing community health and support services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The checklist was developed iteratively during consultation and informed by the Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scales. Data were collected during interviews and focus groups and analysed using thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-eight participants included seven people with a learning disability, two relatives and 19 service providers. Two trauma checklists, each with 13 questions were developed including an accessible self-report and an informant or observer version. Content validity, face validity, utility and acceptability were supported. Three themes were identified including: (i) recognising trauma responses and early identification, (ii) continuity of care and care pathways and (iii) characteristics of the checklists.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The checklists can be used to raise awareness of trauma and support development of trauma care pathways for people with a learning disability accessing community health and support services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47232,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"54 1","pages":"74-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bld.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.70018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Research suggests people with a learning disability experience high prevalence of adverse life events which may result in trauma-related mental health conditions. Identifying trauma-related mental health conditions can facilitate access to support, however research suggests they may be under-identified in this group. The aim of this study was to develop trauma checklists appropriate for people with a learning disability accessing community health and support services.

Methods

The checklist was developed iteratively during consultation and informed by the Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scales. Data were collected during interviews and focus groups and analysed using thematic analysis.

Findings

Twenty-eight participants included seven people with a learning disability, two relatives and 19 service providers. Two trauma checklists, each with 13 questions were developed including an accessible self-report and an informant or observer version. Content validity, face validity, utility and acceptability were supported. Three themes were identified including: (i) recognising trauma responses and early identification, (ii) continuity of care and care pathways and (iii) characteristics of the checklists.

Conclusions

The checklists can be used to raise awareness of trauma and support development of trauma care pathways for people with a learning disability accessing community health and support services.

Abstract Image

为有学习障碍的人提供社区健康和支持服务制定创伤检查表
研究表明,有学习障碍的人经历的不良生活事件的患病率很高,这可能导致与创伤相关的心理健康状况。确定与创伤相关的心理健康状况可以促进获得支持,然而研究表明,他们可能在这一群体中被低估了。本研究的目的是制定适合学习障碍患者获得社区健康和支持服务的创伤检查表。方法以兰开斯特和诺斯盖特创伤量表为参考,在会诊过程中反复编制核对表。数据是在访谈和焦点小组中收集的,并使用专题分析进行分析。28名参与者包括7名学习障碍患者、2名亲属和19名服务提供者。两个创伤检查表,每个有13个问题,包括一个可访问的自我报告和一个线人或观察者版本。支持内容效度、表面效度、效用和可接受性。确定了三个主题,包括:(i)识别创伤反应和早期识别,(ii)护理和护理途径的连续性以及(iii)检查清单的特征。结论该量表可提高学习障碍者的创伤意识,支持创伤护理路径的发展,帮助学习障碍者获得社区卫生和支持服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Learning Disabilities is an interdisciplinary international peer-reviewed journal which aims to be the leading journal in the learning disability field. It is the official Journal of the British Institute of Learning Disabilities. It encompasses contemporary debate/s and developments in research, policy and practice that are relevant to the field of learning disabilities. It publishes original refereed papers, regular special issues giving comprehensive coverage to specific subject areas, and especially commissioned keynote reviews on major topics. In addition, there are reviews of books and training materials, and a letters section. The focus of the journal is on practical issues, with current debates and research reports. Topics covered could include, but not be limited to: Current trends in residential and day-care service Inclusion, rehabilitation and quality of life Education and training Historical and inclusive pieces [particularly welcomed are those co-written with people with learning disabilities] Therapies Mental health issues Employment and occupation Recreation and leisure; Ethical issues, advocacy and rights Family and carers Health issues Adoption and fostering Causation and management of specific syndromes Staff training New technology Policy critique and impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书