Axis selection in transverse magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: Electronic angulation techniques

Roger A. Hyman , Jon H. Edwards , Orlando Alvarez , Jonathan Wiener , Harry L. Stein
{"title":"Axis selection in transverse magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: Electronic angulation techniques","authors":"Roger A. Hyman ,&nbsp;Jon H. Edwards ,&nbsp;Orlando Alvarez ,&nbsp;Jonathan Wiener ,&nbsp;Harry L. Stein","doi":"10.1016/0730-4862(87)90022-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The cylindrical design of most head coils utilized with current magnetic resonance (MR) imaging units and the necessity of close approximation of the coil to the head to maximize signal-to-noise ratio precludes flexion or extension of the head to any significant degree during imaging of the brain. For this reason, the canthomeatal line is approximately parallel to the standard transverse magnetic axis. Standard computed tomography (CT) scans in the transverse plane are usually obtained at an approximately 25° angle to Reid's baseline (RBL). This leads to projection differences in viewing and comparing standard transverse MR and CT studies. High convexity lesions which may present anteriorly on a given CT section may present posteriorly on an MR section which appears to be at a comparable level on first inspection. Secondly, one or more transverse MR sections usually display a portion of the occipital lobes behind the cerebellar hemispheres. The region of the tentorium and straight sinus can occasionally give rise to a vermiform appearance (the “AVM artifact”). Thirty patients were studied with MR at a 20–30° angulation to RBL without any loss of image quality and with excellent visualization of the posterior fossa. The effect of transverse axis change on lesion position was demonstrated in five high convexity lesions and by utilizing fixed brain specimens. While clearly MR can accurately localize lesions utilizing orthogonal multiplanar techniques, it is suggested that investigators and clinicians currently performing MR studies of the brain consider potential advantages of electronic angulation techniques for comparative clinical studies and certain research applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77839,"journal":{"name":"Computerized radiology : official journal of the Computerized Tomography Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0730-4862(87)90022-9","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computerized radiology : official journal of the Computerized Tomography Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0730486287900229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The cylindrical design of most head coils utilized with current magnetic resonance (MR) imaging units and the necessity of close approximation of the coil to the head to maximize signal-to-noise ratio precludes flexion or extension of the head to any significant degree during imaging of the brain. For this reason, the canthomeatal line is approximately parallel to the standard transverse magnetic axis. Standard computed tomography (CT) scans in the transverse plane are usually obtained at an approximately 25° angle to Reid's baseline (RBL). This leads to projection differences in viewing and comparing standard transverse MR and CT studies. High convexity lesions which may present anteriorly on a given CT section may present posteriorly on an MR section which appears to be at a comparable level on first inspection. Secondly, one or more transverse MR sections usually display a portion of the occipital lobes behind the cerebellar hemispheres. The region of the tentorium and straight sinus can occasionally give rise to a vermiform appearance (the “AVM artifact”). Thirty patients were studied with MR at a 20–30° angulation to RBL without any loss of image quality and with excellent visualization of the posterior fossa. The effect of transverse axis change on lesion position was demonstrated in five high convexity lesions and by utilizing fixed brain specimens. While clearly MR can accurately localize lesions utilizing orthogonal multiplanar techniques, it is suggested that investigators and clinicians currently performing MR studies of the brain consider potential advantages of electronic angulation techniques for comparative clinical studies and certain research applications.

脑横向磁共振成像的轴选择:电子角度技术
目前磁共振成像装置使用的大多数头部线圈的圆柱形设计,以及线圈与头部接近以最大化信噪比的必要性,排除了在大脑成像过程中头部的任何显著程度的弯曲或伸展。因此,角鼻线近似平行于标准横向磁轴。标准的计算机断层扫描(CT)通常在与里德基线(RBL)约25°角的横向平面上进行扫描。这导致在观察和比较标准横向MR和CT研究时的投影差异。在给定的CT切片上可能出现在前面的高凸性病变可能在MR切片上出现在后面,这在第一次检查时似乎处于相当的水平。其次,一个或多个横向MR切片通常显示小脑半球后面的部分枕叶。幕状和直窦区域偶尔会出现蚓状外观(“AVM伪影”)。30例患者在与RBL成20-30°角的情况下进行MR研究,图像质量没有任何损失,后窝的视觉效果很好。横轴变化对病变位置的影响在5个高凸性病变和利用固定脑标本。虽然磁共振可以利用正交多平面技术准确定位病变,但建议目前进行大脑磁共振研究的研究人员和临床医生考虑电子成角技术在比较临床研究和某些研究应用中的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信