Searching About Suicide and Crisis Hotlines Online: A Temporal and Geospatial Infodemiological Analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Jerome Visperas Cleofas
{"title":"Searching About Suicide and Crisis Hotlines Online: A Temporal and Geospatial Infodemiological Analysis.","authors":"Jerome Visperas Cleofas","doi":"10.1177/10783903261421540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suicide remains a leading global public health concern, and crisis hotlines are a critical preventive intervention. However, there is a paucity in studies about how population-level digital information-seeking behaviors for suicide and crisis hotlines evolve across time and countries.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to (1) examine temporal trends and seasonality of global Google searches for \"Suicide\" and \"Crisis Hotline,\" (2) analyze their temporal associations through cross-lagged correlations, and (3) identify country clusters based on all-time relative search volumes (RSVs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Monthly global RSVs (2004-2025) and country-level all-time RSVs were extracted from Google Trends. Time-series analyses included Seasonal and Trend decomposition using Loess (STL) decomposition, Kruskal-Wallis tests for seasonality, Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) forecasting, Pearson correlations, and cross-lagged correlations of raw and detrended series. <i>K</i>-means clustering was applied to country-level data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Suicide searches showed persistent baseline levels with spikes in 2009-2010, 2014, 2017-2018, and 2020-2021. Crisis hotline searches rose sharply from the late 2010s, accelerating during the COVID-19 period. Seasonality was significant for suicide but not for hotlines. Cross-lagged analysis showed a +22-month raw lag (<i>r</i> = .22) that disappeared after detrending, leaving only a contemporaneous association (<i>r</i> = .31). Four global clusters highlighted disparities in suicide versus crisis hotline interest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Google Trends can serve as a proxy for real-time public demand for suicide prevention resources. Findings emphasize the need for agile, context-sensitive strategies to strengthen hotline visibility and accessibility globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":17229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","volume":" ","pages":"348-362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903261421540","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Suicide remains a leading global public health concern, and crisis hotlines are a critical preventive intervention. However, there is a paucity in studies about how population-level digital information-seeking behaviors for suicide and crisis hotlines evolve across time and countries.

Aims: This study aimed to (1) examine temporal trends and seasonality of global Google searches for "Suicide" and "Crisis Hotline," (2) analyze their temporal associations through cross-lagged correlations, and (3) identify country clusters based on all-time relative search volumes (RSVs).

Method: Monthly global RSVs (2004-2025) and country-level all-time RSVs were extracted from Google Trends. Time-series analyses included Seasonal and Trend decomposition using Loess (STL) decomposition, Kruskal-Wallis tests for seasonality, Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) forecasting, Pearson correlations, and cross-lagged correlations of raw and detrended series. K-means clustering was applied to country-level data.

Results: Suicide searches showed persistent baseline levels with spikes in 2009-2010, 2014, 2017-2018, and 2020-2021. Crisis hotline searches rose sharply from the late 2010s, accelerating during the COVID-19 period. Seasonality was significant for suicide but not for hotlines. Cross-lagged analysis showed a +22-month raw lag (r = .22) that disappeared after detrending, leaving only a contemporaneous association (r = .31). Four global clusters highlighted disparities in suicide versus crisis hotline interest.

Conclusion: Google Trends can serve as a proxy for real-time public demand for suicide prevention resources. Findings emphasize the need for agile, context-sensitive strategies to strengthen hotline visibility and accessibility globally.

自杀和危机热线在线搜索:时空信息流行病学分析。
背景:自杀仍然是全球主要的公共卫生问题,危机热线是一种重要的预防干预措施。然而,关于人口层面的自杀和危机热线数字信息寻求行为如何随着时间和国家的变化而变化的研究很少。目的:本研究旨在(1)研究全球谷歌搜索“自杀”和“危机热线”的时间趋势和季节性,(2)通过交叉滞后相关性分析它们的时间关联,以及(3)基于历史相对搜索量(rsv)确定国家集群。方法:从谷歌Trends中提取2004-2025年全球月度RSVs和国家级历史RSVs。时间序列分析包括使用黄土(STL)分解的季节和趋势分解,季节性的Kruskal-Wallis检验,自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)预测,Pearson相关性以及原始和非趋势序列的交叉滞后相关性。k -均值聚类应用于国家级数据。结果:自杀搜索在2009-2010年、2014年、2017-2018年和2020-2021年显示出持续的基线水平峰值。危机热线的搜索量从2010年代末开始急剧上升,在2019冠状病毒病期间加速上升。季节性对自杀有显著影响,但对热线没有影响。交叉滞后分析显示,+22个月的原始滞后(r = 0.22)在去趋势化后消失,只留下同期关联(r = 0.31)。四个全球集群突出了自杀与危机热线兴趣的差异。结论:谷歌Trends可以作为公众对自杀预防资源实时需求的代理。调查结果强调,需要制定灵活的、对具体情况敏感的战略,以加强全球热线的可见性和可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (JAPNA) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal publishing up-to-date information to promote psychiatric nursing, improve mental health care for culturally diverse individuals, families, groups, and communities, as well as shape health care policy for the delivery of mental health services. JAPNA publishes both clinical and research articles relevant to psychiatric nursing. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书