Iohexol 240 mgr I/ml and metrizamide 240 mgr I/ml in lumbar myelography. Report from a randomized double blind study.

J Valk, G J Hazenberg, H van Duijn, F Crezee, R Olislagers-De Slegte
{"title":"Iohexol 240 mgr I/ml and metrizamide 240 mgr I/ml in lumbar myelography. Report from a randomized double blind study.","authors":"J Valk,&nbsp;G J Hazenberg,&nbsp;H van Duijn,&nbsp;F Crezee,&nbsp;R Olislagers-De Slegte","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A parallel, double blind, randomized study, comparing iohexol 240 mg I/ml and metrizamide 240 mg I/ml in lumbar myelography was carried out. Fifty patients were admitted to the study, and 1 patient was excluded after entry. Of the 49 patients included, 28 were males and 21 females, aged between 18 and 72 years. A dose of 10.5 ml of contrast medium was administered. A detailed neurological examination, and measurement of blood pressure and heart rate were performed before and 24 h after myelography. EEG was recorded in 37 patients. All patients were observed for adverse reactions for 48 h. Adverse reactions were reported in 14 of 26 patients examined with iohexol, and in 13 of 23 patients examined with metrizamide. EEG changes were observed in 7 patients examined with metrizamide, no changes were observed in patients examined with iohexol. The image quality was judged good or excellent in all cases, with the upper level of contrast medium brought to the level of L1 in the majority of cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":77706,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic imaging in clinical medicine","volume":"55 3","pages":"114-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic imaging in clinical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A parallel, double blind, randomized study, comparing iohexol 240 mg I/ml and metrizamide 240 mg I/ml in lumbar myelography was carried out. Fifty patients were admitted to the study, and 1 patient was excluded after entry. Of the 49 patients included, 28 were males and 21 females, aged between 18 and 72 years. A dose of 10.5 ml of contrast medium was administered. A detailed neurological examination, and measurement of blood pressure and heart rate were performed before and 24 h after myelography. EEG was recorded in 37 patients. All patients were observed for adverse reactions for 48 h. Adverse reactions were reported in 14 of 26 patients examined with iohexol, and in 13 of 23 patients examined with metrizamide. EEG changes were observed in 7 patients examined with metrizamide, no changes were observed in patients examined with iohexol. The image quality was judged good or excellent in all cases, with the upper level of contrast medium brought to the level of L1 in the majority of cases.

Iohexol 240 mgr I/ml和metrizamide 240 mgr I/ml用于腰椎造影。一项随机双盲研究报告。
进行了一项平行、双盲、随机研究,比较了碘己醇240 mg I/ml和甲咪唑胺240 mg I/ml在腰椎造影中的作用。50例患者入组,1例患者入组后被排除。49例患者中,男性28例,女性21例,年龄在18岁至72岁之间。给药10.5 ml造影剂。脊髓造影前和造影后24小时分别进行详细的神经学检查、血压和心率测量。记录了37例患者的脑电图。观察所有患者48小时的不良反应。26例使用碘己醇检查的患者中有14例报告了不良反应,23例使用甲咪唑胺检查的患者中有13例报告了不良反应。甲咪唑胺检查7例患者脑电图改变,碘己醇检查未见改变。所有病例的图像质量均为良好或优秀,大多数病例的对比介质的上一级达到L1水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信