Performance of the ABCD2 Score in a US Emergency Department Observation Unit.

Q3 Medicine
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1097/HPC.0000000000000413
Salvatore Lumia, Wesley Iobst, Zohayr Khan, Stephen Sokolosky, Benjamin T Hutchison, Amy Guzik, Mary A Wittler, Patrick S Reynolds, Nicklaus P Ashburn
{"title":"Performance of the ABCD2 Score in a US Emergency Department Observation Unit.","authors":"Salvatore Lumia, Wesley Iobst, Zohayr Khan, Stephen Sokolosky, Benjamin T Hutchison, Amy Guzik, Mary A Wittler, Patrick S Reynolds, Nicklaus P Ashburn","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ABCD2 score is a validated risk stratification tool used to quantify the risk of stroke within 48 hours among patients presenting with suspected transient ischemic attack (TIA). Limited data exist regarding its performance among patients in an emergency department observation unit (EDOU). The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of the ABCD2 score in a US EDOU cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational cohort study using the Wake Forest Emergency Medicine TIA Registry. Patients ≥18 years old who were evaluated for possible TIA in the EDOU of Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist from July 1, 2021 to December 1, 2023 were accrued. This analysis included patients without a persistent neurologic deficit, except for amaurosis fugax, vertigo, or paresthesias, as determined by the consulting neurologist and attending emergency physician. Patients were risk-stratified using the ABCD2 score as low- (0-3), moderate- (4-5), and high- (≥6) risk for short-term stroke. The primary safety outcome was index encounter stroke, as determined by the consulting neurologist and imaging. Efficacy was defined as the proportion of patients classified to the low-risk group. Negative predictive values and positive predictive values, and negative likelihood ratios and positive likelihood ratios for the ABCD2 score were calculated for index stroke and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 340 EDOU TIA patients, 55.9% (190/340) were female, 27.9% (95/340) were nonwhite, and the mean age was 67.1 ± 13.6 years. During the index visit, 21.8% (74/340) were diagnosed with acute stroke. The ABCD2 score classified 45.0% (153/340) as low-, 45.6% (155/340) as moderate-, and 9.4% (32/340) as high-risk. Of those identified as low-risk, 17.7% (27/153) had an index acute stroke. Negative predictive values and negative likelihood ratios of the ABCD2 score for index stroke were 63.5% (95% CI, 53.3-72.6) and 0.7 (95% CI, 0.5-1.1). Among patients classified as high-risk, 34.4% (11/32) had an index stroke, corresponding to a positive predictive value of 34.4% (95% CI, 20.9-50.9) and a positive likelihood ratio of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.0-3.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the ABCD2 score classified approximately half of patients as low-risk, nearly 20% of this group were diagnosed with an acute stroke during EDOU evaluation. These findings suggest that the ABCD2 score is not appropriate for ruling-out acute stroke among EDOU patients as it would lead to a high rate of missed strokes.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"e0413"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ABCD2 score is a validated risk stratification tool used to quantify the risk of stroke within 48 hours among patients presenting with suspected transient ischemic attack (TIA). Limited data exist regarding its performance among patients in an emergency department observation unit (EDOU). The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of the ABCD2 score in a US EDOU cohort.

Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study using the Wake Forest Emergency Medicine TIA Registry. Patients ≥18 years old who were evaluated for possible TIA in the EDOU of Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist from July 1, 2021 to December 1, 2023 were accrued. This analysis included patients without a persistent neurologic deficit, except for amaurosis fugax, vertigo, or paresthesias, as determined by the consulting neurologist and attending emergency physician. Patients were risk-stratified using the ABCD2 score as low- (0-3), moderate- (4-5), and high- (≥6) risk for short-term stroke. The primary safety outcome was index encounter stroke, as determined by the consulting neurologist and imaging. Efficacy was defined as the proportion of patients classified to the low-risk group. Negative predictive values and positive predictive values, and negative likelihood ratios and positive likelihood ratios for the ABCD2 score were calculated for index stroke and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Of the 340 EDOU TIA patients, 55.9% (190/340) were female, 27.9% (95/340) were nonwhite, and the mean age was 67.1 ± 13.6 years. During the index visit, 21.8% (74/340) were diagnosed with acute stroke. The ABCD2 score classified 45.0% (153/340) as low-, 45.6% (155/340) as moderate-, and 9.4% (32/340) as high-risk. Of those identified as low-risk, 17.7% (27/153) had an index acute stroke. Negative predictive values and negative likelihood ratios of the ABCD2 score for index stroke were 63.5% (95% CI, 53.3-72.6) and 0.7 (95% CI, 0.5-1.1). Among patients classified as high-risk, 34.4% (11/32) had an index stroke, corresponding to a positive predictive value of 34.4% (95% CI, 20.9-50.9) and a positive likelihood ratio of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.0-3.7).

Conclusions: Although the ABCD2 score classified approximately half of patients as low-risk, nearly 20% of this group were diagnosed with an acute stroke during EDOU evaluation. These findings suggest that the ABCD2 score is not appropriate for ruling-out acute stroke among EDOU patients as it would lead to a high rate of missed strokes.

ABCD2评分在美国急诊科观察单元的表现
背景:ABCD2评分是一种经过验证的风险分层工具,用于量化疑似短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者48小时内卒中的风险。关于其在急诊科观察单元(EDOU)患者中的表现的数据有限。本研究的目的是确定ABCD2评分在美国EDOU队列中的安全性和有效性。方法:我们使用维克森林急诊医学TIA登记处进行了一项观察性队列研究。在2021年7月1日至2023年12月1日期间,在Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist的EDOU中评估可能TIA的患者≥18岁。该分析包括没有持续性神经功能缺陷的患者,除了由咨询神经科医生和主治急诊医生确定的黑朦、眩晕或感觉异常。使用ABCD2评分对患者进行短期卒中风险分层,分为低(0-3)、中(4-5)和高(≥6)风险。主要的安全结果是中风指数,由神经科医生和影像学决定。疗效定义为低危组患者的比例。计算指数脑卒中ABCD2评分的阴性预测值和阳性预测值、阴性似然比和阳性似然比,并以95%置信区间(CI)报告。结果340例EDOU TIA患者中,女性占55.9%(190/340),非白人占27.9%(95/340),平均年龄67.1±13.6岁。在指标访视中,21.8%(74/340)被诊断为急性脑卒中。ABCD2评分为45.0%(153/340)为低,45.6%(155/340)为中,9.4%(32/340)为高危。在被确定为低风险的患者中,17.7%(27/153)有急性脑卒中指数。ABCD2评分对指数脑卒中的阴性预测值和阴性似然比分别为63.5% (95% CI, 53.3-72.6)和0.7 (95% CI, 0.5-1.1)。高危患者中,34.4%(11/32)发生指数卒中,对应阳性预测值为34.4% (95% CI, 20.9-50.9),阳性似然比为1.9 (95% CI, 1.0-3.7)。结论:尽管ABCD2评分将大约一半的患者归为低风险,但在EDOU评估中,近20%的患者被诊断为急性卒中。这些发现表明,ABCD2评分不适合用于排除EDOU患者的急性卒中,因为它会导致较高的卒中漏诊率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Pathways in Cardiology
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书