Florian Windler , George Zhong , Mark Coburn , Xiabing Xu , Florian Piekarski , Philippe Kruse , Birgit Bette , Pascal Siegert
{"title":"Reducing propofol waste during TIVA by pre-operative estimation of requirement: A single-center retrospective analysis","authors":"Florian Windler , George Zhong , Mark Coburn , Xiabing Xu , Florian Piekarski , Philippe Kruse , Birgit Bette , Pascal Siegert","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate whether estimating propofol requirement before surgery using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) model-based algorithm could reduce waste whilst maintaining workflow.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study with in silico TCI-TIVA simulations using the Eleveld model at fixed effect-site targets (Cet 2.5–4.0 μg.ml<sup>−1</sup>) or a Cet corresponding to an estimated BIS of 45 (EC<sub>BIS45</sub>). Monte-Carlo simulation examined uncertainty in surgical duration estimates.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>University tertiary care provider.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>229 adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with conventional propofol TIVA with manually adjusted infusion rate.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>Primary endpoint: predicted propofol amount for TCI and waste associated with three drawing-up strategies (50 ml vial only, 20 ml vial only, and vial combination based on estimated requirements). Secondary endpoint: relative number of syringe changes.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>Propofol requirements predicted using Cet 3.0 and EC<sub>BIS45</sub> were similar to actual consumption. Algorithm-guided drawing-up produced significantly lower predicted waste than conventional TIVA practice (<em>p</em> < 0.0001, CI = −61.0 to −27.0 mg/procedure for Cet 3.0; <em>p</em> = 0.001, CI = −60.0 to −26.7 mg/procedure for EC<sub>BIS45</sub>), comparable to the 20 ml vial-only strategy but requiring fewer syringe changes. Waste remained significantly lower despite surgical duration estimation errors up to 20% for Cet 3.0 (<em>p</em> = 0.007) and 30% for EC<sub>BIS45</sub> (<em>p</em> = 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using the Eleveld TCI model to estimate pre-operative propofol requirements could significantly reduce waste and avoid excessive syringe changes, even when surgical duration is uncertain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 112160"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818026000383","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate whether estimating propofol requirement before surgery using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) model-based algorithm could reduce waste whilst maintaining workflow.
Design
Retrospective cohort study with in silico TCI-TIVA simulations using the Eleveld model at fixed effect-site targets (Cet 2.5–4.0 μg.ml−1) or a Cet corresponding to an estimated BIS of 45 (ECBIS45). Monte-Carlo simulation examined uncertainty in surgical duration estimates.
Setting
University tertiary care provider.
Patients
229 adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with conventional propofol TIVA with manually adjusted infusion rate.
Measurements
Primary endpoint: predicted propofol amount for TCI and waste associated with three drawing-up strategies (50 ml vial only, 20 ml vial only, and vial combination based on estimated requirements). Secondary endpoint: relative number of syringe changes.
Main results
Propofol requirements predicted using Cet 3.0 and ECBIS45 were similar to actual consumption. Algorithm-guided drawing-up produced significantly lower predicted waste than conventional TIVA practice (p < 0.0001, CI = −61.0 to −27.0 mg/procedure for Cet 3.0; p = 0.001, CI = −60.0 to −26.7 mg/procedure for ECBIS45), comparable to the 20 ml vial-only strategy but requiring fewer syringe changes. Waste remained significantly lower despite surgical duration estimation errors up to 20% for Cet 3.0 (p = 0.007) and 30% for ECBIS45 (p = 0.01).
Conclusions
Using the Eleveld TCI model to estimate pre-operative propofol requirements could significantly reduce waste and avoid excessive syringe changes, even when surgical duration is uncertain.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained.
The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.