Enhancing participation with power-assist device: An exploratory study in manual wheelchair users.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1177/02692155261420658
Dounia Bouazzaoui, Violaine Leynaert, Philippe Gallien, Adelie Leffray, Cassandra Chaldaureille, Alexis Homs, Anthony Gelis
{"title":"Enhancing participation with power-assist device: An exploratory study in manual wheelchair users.","authors":"Dounia Bouazzaoui, Violaine Leynaert, Philippe Gallien, Adelie Leffray, Cassandra Chaldaureille, Alexis Homs, Anthony Gelis","doi":"10.1177/02692155261420658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of acquiring a power-assist device on participation.DesignProspective multicenter cohort study.SettingThree physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient centers.ParticipantsEighteen individuals with neurological impairments who primarily use manual wheelchairs for mobility.InterventionParticipants were followed throughout the process of acquiring a power-assisted mobility device, with assessments conducted at delivery, 3 months, and 6 months post-acquisition.Main outcome measuresParticipation (Wheelchair Outcome Measure), shoulder pain (Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index), wheelchair skills (Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire), and satisfaction with the device (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology). Evaluations were performed at baseline (pre-acquisition), delivery, and at 3 and 6 months.ResultsThirty-six participants were enrolled. Eighteen did not complete the study mostly due to funding difficulties and 18 completed the acquisition. Participation significantly increased, with WHOM scores rising from 19.33 ± 15.02 at baseline to 36.55 ± 17.06 at 3 months (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). WST-Q scores improved from 21.1 [19.9-23.7] at baseline to 25.2 [23.6-27.6] at 6 months (<i>p</i> = 0.0001). Although the overall WUSPI score did not change significantly, the mobility sub-score improved from 4.5 [0-9.2] at baseline to 0 [0-0] at 6 months (<i>p</i> = 0.03). Satisfaction with the device remained stable over time, with a consistent QUEST score of 3.3.ConclusionThe acquisition of a power-assist device may enhance participation, wheelchair skills, and reduce mobility-related shoulder pain in manual wheelchair users. Further comparative studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1098-1108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155261420658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of acquiring a power-assist device on participation.DesignProspective multicenter cohort study.SettingThree physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient centers.ParticipantsEighteen individuals with neurological impairments who primarily use manual wheelchairs for mobility.InterventionParticipants were followed throughout the process of acquiring a power-assisted mobility device, with assessments conducted at delivery, 3 months, and 6 months post-acquisition.Main outcome measuresParticipation (Wheelchair Outcome Measure), shoulder pain (Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index), wheelchair skills (Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire), and satisfaction with the device (Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology). Evaluations were performed at baseline (pre-acquisition), delivery, and at 3 and 6 months.ResultsThirty-six participants were enrolled. Eighteen did not complete the study mostly due to funding difficulties and 18 completed the acquisition. Participation significantly increased, with WHOM scores rising from 19.33 ± 15.02 at baseline to 36.55 ± 17.06 at 3 months (p = 0.0001). WST-Q scores improved from 21.1 [19.9-23.7] at baseline to 25.2 [23.6-27.6] at 6 months (p = 0.0001). Although the overall WUSPI score did not change significantly, the mobility sub-score improved from 4.5 [0-9.2] at baseline to 0 [0-0] at 6 months (p = 0.03). Satisfaction with the device remained stable over time, with a consistent QUEST score of 3.3.ConclusionThe acquisition of a power-assist device may enhance participation, wheelchair skills, and reduce mobility-related shoulder pain in manual wheelchair users. Further comparative studies are needed to confirm these findings.

使用助力装置增强参与:一项针对手动轮椅使用者的探索性研究。
目的评价获得动力辅助装置对参与的影响。前瞻性多中心队列研究。设有3个物理医学和康复门诊中心。参与者:18名主要使用手动轮椅进行活动的神经障碍患者。干预措施参与者在获得动力辅助移动设备的整个过程中被跟踪,并在交付、获得后3个月和6个月进行评估。主要结果测量:参与(轮椅结果测量)、肩痛(轮椅使用者肩痛指数)、轮椅技能(轮椅技能测试问卷)和对设备的满意度(魁北克用户对辅助技术满意度评估)。在基线(获取前)、交付以及3个月和6个月时进行评估。结果共纳入36例受试者。18个主要由于资金困难而没有完成研究,18个完成了收购。参与显著增加,who评分从基线时的19.33±15.02上升到3个月时的36.55±17.06 (p = 0.0001)。WST-Q评分从基线时的21.1[19.9-23.7]改善至6个月时的25.2 [23.6-27.6](p = 0.0001)。虽然总体的WUSPI评分没有显著变化,但活动度分值从基线时的4.5[0-9.2]提高到6个月时的0 [0-0](p = 0.03)。随着时间的推移,对该设备的满意度保持稳定,QUEST评分始终为3.3分。结论获得动力辅助装置可提高手动轮椅使用者的参与能力和轮椅技能,减少与活动相关的肩部疼痛。需要进一步的比较研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书