Bayley Assessment Score Revisions in High-risk Population After Release of new Normatives.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Desiree Starzyk, Jacob B W Holzman, Kelly Wolfe, Allison G Dempsey
{"title":"Bayley Assessment Score Revisions in High-risk Population After Release of new Normatives.","authors":"Desiree Starzyk, Jacob B W Holzman, Kelly Wolfe, Allison G Dempsey","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Fourth Edition (Bayley-4), which was released in 2019, received updated normative data in 2023, raising concerns about potential score shifts in previously collected data. This study examined whether developmental interpretations based on the original versus revised norms differ within a cohort of medically complex children.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Scores from 61 children assessed with the Bayley-4 before revised norms were released were used in this study. Frequency of changes in results across Standard Scores at the composite level (cognitive, language, motor) and paired samples t tests of original and new Standard Scores sets were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Score changes witnessed went beyond the publisher's descriptions that resulted in increases and decreases throughout several descriptive classifications that are used for clinical interpretation. Of the 3 domains analyzed, language scores showed a minor but statistically significant increase between sample sets ( p < 0.01), whereas motor and cognitive scores showed no significant difference ( p > 0.05). Only 1 change between original and revised scores in the motor domain resulted in a different descriptive classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although many of the revised scores on the Bayley-4 yielded minor differences, unanticipated changes were observed such as score decreases, classification change, and notable differences in mean language scores. Because of these discrepancies, researchers and clinicians using the Bayley-4 during 2019 to 2023 should consider re-evaluating scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e357-e361"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Fourth Edition (Bayley-4), which was released in 2019, received updated normative data in 2023, raising concerns about potential score shifts in previously collected data. This study examined whether developmental interpretations based on the original versus revised norms differ within a cohort of medically complex children.

Method: Scores from 61 children assessed with the Bayley-4 before revised norms were released were used in this study. Frequency of changes in results across Standard Scores at the composite level (cognitive, language, motor) and paired samples t tests of original and new Standard Scores sets were analyzed.

Results: Score changes witnessed went beyond the publisher's descriptions that resulted in increases and decreases throughout several descriptive classifications that are used for clinical interpretation. Of the 3 domains analyzed, language scores showed a minor but statistically significant increase between sample sets ( p < 0.01), whereas motor and cognitive scores showed no significant difference ( p > 0.05). Only 1 change between original and revised scores in the motor domain resulted in a different descriptive classification.

Conclusion: Although many of the revised scores on the Bayley-4 yielded minor differences, unanticipated changes were observed such as score decreases, classification change, and notable differences in mean language scores. Because of these discrepancies, researchers and clinicians using the Bayley-4 during 2019 to 2023 should consider re-evaluating scores.

新标准发布后高危人群Bayley评估评分的修订。
目的:2019年发布的Bayley婴幼儿发育量表第四版(Bayley-4)在2023年获得了更新的规范数据,这引起了人们对先前收集数据可能发生评分变化的担忧。本研究考察了在一组医学复杂的儿童中,基于原始规范和修订规范的发展解释是否存在差异。方法:采用修订前的Bayley-4量表对61例儿童进行评估。分析了综合水平(认知、语言、运动)标准分数结果变化的频率,以及原始和新标准分数集的配对样本t检验。结果:观察到的分数变化超出了出版商的描述,导致在用于临床解释的几个描述性分类中增加或减少。在分析的3个领域中,语言得分在样本集之间有轻微但有统计学意义的增加(p < 0.01),而运动和认知得分在样本集之间无显著差异(p < 0.05)。在运动领域的原始和修订分数之间只有1个变化导致了不同的描述性分类。结论:虽然许多修订后的Bayley-4得分产生了较小的差异,但仍观察到意想不到的变化,如得分下降、分类变化和平均语言得分的显着差异。由于这些差异,2019年至2023年期间使用Bayley-4的研究人员和临床医生应考虑重新评估评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书