A complex legacy: USAID, population control, and reproductive justice in Africa.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nimrod Muhumuza, Nana Koomson
{"title":"A complex legacy: USAID, population control, and reproductive justice in Africa.","authors":"Nimrod Muhumuza, Nana Koomson","doi":"10.1080/26410397.2026.2633926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>USAID's interventions have contributed significantly to improving maternal and child health, preventing HIV, and combating child marriage and gender-based violence. However, the agency's dissolution has highlighted the urgent need to reckon with its population control history. USAID's covert population control initiatives in the Global South were predicated on the flawed premise that burgeoning populations, rather than structural inequalities, were the primary cause of poverty and underdevelopment in those territories. These population policies, advanced by USAID in the early years of its work, resulted in violations of sexual and reproductive rights and were designed to secure Western access to agricultural land and mineral wealth on the African continent. Given this troubling history, this article argues that USAID must formally confront its past through institutional acknowledgement, establishment of comprehensive reparative mechanisms, and prioritisation of indigenous sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) programming alongside domestic resource mobilisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":37074,"journal":{"name":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","volume":" ","pages":"2633926"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12981252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2026.2633926","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

USAID's interventions have contributed significantly to improving maternal and child health, preventing HIV, and combating child marriage and gender-based violence. However, the agency's dissolution has highlighted the urgent need to reckon with its population control history. USAID's covert population control initiatives in the Global South were predicated on the flawed premise that burgeoning populations, rather than structural inequalities, were the primary cause of poverty and underdevelopment in those territories. These population policies, advanced by USAID in the early years of its work, resulted in violations of sexual and reproductive rights and were designed to secure Western access to agricultural land and mineral wealth on the African continent. Given this troubling history, this article argues that USAID must formally confront its past through institutional acknowledgement, establishment of comprehensive reparative mechanisms, and prioritisation of indigenous sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) programming alongside domestic resource mobilisation.

复杂的遗产:美国国际开发署、非洲的人口控制和生殖正义。
美国国际开发署的干预措施为改善孕产妇和儿童健康、预防艾滋病毒、打击童婚和性别暴力作出了重大贡献。然而,该机构的解散凸显了考虑其人口控制历史的迫切需要。美国国际开发署在全球南方的秘密人口控制计划是建立在一个有缺陷的前提之上的,即迅速增长的人口,而不是结构性不平等,是这些地区贫困和不发达的主要原因。美国国际开发署在其早期工作中推行的这些人口政策导致性权利和生殖权利受到侵犯,其目的是确保西方国家获得非洲大陆的农业用地和矿产资源。鉴于这段令人不安的历史,本文认为,美国国际开发署必须正式面对它的过去,通过制度承认,建立全面的补救机制,优先考虑土著性健康和生殖健康及权利(SRHR)规划,同时调动国内资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: SRHM is a multidisciplinary journal, welcoming submissions from a wide range of disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities, behavioural science, public health, human rights and law. The journal welcomes a range of methodological approaches, including qualitative and quantitative analyses such as policy analysis; mixed methods approaches to public health and health systems research; economic, political and historical analysis; and epidemiological work with a focus on SRHR. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based and other forms of interpersonal violence, young people, gender, sexuality, sexual rights and sexual pleasure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书