"To me, it was overwhelming": a mixed methods study of maternal healthcare in a marginalised community in New York City, guided by the person-centered care framework for reproductive health equity.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Khadija R Jones, Nandini Choudhury, Mary Archana Fernandez, George Hagopian, Rachel Schwartz, Adiba Chowdhury, Sushmita Diyali, Keeley McNamara, Hugo Teo, Payal Ram, Andrea Archer, Amanda Misiti, Teresa Janevic, Sheela Maru
{"title":"\"To me, it was overwhelming\": a mixed methods study of maternal healthcare in a marginalised community in New York City, guided by the person-centered care framework for reproductive health equity.","authors":"Khadija R Jones, Nandini Choudhury, Mary Archana Fernandez, George Hagopian, Rachel Schwartz, Adiba Chowdhury, Sushmita Diyali, Keeley McNamara, Hugo Teo, Payal Ram, Andrea Archer, Amanda Misiti, Teresa Janevic, Sheela Maru","doi":"10.1080/26410397.2026.2632452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Person-Centered Care Framework for Reproductive Health Equity (PCC) elucidates drivers of health disparities: community determinants, health-seeking behaviours and quality of care. Limited studies assess person-centered maternal healthcare in underserved populations. Racial and ethnic disparities in maternal health were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. We applied PCC to evaluate factors influencing maternal healthcare at two public hospitals in NYC before and during the pandemic. We conducted mixed-method, community-engaged research using PCC. A cross-sectional study using EHR data from 5330 pregnant individuals in 2019 assessed factors related to inadequate maternity care utilisation. Qualitative research in 2020 explored perceptions of maternal health equity, barriers, and healthcare quality through 17 in-depth interviews and five focus group discussions with postpartum women, clinicians, and community-organisation staff. Among 3181 women, 90% had public insurance, and 95% were people of colour. Using the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilisation index, 1648 (51.8%) received no or inadequate prenatal care and 1267 (40%) lacked postpartum care. Women aged 18-24, Black women, Arabic-speaking women and those who used tobacco during pregnancy appeared more likely to experience inadequate care. Qualitative data identified community-level determinants, namely health literacy and economic status. Health-seeking barriers included social distancing, telehealth and immigration status. Quality of care issues included disruptions in healthcare delivery, patient-provider experience and continuity of care. Findings indicate disparities in maternal healthcare utilisation, which are likely downstream effects of broader social inequities. Addressing these disparities requires rights-based, community-informed policies that guarantee equitable, respectful and accessible maternal care for all.</p>","PeriodicalId":37074,"journal":{"name":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","volume":" ","pages":"2632452"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13011086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2026.2632452","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Person-Centered Care Framework for Reproductive Health Equity (PCC) elucidates drivers of health disparities: community determinants, health-seeking behaviours and quality of care. Limited studies assess person-centered maternal healthcare in underserved populations. Racial and ethnic disparities in maternal health were exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. We applied PCC to evaluate factors influencing maternal healthcare at two public hospitals in NYC before and during the pandemic. We conducted mixed-method, community-engaged research using PCC. A cross-sectional study using EHR data from 5330 pregnant individuals in 2019 assessed factors related to inadequate maternity care utilisation. Qualitative research in 2020 explored perceptions of maternal health equity, barriers, and healthcare quality through 17 in-depth interviews and five focus group discussions with postpartum women, clinicians, and community-organisation staff. Among 3181 women, 90% had public insurance, and 95% were people of colour. Using the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilisation index, 1648 (51.8%) received no or inadequate prenatal care and 1267 (40%) lacked postpartum care. Women aged 18-24, Black women, Arabic-speaking women and those who used tobacco during pregnancy appeared more likely to experience inadequate care. Qualitative data identified community-level determinants, namely health literacy and economic status. Health-seeking barriers included social distancing, telehealth and immigration status. Quality of care issues included disruptions in healthcare delivery, patient-provider experience and continuity of care. Findings indicate disparities in maternal healthcare utilisation, which are likely downstream effects of broader social inequities. Addressing these disparities requires rights-based, community-informed policies that guarantee equitable, respectful and accessible maternal care for all.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

“对我来说,这是压倒性的”:在以人为本的生殖健康平等护理框架的指导下,对纽约市一个边缘化社区的孕产妇保健进行的混合方法研究。
以人为中心的生殖健康平等护理框架(PCC)阐明了健康差异的驱动因素:社区决定因素、求医行为和护理质量。有限的研究评估了服务不足人群中以人为中心的孕产妇保健。COVID-19大流行加剧了孕产妇保健方面的种族和族裔差异。我们应用PCC评估影响纽约市两家公立医院在大流行之前和期间孕产妇保健的因素。我们使用PCC进行了混合方法、社区参与的研究。一项利用2019年5330名孕妇的电子病历数据进行的横断面研究评估了与产妇保健利用不足相关的因素。2020年的定性研究通过与产后妇女、临床医生和社区组织工作人员进行17次深度访谈和5次焦点小组讨论,探讨了对孕产妇健康公平、障碍和医疗保健质量的看法。在3181名女性中,90%有公共保险,95%是有色人种。利用产前护理利用充足性指数,1648例(51.8%)未接受产前护理或产前护理不足;1267例(40%)缺乏产后护理。年龄在18-24岁的女性、黑人女性、说阿拉伯语的女性以及在怀孕期间使用烟草的女性似乎更有可能遇到护理不足的问题。定性数据确定了社区一级的决定因素,即卫生知识普及和经济地位。寻求健康的障碍包括社交距离、远程医疗和移民身份。护理质量问题包括医疗保健服务中断、患者-提供者体验和护理的连续性。调查结果表明,孕产妇保健利用方面的差异可能是更广泛的社会不平等的下游影响。解决这些差异需要以权利为基础、社区知情的政策,确保所有人获得公平、尊重和可获得的孕产妇保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: SRHM is a multidisciplinary journal, welcoming submissions from a wide range of disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities, behavioural science, public health, human rights and law. The journal welcomes a range of methodological approaches, including qualitative and quantitative analyses such as policy analysis; mixed methods approaches to public health and health systems research; economic, political and historical analysis; and epidemiological work with a focus on SRHR. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based and other forms of interpersonal violence, young people, gender, sexuality, sexual rights and sexual pleasure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书