The effect of combination antibiotic therapy on mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections: a systematic review.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Caglayan Merve Ayaz, Ozlem Cakin, Selma Turan Kavradım, Mestan Emek, Melike Yüce Aktepe, Zeynep Özer
{"title":"The effect of combination antibiotic therapy on mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock due to <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> bloodstream infections: a systematic review.","authors":"Caglayan Merve Ayaz, Ozlem Cakin, Selma Turan Kavradım, Mestan Emek, Melike Yüce Aktepe, Zeynep Özer","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2026.2635427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong><i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> bloodstream infections (BSIs) complicated by sepsis or septic shock are associated with high mortality. Although combination antibiotic therapy may increase early antimicrobial coverage, its effect on survival remains uncertain. This systematic review evaluated the impact of appropriate empirical and definitive combination therapy compared with monotherapy on mortality in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched eight databases through 31 August 2025, for studies enrolling adults with sepsis or septic shock due to confirmed P. aeruginosa BSIs that compared combination therapy with monotherapy. Data on study characteristics, treatment phase, and mortality outcomes were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I, and certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight observational studies including 1201 patients met the inclusion criteria. No consistent survival benefit was observed with definitive combination therapy. Some studies assessing empirical therapy reported lower mortality in selected high-risk subgroups; however, results were characterized by substantial clinical heterogeneity. Adverse events were infrequently reported, and overall certainty of evidence was very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence does not support routine use of combination therapy over monotherapy. Empirical combination therapy may be considered in carefully selected high-risk patients, with prompt de-escalation once susceptibilities are known.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"259-269"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2026.2635427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections (BSIs) complicated by sepsis or septic shock are associated with high mortality. Although combination antibiotic therapy may increase early antimicrobial coverage, its effect on survival remains uncertain. This systematic review evaluated the impact of appropriate empirical and definitive combination therapy compared with monotherapy on mortality in this population.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched eight databases through 31 August 2025, for studies enrolling adults with sepsis or septic shock due to confirmed P. aeruginosa BSIs that compared combination therapy with monotherapy. Data on study characteristics, treatment phase, and mortality outcomes were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I, and certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE.

Results: Eight observational studies including 1201 patients met the inclusion criteria. No consistent survival benefit was observed with definitive combination therapy. Some studies assessing empirical therapy reported lower mortality in selected high-risk subgroups; however, results were characterized by substantial clinical heterogeneity. Adverse events were infrequently reported, and overall certainty of evidence was very low.

Conclusions: Current evidence does not support routine use of combination therapy over monotherapy. Empirical combination therapy may be considered in carefully selected high-risk patients, with prompt de-escalation once susceptibilities are known.

联合抗生素治疗对铜绿假单胞菌血流感染脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者死亡率的影响:一项系统综述。
铜绿假单胞菌血流感染(bsi)合并脓毒症或脓毒性休克具有高死亡率。虽然联合抗生素治疗可能增加早期抗菌药物的覆盖率,但其对生存的影响仍不确定。本系统综述评估了适当的经验性和确定性联合治疗与单一治疗对该人群死亡率的影响。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,我们系统地检索了截至2025年8月31日的8个数据库,纳入了由铜绿假单胞菌BSIs引起的脓毒症或脓毒性休克的成人研究,并将联合治疗与单一治疗进行了比较。提取有关研究特征、治疗阶段和死亡率结果的数据。使用ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。结果:8项观察性研究包括1201例患者符合纳入标准。最终联合治疗未观察到一致的生存获益。一些评估经验性治疗的研究报告,在选定的高风险亚群中死亡率较低;然而,结果具有明显的临床异质性。不良事件很少被报道,证据的总体确定性非常低。结论:目前的证据不支持常规使用联合治疗优于单一治疗。在精心挑选的高危患者中,可以考虑经验性联合治疗,一旦知道了敏感性,就立即降级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy (ISSN 1478-7210) provides expert reviews on therapeutics and diagnostics in the treatment of infectious disease. Coverage includes antibiotics, drug resistance, drug therapy, infectious disease medicine, antibacterial, antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral approaches, and diagnostic tests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书