Three-part random effect models for longitudinal skewed survey data with "not applicable" responses.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Eugenia Buta, Patricia Simon, Ralitza Gueorguieva
{"title":"Three-part random effect models for longitudinal skewed survey data with \"not applicable\" responses.","authors":"Eugenia Buta, Patricia Simon, Ralitza Gueorguieva","doi":"10.3102/10769986251318028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In survey data some questions are asked only of a subset of applicable participants. This frequently occurs together with floor effects of the provided responses. For example, in the longitudinal Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) survey, nicotine dependence is assessed only for a sub-sample of individuals at each occasion and when assessed often has value at the lower end of the scale. To capture trends over time in an unbiased and efficient way, it is important to jointly model the probabilities of being asked the questions of interest, of giving a response at the lower end of the scale and of the mean response when above the lower end of the scale. We propose a three-part model for such data which consists of two logistic sub-models and a truncated normal model. Correlations among repeated observations on the same individual are induced by random effects. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference is performed in SAS PROC NLMIXED. The PATH data on young adults are used for illustration. A simulation study investigates bias and efficiency of the three-part model compared to simpler models. The three-part model has much lower bias and better coverage probabilities for the regression coefficients than simpler models.</p>","PeriodicalId":48001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12912802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986251318028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In survey data some questions are asked only of a subset of applicable participants. This frequently occurs together with floor effects of the provided responses. For example, in the longitudinal Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) survey, nicotine dependence is assessed only for a sub-sample of individuals at each occasion and when assessed often has value at the lower end of the scale. To capture trends over time in an unbiased and efficient way, it is important to jointly model the probabilities of being asked the questions of interest, of giving a response at the lower end of the scale and of the mean response when above the lower end of the scale. We propose a three-part model for such data which consists of two logistic sub-models and a truncated normal model. Correlations among repeated observations on the same individual are induced by random effects. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference is performed in SAS PROC NLMIXED. The PATH data on young adults are used for illustration. A simulation study investigates bias and efficiency of the three-part model compared to simpler models. The three-part model has much lower bias and better coverage probabilities for the regression coefficients than simpler models.

具有“不适用”响应的纵向倾斜调查数据的三部分随机效应模型。
在调查数据中,有些问题只问了一小部分适用的参与者。这种情况经常与所提供响应的底部效应一起发生。例如,在烟草与健康纵向人口评估(PATH)调查中,每次只对个人的子样本进行尼古丁依赖评估,评估时往往具有较低范围的价值。为了以无偏见和有效的方式捕捉随时间推移的趋势,重要的是要联合建模被问到感兴趣的问题的概率,在尺度的低端给出回应的概率,以及在尺度的低端之上给出平均回应的概率。我们提出了一个由两个逻辑子模型和一个截断正态模型组成的三部分模型。对同一个体的重复观察之间的相关性是由随机效应引起的。最大似然估计和推理在SAS PROC nlmix中进行。本文使用适宜卫生技术方案关于年轻人的数据作说明。仿真研究了与简单模型相比,三部分模型的偏差和效率。与简单模型相比,三部分模型具有更低的偏差和更好的回归系数覆盖概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, sponsored jointly by the American Educational Research Association and the American Statistical Association, publishes articles that are original and provide methods that are useful to those studying problems and issues in educational or behavioral research. Typical papers introduce new methods of analysis. Critical reviews of current practice, tutorial presentations of less well known methods, and novel applications of already-known methods are also of interest. Papers discussing statistical techniques without specific educational or behavioral interest or focusing on substantive results without developing new statistical methods or models or making novel use of existing methods have lower priority. Simulation studies, either to demonstrate properties of an existing method or to compare several existing methods (without providing a new method), also have low priority. The Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics provides an outlet for papers that are original and provide methods that are useful to those studying problems and issues in educational or behavioral research. Typical papers introduce new methods of analysis, provide properties of these methods, and an example of use in education or behavioral research. Critical reviews of current practice, tutorial presentations of less well known methods, and novel applications of already-known methods are also sometimes accepted. Papers discussing statistical techniques without specific educational or behavioral interest or focusing on substantive results without developing new statistical methods or models or making novel use of existing methods have lower priority. Simulation studies, either to demonstrate properties of an existing method or to compare several existing methods (without providing a new method), also have low priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书