Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

IF 22.6 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes Care Pub Date : 2026-02-17 DOI:10.2337/dc25-2577
Yunha Noh, Hui Yin, Inès Ben Ghezala, Oriana H.Y. Yu, Samy Suissa, Laurent Azoulay
{"title":"Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Risk of Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"Yunha Noh, Hui Yin, Inès Ben Ghezala, Oriana H.Y. Yu, Samy Suissa, Laurent Azoulay","doi":"10.2337/dc25-2577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE To estimate the effect of initiating glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors on incident nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) among adults with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This active-comparator, new-user cohort emulated a pragmatic target trial using the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients aged ≥18 years with a physician diagnosis of type 2 diabetes who newly initiated a GLP-1 RA or a DPP-4 inhibitor were included. DPP-4 inhibitors were selected as the comparator because they may be used as second-line treatment, like GLP-1 RAs, and have no established association with NAION. We estimated risks, risk differences (RDs), and risk ratios (RRs) of incident NAION, adjusted using propensity-score fine-stratification weighting. RESULTS At 1 year, there were 14 NAION events among 106,858 GLP-1 RA initiators (18.5 per 100,000) and 53 among 416,369 DPP-4 inhibitor initiators (7.2 per 100,000). GLP-1 RAs were associated with an increased risk of NAION compared with DPP-4 inhibitors (RR 2.56; 95% CI 1.44–4.86; RD 11.3 per 100,000). The risk of NAION was higher during the first 6 months of use, diminishing with longer duration of use, and was higher in patients aged <50 years, men, ever-smokers, and those with ≥1% hemoglobin A1c reduction. CONCLUSIONS GLP-1 RAs were associated with an increased 1-year risk of NAION compared with DPP-4 inhibitors among adults with type 2 diabetes, particularly in younger patients, men, ever-smokers, and patients with a marked hemoglobin A1c reduction.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"199 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-2577","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To estimate the effect of initiating glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors on incident nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) among adults with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This active-comparator, new-user cohort emulated a pragmatic target trial using the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients aged ≥18 years with a physician diagnosis of type 2 diabetes who newly initiated a GLP-1 RA or a DPP-4 inhibitor were included. DPP-4 inhibitors were selected as the comparator because they may be used as second-line treatment, like GLP-1 RAs, and have no established association with NAION. We estimated risks, risk differences (RDs), and risk ratios (RRs) of incident NAION, adjusted using propensity-score fine-stratification weighting. RESULTS At 1 year, there were 14 NAION events among 106,858 GLP-1 RA initiators (18.5 per 100,000) and 53 among 416,369 DPP-4 inhibitor initiators (7.2 per 100,000). GLP-1 RAs were associated with an increased risk of NAION compared with DPP-4 inhibitors (RR 2.56; 95% CI 1.44–4.86; RD 11.3 per 100,000). The risk of NAION was higher during the first 6 months of use, diminishing with longer duration of use, and was higher in patients aged <50 years, men, ever-smokers, and those with ≥1% hemoglobin A1c reduction. CONCLUSIONS GLP-1 RAs were associated with an increased 1-year risk of NAION compared with DPP-4 inhibitors among adults with type 2 diabetes, particularly in younger patients, men, ever-smokers, and patients with a marked hemoglobin A1c reduction.
胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂与2型糖尿病患者非动脉性前缺血性视神经病变的风险
目的评估胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)与二肽基肽酶4 (DPP-4)抑制剂对2型糖尿病成人非动脉前缺血性视神经病变(NAION)的影响。研究设计和方法:该研究采用英国临床实践研究数据链模拟了一项实用的目标试验。年龄≥18岁,经医生诊断为2型糖尿病且新开始GLP-1 RA或DPP-4抑制剂的患者被纳入研究。之所以选择DPP-4抑制剂作为比较物,是因为它们可以像GLP-1 RAs一样用作二线治疗,并且与NAION没有确定的关联。我们估计了NAION事件的风险、风险差异(RDs)和风险比(rr),并使用倾向评分精细分层加权进行了调整。1年时,106,858例GLP-1 RA启动者中有14例NAION事件(18.5 / 100,000),416,369例DPP-4抑制剂启动者中有53例(7.2 / 100,000)。与DPP-4抑制剂相比,GLP-1 RAs与NAION风险增加相关(RR 2.56; 95% CI 1.44-4.86; RD 11.3 / 100,000)。NAION的风险在使用的前6个月较高,随着使用时间的延长而降低,在年龄较大的患者中更高。50岁,男性,有吸烟史,糖化血红蛋白降低≥1%。结论:与DPP-4抑制剂相比,GLP-1 RAs与成人2型糖尿病患者1年内发生NAION的风险增加相关,特别是在年轻患者、男性、吸烟者和A1c明显降低的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Care
Diabetes Care 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
27.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
449
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes. Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书