Reconceptualizing Forensic Nursing in South Africa: A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis.

IF 0.9
Tania de Villiers, Nicholas Metheny
{"title":"Reconceptualizing Forensic Nursing in South Africa: A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis.","authors":"Tania de Villiers, Nicholas Metheny","doi":"10.1097/JFN.0000000000000599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>South Africa has among the world's highest rates of sexual violence. Evidence shows that nurse-led forensic care improves health and legal outcomes, yet formal forensic nursing education remains undeveloped.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine facilitators and barriers to developing and sustaining forensic nursing curricula in the Western Cape province of South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from eight key informant interviews were analyzed using a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) framework.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Strengths included committed clinical champions and institutional memory from prior initiatives. Weaknesses included shortages of trained educators, limited clinical training sites, and inadequate psychosocial support. Opportunities included existing sexual offences infrastructure, government support for decentralization, and recognition of nurses' roles in post-assault care. Threats included unclear regulatory guidance, professional hierarchies, and lack of formal posts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sustainable forensic nursing practice is feasible and urgently needed. Implementation should include regulatory engagement, institutional investment, and psychosocial supports to strengthen survivor-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: South Africa has among the world's highest rates of sexual violence. Evidence shows that nurse-led forensic care improves health and legal outcomes, yet formal forensic nursing education remains undeveloped.

Aim: To examine facilitators and barriers to developing and sustaining forensic nursing curricula in the Western Cape province of South Africa.

Methods: Data from eight key informant interviews were analyzed using a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) framework.

Findings: Strengths included committed clinical champions and institutional memory from prior initiatives. Weaknesses included shortages of trained educators, limited clinical training sites, and inadequate psychosocial support. Opportunities included existing sexual offences infrastructure, government support for decentralization, and recognition of nurses' roles in post-assault care. Threats included unclear regulatory guidance, professional hierarchies, and lack of formal posts.

Conclusions: Sustainable forensic nursing practice is feasible and urgently needed. Implementation should include regulatory engagement, institutional investment, and psychosocial supports to strengthen survivor-centered care.

重新定义南非的法医护理:优势,劣势,机会和威胁(SWOT)分析。
背景:南非是世界上性暴力发生率最高的国家之一。有证据表明,护士主导的法医护理改善了健康和法律结果,但正式的法医护理教育仍然不发达。目的:研究在南非西开普省发展和维持法医护理课程的促进因素和障碍。方法:采用优势、劣势、机会和威胁(SWOT)框架对八个关键信息者访谈的数据进行分析。研究结果:优势包括忠诚的临床拥护者和先前倡议的机构记忆。不足之处包括缺乏训练有素的教育工作者、有限的临床培训地点和不充分的社会心理支持。机会包括现有的性犯罪基础设施,政府对权力下放的支持,以及承认护士在性侵犯后护理中的作用。威胁包括不明确的监管指导、专业等级制度和缺乏正式职位。结论:可持续的法医护理实践是可行的,也是迫切需要的。实施应包括监管参与、机构投资和社会心理支持,以加强以幸存者为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书