Modalities and algorithms for generalized motor seizure detection and prediction: a scoping review.

IF 2.7
Expert review of medical devices Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-02 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2026.2632757
Ahmed Wesal, Farida Hesham, Mohamed A M Gad, Mostafa Abdelrahim, Nariman Ahmed Sayed, Nour Bahgat, Nour Allah Zaki, Aliaa Rehan Youssef
{"title":"Modalities and algorithms for generalized motor seizure detection and prediction: a scoping review.","authors":"Ahmed Wesal, Farida Hesham, Mohamed A M Gad, Mostafa Abdelrahim, Nariman Ahmed Sayed, Nour Bahgat, Nour Allah Zaki, Aliaa Rehan Youssef","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2026.2632757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Generalized tonic - clonic seizures (GTCS) is a major cause of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP); thus, continuous monitoring is essential. Electroencephalography (EEG) is the diagnostic gold standard; however, non-EEG wearables have emerged as promising, user-friendly alternatives enhancing comfort, mobility, and social acceptance.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This scoping review compared sensing modalities and computational methods used for seizure detection and prediction, identified effective sensor combinations, and highlighted current research gaps. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed databases were searched up to 22 April 2025. Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. For seizure detection, combining electrodermal activity (EDA) with motion sensors - accelerometers (ACC) and gyroscopes (GYR) - and surface electromyography (sEMG) achieved high reliability, 98.6% precision, while using ACC and EDA alone yielded superior sensitivities up to 97.2% and a lower false alarm rate (FAR) of 0.53/24 h. Regarding seizure prediction, combining EDA, blood volume pulse (BVP), ACC, and temperature showed the highest sensitivity of 75.6%.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Wearable multimodal non-EEG seizure detection and prediction systems offer personalized care but face validation, hardware, and privacy hurdles. Future success depends on efficient AI, IoT integration, patient-centric design, and clear regulations ensuring accessible and trustworthy clinical tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"409-424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2026.2632757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Generalized tonic - clonic seizures (GTCS) is a major cause of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP); thus, continuous monitoring is essential. Electroencephalography (EEG) is the diagnostic gold standard; however, non-EEG wearables have emerged as promising, user-friendly alternatives enhancing comfort, mobility, and social acceptance.

Areas covered: This scoping review compared sensing modalities and computational methods used for seizure detection and prediction, identified effective sensor combinations, and highlighted current research gaps. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed databases were searched up to 22 April 2025. Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. For seizure detection, combining electrodermal activity (EDA) with motion sensors - accelerometers (ACC) and gyroscopes (GYR) - and surface electromyography (sEMG) achieved high reliability, 98.6% precision, while using ACC and EDA alone yielded superior sensitivities up to 97.2% and a lower false alarm rate (FAR) of 0.53/24 h. Regarding seizure prediction, combining EDA, blood volume pulse (BVP), ACC, and temperature showed the highest sensitivity of 75.6%.

Expert opinion: Wearable multimodal non-EEG seizure detection and prediction systems offer personalized care but face validation, hardware, and privacy hurdles. Future success depends on efficient AI, IoT integration, patient-centric design, and clear regulations ensuring accessible and trustworthy clinical tools.

广义运动发作检测和预测的模式和算法:范围回顾。
全身性强直-阵挛性发作(GTCS)是最严重的癫痫发作类型之一,也是癫痫(SUDEP)患者猝死的主要原因。持续监测至关重要,特别是对耐药癫痫患者。虽然脑电图(EEG)仍然是诊断的金标准,但非脑电图可穿戴系统已经成为有前途的、用户友好的替代方案,增强了舒适性、移动性和社会接受度。涵盖领域:该范围综述比较了用于癫痫检测和预测的传感模式和计算方法,确定了有效的传感器组合,并强调了当前的研究差距。按照PRISMA-ScR指南,检索了截止到2025年4月22日的Scopus、IEEE Xplore和PubMed三个数据库。29项研究符合纳入标准(26项为检测,3项为预测)。结合皮电活动(EDA)与运动传感器-加速度计(ACC),陀螺仪(GYR)和表面肌电图(sEMG) -获得了最高的检测性能(95.2%的灵敏度,98.6%的精度,误报率(FAR) 0.64/24 h)。在癫痫发作预测方面,HR数据显示有希望获得足够的癫痫发作预测信息,灵敏度为62%。专家意见:可穿戴式多模态非脑电图癫痫检测和预测系统提供个性化护理,但存在面部验证、硬件和隐私障碍。未来的成功取决于高效的人工智能、物联网集成、以患者为中心的设计以及确保临床工具可获得和值得信赖的明确法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书