Accuracy and reliability of preoperative CT in perforated diverticulitis: Post hoc secondary analysis from the SCANDIV trial.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Scandinavian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-15 DOI:10.1177/14574969261418419
Johannes K Schultz, Johanna M Sigurdardottir, Linda T Backstad, Arnar Thorisson, Sheraz Yaqub, Abbas Chabok, Tom Øresland, Peter M Lauritzen
{"title":"Accuracy and reliability of preoperative CT in perforated diverticulitis: Post hoc secondary analysis from the SCANDIV trial.","authors":"Johannes K Schultz, Johanna M Sigurdardottir, Linda T Backstad, Arnar Thorisson, Sheraz Yaqub, Abbas Chabok, Tom Øresland, Peter M Lauritzen","doi":"10.1177/14574969261418419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Undetected cancers and fecal contamination in perforated diverticulitis may lead to failure of laparoscopic lavage. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative computed tomography (CT) examinations and the interobserver agreement for detecting colonic malignancy and fecal contamination in patients with perforated diverticulitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 198 patients with suspected perforated diverticulitis from the SCANDIV trial, randomized to laparoscopic lavage or primary resection. CT examinations of all patients were independently reviewed by two specialists in abdominal radiology, and features of fecal contamination and colonic malignancy were registered and compared to the surgical reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At surgery, fecal contamination was described in 33 patients and was diagnosed on CT in 7 of those by both radiologists (sensitivity = 21%, specificity = 96%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 50%, and negative predictive value (NPV) = 86%) and in 25 patients by at least one of the radiologists (sensitivity = 76%, specificity = 63%, PPV = 29%, and NPV = 93%). Interobserver agreement between radiologists was 64% for fecal contamination (kappa = 0.18, SE = 0.05; p < 0.001). In 7 of 12 patients who turned out to have colon cancer, this was suspected at CT by at least one radiologist (sensitivity = 58%, specificity = 91%, PPV = 29%, NPV = 97%). Interobserver agreement between radiologists for suspected colonic malignancy was 92% (kappa = 0.46; SE = 0.12; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this selected cohort of patients with suspected perforated diverticulitis, re-evaluation of CT scans proved unreliable for detecting malignancies and fecal contamination. This suggests that preoperative CT cannot replace follow-up colonoscopy or colonography following laparoscopic lavage.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"137-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969261418419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Undetected cancers and fecal contamination in perforated diverticulitis may lead to failure of laparoscopic lavage. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative computed tomography (CT) examinations and the interobserver agreement for detecting colonic malignancy and fecal contamination in patients with perforated diverticulitis.

Methods: This study included 198 patients with suspected perforated diverticulitis from the SCANDIV trial, randomized to laparoscopic lavage or primary resection. CT examinations of all patients were independently reviewed by two specialists in abdominal radiology, and features of fecal contamination and colonic malignancy were registered and compared to the surgical reports.

Results: At surgery, fecal contamination was described in 33 patients and was diagnosed on CT in 7 of those by both radiologists (sensitivity = 21%, specificity = 96%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 50%, and negative predictive value (NPV) = 86%) and in 25 patients by at least one of the radiologists (sensitivity = 76%, specificity = 63%, PPV = 29%, and NPV = 93%). Interobserver agreement between radiologists was 64% for fecal contamination (kappa = 0.18, SE = 0.05; p < 0.001). In 7 of 12 patients who turned out to have colon cancer, this was suspected at CT by at least one radiologist (sensitivity = 58%, specificity = 91%, PPV = 29%, NPV = 97%). Interobserver agreement between radiologists for suspected colonic malignancy was 92% (kappa = 0.46; SE = 0.12; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In this selected cohort of patients with suspected perforated diverticulitis, re-evaluation of CT scans proved unreliable for detecting malignancies and fecal contamination. This suggests that preoperative CT cannot replace follow-up colonoscopy or colonography following laparoscopic lavage.

术前CT诊断穿孔性憩室炎的准确性和可靠性:SCANDIV试验的事后分析
背景与目的:穿孔性憩室炎患者未被发现的癌症和粪便污染可能导致腹腔镜灌洗失败。本研究旨在评估术前CT检查诊断穿孔性憩室炎患者结肠恶性肿瘤和粪便污染的准确性和观察者间的一致性。方法:本研究纳入了来自SCANDIV试验的198例疑似穿孔性憩室炎患者,随机分为腹腔镜灌洗组或原发性切除术组。所有患者的CT检查由两名腹部放射学专家独立审查,记录粪便污染和结肠恶性肿瘤的特征,并与手术报告进行比较。结果:在手术中,33例患者描述了粪便污染,其中7例由两名放射科医生(敏感性= 21%,特异性= 96%,阳性预测值(PPV) = 50%,阴性预测值(NPV) = 86%)在CT上诊断,25例患者由至少一名放射科医生(敏感性= 76%,特异性= 63%,PPV = 29%, NPV = 93%)诊断。在粪便污染方面,放射科医师之间的一致性为64% (kappa = 0.18, SE = 0.05; p)。结论:在这组疑似穿孔性憩室炎的患者中,重新评估CT扫描结果对恶性肿瘤和粪便污染的检测是不可靠的。这表明术前CT不能代替后续的结肠镜检查或腹腔镜灌洗后的结肠镜检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书