Hope, Optimism, and Expectations for the Political Future.

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Political Behavior Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1007/s11109-025-10027-5
Matthew Barnfield, Rob Johns
{"title":"Hope, Optimism, and Expectations for the Political Future.","authors":"Matthew Barnfield, Rob Johns","doi":"10.1007/s11109-025-10027-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Expectations of what the future holds are a significant driver of political behavior. It is therefore important to understand the sources of those expectations. In this paper, we explore the psychological dispositions driving positivity about the political future. We draw on psychologists' distinction between optimism-a dispositional belief that good things will happen, come what may-and hope-a trait of envisioning, pursuing and believing one's goals to be achievable. We assess pre-registered hypotheses about the distinct influences of optimism and hope on valence expectations-beliefs about whether there will be good or bad societal outcomes-and electoral expectations-beliefs about likely election outcomes-in a representative-sample survey experiment in the United Kingdom. We find that optimism drives positive valence expectations, but hope drives partisan electoral expectations. Indeed, partisan bias in electoral expectations is exhibited only by those scoring higher in hope. We show experimentally that positive information from polls and expert commentary dampens this impact of hope by raising the expectations of the otherwise unhopeful. Our findings suggest that so-called 'wishful thinking' about election outcomes might stem from a sense of agency around electoral politics, but that this sense of agency does not extend to how citizens envision society's prospects.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-025-10027-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":48166,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior","volume":"48 1","pages":"205-228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12904912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-025-10027-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Expectations of what the future holds are a significant driver of political behavior. It is therefore important to understand the sources of those expectations. In this paper, we explore the psychological dispositions driving positivity about the political future. We draw on psychologists' distinction between optimism-a dispositional belief that good things will happen, come what may-and hope-a trait of envisioning, pursuing and believing one's goals to be achievable. We assess pre-registered hypotheses about the distinct influences of optimism and hope on valence expectations-beliefs about whether there will be good or bad societal outcomes-and electoral expectations-beliefs about likely election outcomes-in a representative-sample survey experiment in the United Kingdom. We find that optimism drives positive valence expectations, but hope drives partisan electoral expectations. Indeed, partisan bias in electoral expectations is exhibited only by those scoring higher in hope. We show experimentally that positive information from polls and expert commentary dampens this impact of hope by raising the expectations of the otherwise unhopeful. Our findings suggest that so-called 'wishful thinking' about election outcomes might stem from a sense of agency around electoral politics, but that this sense of agency does not extend to how citizens envision society's prospects.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11109-025-10027-5.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

希望、乐观和对政治未来的期望。
对未来的预期是政治行为的重要驱动力。因此,了解这些期望的来源是很重要的。在本文中,我们探讨了心理倾向驱动积极的政治未来。我们借鉴了心理学家对乐观主义的区别——一种相信好事会发生的性格,无论发生什么——以及希望——一种设想、追求和相信自己的目标是可以实现的特质。在英国的一个代表性样本调查实验中,我们评估了关于乐观和希望对效价预期(关于是否会有好的或坏的社会结果的信念)和选举预期(关于可能的选举结果的信念)的不同影响的预登记假设。我们发现乐观驱动积极的效价预期,但希望驱动党派选举预期。事实上,只有那些希望得分更高的人才会表现出选举预期中的党派偏见。我们通过实验证明,来自民意调查和专家评论的积极信息通过提高原本无望的人的期望来抑制这种希望的影响。我们的研究结果表明,所谓的对选举结果的“一厢情愿”可能源于一种围绕选举政治的代理意识,但这种代理意识并没有延伸到公民如何设想社会前景。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址为10.1007/s11109-025-10027-5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Political Behavior
Political Behavior POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Political Behavior publishes original research in the general fields of political behavior, institutions, processes, and policies. Approaches include economic (preference structuring, bargaining), psychological (attitude formation and change, motivations, perceptions), sociological (roles, group, class), or political (decision making, coalitions, influence). Articles focus on the political behavior (conventional or unconventional) of the individual person or small group (microanalysis), or of large organizations that participate in the political process such as parties, interest groups, political action committees, governmental agencies, and mass media (macroanalysis). As an interdisciplinary journal, Political Behavior integrates various approaches across different levels of theoretical abstraction and empirical domain (contextual analysis). Officially cited as: Polit Behav
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书