Tailored circuit training and an educational programme reduce pain sensitivity in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A feasibility study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-16 DOI:10.1177/02692155261418936
Paula Jf Venturini, Marialice G da Silva, Natália A Casonato, Filipe E Sette, Enrique Lluch, Stela M Mattiello
{"title":"Tailored circuit training and an educational programme reduce pain sensitivity in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A feasibility study.","authors":"Paula Jf Venturini, Marialice G da Silva, Natália A Casonato, Filipe E Sette, Enrique Lluch, Stela M Mattiello","doi":"10.1177/02692155261418936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of tailored circuit training associated with patient education versus patient education alone in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. <b>Design:</b> randomised controlled parallel-group feasibility study. <b>Setting:</b> one centre. <b>Participants:</b> 30 participants with a clinical diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis and a primary symptom of knee pain (≥4). <b>Interventions:</b> The participants were randomly allocated to two groups for the 14-week intervention. The experimental group performed exercises three times a week and had an individualised progression of exercise duration and intensity. Both groups participated in an educational programme with health professionals. <b>Main measures:</b> feasibility and acceptability rates. Physical performance tests, muscle strength, quantitative sensory testing, and self-administered questionnaires were used to assess the impact of the interventions. <b>Results:</b> The rates of recruitment (2.73 participants/week), eligibility (31.50%), long-term retention (80% at 14 weeks and 73% at 26 weeks), and adherence to educational sessions (80% attended most lectures) were adequate, whereas the adherence to the exercise programme (60% completion of exercise sessions) was partially adequate. Acceptability and perceived usefulness were high in both groups, and the main barriers were related to accessing programmes via the Internet. Changes in physical performance tests, muscle strength, quantitative sensory testing, and self-administered questionnaires for both groups have been reported. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study demonstrated good feasibility and acceptability rates. The results will guide strategies to improve adherence and retention in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1001-1015"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155261418936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of tailored circuit training associated with patient education versus patient education alone in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Design: randomised controlled parallel-group feasibility study. Setting: one centre. Participants: 30 participants with a clinical diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis and a primary symptom of knee pain (≥4). Interventions: The participants were randomly allocated to two groups for the 14-week intervention. The experimental group performed exercises three times a week and had an individualised progression of exercise duration and intensity. Both groups participated in an educational programme with health professionals. Main measures: feasibility and acceptability rates. Physical performance tests, muscle strength, quantitative sensory testing, and self-administered questionnaires were used to assess the impact of the interventions. Results: The rates of recruitment (2.73 participants/week), eligibility (31.50%), long-term retention (80% at 14 weeks and 73% at 26 weeks), and adherence to educational sessions (80% attended most lectures) were adequate, whereas the adherence to the exercise programme (60% completion of exercise sessions) was partially adequate. Acceptability and perceived usefulness were high in both groups, and the main barriers were related to accessing programmes via the Internet. Changes in physical performance tests, muscle strength, quantitative sensory testing, and self-administered questionnaires for both groups have been reported. Conclusion: This study demonstrated good feasibility and acceptability rates. The results will guide strategies to improve adherence and retention in clinical trials.

量身定制的电路训练和教育计划可降低膝关节骨关节炎患者的疼痛敏感性:一项可行性研究。
目的:本研究的主要目的是评估与患者教育相关的定制电路训练与单独的患者教育在膝骨关节炎患者中的可行性。设计:随机对照平行组可行性研究。设置:一个中心。参与者:30名临床诊断为膝关节骨关节炎且主要症状为膝关节疼痛的参与者(≥4)。干预:参与者被随机分为两组进行为期14周的干预。实验组每周进行三次锻炼,并对锻炼时间和强度进行个性化的调整。这两个群体都参加了保健专业人员的教育方案。主要衡量指标:可行性和合格率。使用体能测试、肌肉力量、定量感觉测试和自我管理问卷来评估干预措施的影响。结果:招募率(2.73名参与者/周)、入选率(31.50%)、长期保留率(14周为80%,26周为73%)和坚持教育课程(80%参加了大多数讲座)是足够的,而坚持锻炼计划(60%完成了锻炼课程)是部分足够的。两组的可接受性和感知有用性都很高,主要障碍与通过互联网获取方案有关。两组的体能测试、肌肉力量、定量感觉测试和自我管理问卷的变化都有报道。结论:本研究具有良好的可行性和接受率。结果将指导策略,以提高依从性和保留在临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书