Comparison of Isolated Balance Exercise Regimen and Conventional Physiotherapy on Lumbar Flexion-Rotation Movement Impairment in Male Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain.

IF 1.5 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Himanshu Rakheja, Himanshu Gakhar, Pooja Anand, Priyanka Soni, Anoop Kumar Tarsoliya, Sarika Bhati
{"title":"Comparison of Isolated Balance Exercise Regimen and Conventional Physiotherapy on Lumbar Flexion-Rotation Movement Impairment in Male Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain.","authors":"Himanshu Rakheja, Himanshu Gakhar, Pooja Anand, Priyanka Soni, Anoop Kumar Tarsoliya, Sarika Bhati","doi":"10.1002/msc.70187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbopelvic Flexion-Rotation Movement Impairment Syndrome is a common pattern observed in individuals with mechanical low back pain (MLBP) characterised by altered postural control and neuromuscular dysfunction. Isolated balance training may offer focused benefits in such cases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of an isolated balance exercise regimen with conventional physiotherapy in managing Lumbopelvic flexion-rotation movement impairment syndrome in male patients with MLBP.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-centre experimental study was conducted on 30 male patients (aged 18-26 years) diagnosed with Lumbopelvic flexion-rotation movement impairment syndrome. Participants were randomly assigned to Group A (Isolated Balance Exercise) or Group B (Conventional Physiotherapy). Outcomes were assessed pre- and post-intervention using standardised pain and disability scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed statistically significant improvements. Group A showed reductions in pain (Mean = 1.86, SD = ± 0.639) and disability (Mean = 1.60, SD = ± 0.736). Group B also improved in pain (Mean = 1.66, SD = ± 0.899) and disability (Mean = 1.60, SD = ± 0.7368). The isolated balance regimen was comparably effective with conventional therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Isolated balance training is an effective and viable standalone intervention for managing MLBP due to Lumbopelvic flexion-rotation movement impairment syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"e70187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lumbopelvic Flexion-Rotation Movement Impairment Syndrome is a common pattern observed in individuals with mechanical low back pain (MLBP) characterised by altered postural control and neuromuscular dysfunction. Isolated balance training may offer focused benefits in such cases.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of an isolated balance exercise regimen with conventional physiotherapy in managing Lumbopelvic flexion-rotation movement impairment syndrome in male patients with MLBP.

Materials and methods: A single-centre experimental study was conducted on 30 male patients (aged 18-26 years) diagnosed with Lumbopelvic flexion-rotation movement impairment syndrome. Participants were randomly assigned to Group A (Isolated Balance Exercise) or Group B (Conventional Physiotherapy). Outcomes were assessed pre- and post-intervention using standardised pain and disability scales.

Results: Both groups showed statistically significant improvements. Group A showed reductions in pain (Mean = 1.86, SD = ± 0.639) and disability (Mean = 1.60, SD = ± 0.736). Group B also improved in pain (Mean = 1.66, SD = ± 0.899) and disability (Mean = 1.60, SD = ± 0.7368). The isolated balance regimen was comparably effective with conventional therapy.

Conclusion: Isolated balance training is an effective and viable standalone intervention for managing MLBP due to Lumbopelvic flexion-rotation movement impairment syndrome.

孤立平衡运动方案与常规物理疗法治疗男性机械性腰痛患者腰椎屈曲-旋转运动障碍的比较。
背景:腰盂屈曲-旋转运动障碍综合征是机械性腰痛(MLBP)患者常见的一种模式,其特征是姿势控制改变和神经肌肉功能障碍。在这种情况下,孤立的平衡训练可以提供集中的好处。目的:比较孤立平衡运动方案与常规物理治疗在治疗男性MLBP患者腰盂屈曲-旋转运动障碍综合征中的效果。材料与方法:采用单中心实验方法对30例18-26岁男性腰盂屈曲-旋转运动障碍综合征患者进行研究。参与者被随机分配到A组(孤立平衡运动)或B组(常规物理治疗)。使用标准化的疼痛和残疾量表评估干预前后的结果。结果:两组疗效均有统计学意义。A组疼痛减轻(平均= 1.86,SD =±0.639),残疾减轻(平均= 1.60,SD =±0.736)。B组疼痛(Mean = 1.66, SD =±0.899)和残疾(Mean = 1.60, SD =±0.7368)均有改善。孤立平衡疗法与常规疗法相当有效。结论:孤立平衡训练是治疗腰盂屈曲-旋转运动障碍综合征引起的MLBP的有效和可行的独立干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书