Determinants of adjuvant treatment choice between immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitor) and targeted therapy in resected stage III BRAF V600-mutated cutaneous melanoma: a multicenter observational study: MELADJ3.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Melanoma Research Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-16 DOI:10.1097/CMR.0000000000001083
Aurore Devoldere, Olivier Bouche, Coralie Barbe, Kevin Didier, Sixtine Colbach, Florence Granel Brocard, Claire Carlier
{"title":"Determinants of adjuvant treatment choice between immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitor) and targeted therapy in resected stage III BRAF V600-mutated cutaneous melanoma: a multicenter observational study: MELADJ3.","authors":"Aurore Devoldere, Olivier Bouche, Coralie Barbe, Kevin Didier, Sixtine Colbach, Florence Granel Brocard, Claire Carlier","doi":"10.1097/CMR.0000000000001083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In resected stage III BRAF V600-mutated melanoma, patients are eligible for adjuvant targeted therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but no comparative data guide this choice. Understanding factors shaping patient preferences is essential for shared decision-making. To identify factors associated with patient choice between adjuvant ICI or targeted therapy in resected stage III BRAF V600-mutated cutaneous melanoma. This multicenter, prospective, questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2024 to July 2025 across oncology centers in France concerning adults with completely resected AJCC8 stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. Patients received standardized information from their oncologist regarding two adjuvant options - anti-PD1 immunotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and targeted therapy (dabrafenib plus trametinib) - before making their treatment choice. The primary outcome was treatment selection (ICI vs. targeted therapy). Secondary outcomes consisted of describing determinants of patient decision-making using a structured questionnaire. Among 45 participants, 25 chose ICI and 20 selected targeted therapy. Questionnaire analysis showed that younger, professionally active patients with dependent children were more likely to prefer targeted therapy, valuing autonomy in treatment administration and reduced hospital visits. In contrast, older or nonworking patients more often favored ICI, citing reassurance from regular medical follow-up and the ability to delegate treatment management. Age and employment status were significantly associated with therapeutic choice. Identifying drivers of treatment preference may support more personalized adjuvant strategies. The finding that targeted therapy is favored by younger patients reinforces the relevance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in BRAF-mutated melanoma, despite expanding indications for immunotherapy in earlier stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":18550,"journal":{"name":"Melanoma Research","volume":" ","pages":"107-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melanoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000001083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In resected stage III BRAF V600-mutated melanoma, patients are eligible for adjuvant targeted therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but no comparative data guide this choice. Understanding factors shaping patient preferences is essential for shared decision-making. To identify factors associated with patient choice between adjuvant ICI or targeted therapy in resected stage III BRAF V600-mutated cutaneous melanoma. This multicenter, prospective, questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2024 to July 2025 across oncology centers in France concerning adults with completely resected AJCC8 stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. Patients received standardized information from their oncologist regarding two adjuvant options - anti-PD1 immunotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and targeted therapy (dabrafenib plus trametinib) - before making their treatment choice. The primary outcome was treatment selection (ICI vs. targeted therapy). Secondary outcomes consisted of describing determinants of patient decision-making using a structured questionnaire. Among 45 participants, 25 chose ICI and 20 selected targeted therapy. Questionnaire analysis showed that younger, professionally active patients with dependent children were more likely to prefer targeted therapy, valuing autonomy in treatment administration and reduced hospital visits. In contrast, older or nonworking patients more often favored ICI, citing reassurance from regular medical follow-up and the ability to delegate treatment management. Age and employment status were significantly associated with therapeutic choice. Identifying drivers of treatment preference may support more personalized adjuvant strategies. The finding that targeted therapy is favored by younger patients reinforces the relevance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in BRAF-mutated melanoma, despite expanding indications for immunotherapy in earlier stages.

在切除的BRAF v600突变的III期皮肤黑色素瘤中,免疫治疗(免疫检查点抑制剂)和靶向治疗之间辅助治疗选择的决定因素:一项多中心观察性研究:MELADJ3
在切除的III期BRAF v600突变黑色素瘤中,患者有资格接受辅助靶向治疗或免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs),但没有比较数据指导这种选择。了解影响患者偏好的因素对于共同决策至关重要。在切除的III期BRAF v600突变皮肤黑色素瘤中,确定与患者选择辅助ICI或靶向治疗相关的因素。这项多中心、前瞻性、基于问卷的横断面研究于2024年11月至2025年7月在法国的肿瘤中心进行,涉及完全切除AJCC8 III期BRAF v600突变黑色素瘤的成人。在做出治疗选择之前,患者从肿瘤学家那里获得了关于两种辅助治疗方案的标准化信息——抗pd1免疫治疗(nivolumab或pembrolizumab)和靶向治疗(dabrafenib + trametinib)。主要结局是治疗选择(ICI vs.靶向治疗)。次要结果包括使用结构化问卷描述患者决策的决定因素。在45名参与者中,25人选择了ICI, 20人选择了靶向治疗。问卷分析显示,年龄较小、职业活跃的有依赖儿童的患者更倾向于靶向治疗,重视治疗管理的自主权和减少住院次数。相比之下,年龄较大或不工作的患者往往更喜欢ICI,因为定期的医疗随访和委托治疗管理的能力让人放心。年龄和就业状况与治疗选择显著相关。确定治疗偏好的驱动因素可能支持更个性化的辅助策略。靶向治疗更受年轻患者的青睐,这一发现强化了braf突变黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检的相关性,尽管免疫治疗在早期阶段的适应症在扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Melanoma Research
Melanoma Research 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Melanoma Research is a well established international forum for the dissemination of new findings relating to melanoma. The aim of the Journal is to promote the level of informational exchange between those engaged in the field. Melanoma Research aims to encourage an informed and balanced view of experimental and clinical research and extend and stimulate communication and exchange of knowledge between investigators with differing areas of expertise. This will foster the development of translational research. The reporting of new clinical results and the effect and toxicity of new therapeutic agents and immunotherapy will be given emphasis by rapid publication of Short Communications. ​Thus, Melanoma Research seeks to present a coherent and up-to-date account of all aspects of investigations pertinent to melanoma. Consequently the scope of the Journal is broad, embracing the entire range of studies from fundamental and applied research in such subject areas as genetics, molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology, photobiology, pathology, immunology, and advances in clinical oncology influencing the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of melanoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书