Imaging of sub-urethral slings: State of the art.

IF 1.2
The French journal of urology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103086
Marie Florin, Edouard Poncelet, Raphaële Renard-Penna, Marc Bazot
{"title":"Imaging of sub-urethral slings: State of the art.","authors":"Marie Florin, Edouard Poncelet, Raphaële Renard-Penna, Marc Bazot","doi":"10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The mid-urethral synthetic sling (MUS) is a widely used surgical intervention for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This study aims to evaluate the complexities of diagnosing and managing complications related to MUS through various imaging techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reviews the application of different imaging modalities in patients presenting with recurrent or new symptoms following MUS surgery. The focus is on comparing the effectiveness of US and MRI in identifying the position and potential complications of pelvic slings. The use of voiding cystourethrography and CT is also discussed, although these techniques are less frequently employed due to their limited ability to directly depict mid-urethral slings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>US was found to be more effective in depicting mid-urethral slings within the urethrovaginal space, while MRI excelled in visualizing the sling arms in the retropubic space and obturator foramen. MRI was also superior in identifying infectious complications. However, both US and MRI faced challenges in distinguishing scarring from the slings and mesh.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective diagnosis and management of MUS complications require a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities. US and MRI are the primary tools, with MRI being particularly useful for detecting infectious complications and visualizing sling arms in specific anatomical regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":516865,"journal":{"name":"The French journal of urology","volume":" ","pages":"103086"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The French journal of urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fjurol.2026.103086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The mid-urethral synthetic sling (MUS) is a widely used surgical intervention for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This study aims to evaluate the complexities of diagnosing and managing complications related to MUS through various imaging techniques.

Methods: This study reviews the application of different imaging modalities in patients presenting with recurrent or new symptoms following MUS surgery. The focus is on comparing the effectiveness of US and MRI in identifying the position and potential complications of pelvic slings. The use of voiding cystourethrography and CT is also discussed, although these techniques are less frequently employed due to their limited ability to directly depict mid-urethral slings.

Results: US was found to be more effective in depicting mid-urethral slings within the urethrovaginal space, while MRI excelled in visualizing the sling arms in the retropubic space and obturator foramen. MRI was also superior in identifying infectious complications. However, both US and MRI faced challenges in distinguishing scarring from the slings and mesh.

Conclusions: Effective diagnosis and management of MUS complications require a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities. US and MRI are the primary tools, with MRI being particularly useful for detecting infectious complications and visualizing sling arms in specific anatomical regions.

尿道下吊带的成像:最新技术。
目的:尿道中合成吊带(MUS)是一种广泛应用于压力性尿失禁(SUI)的手术干预手段。本研究旨在评估通过各种成像技术诊断和处理与MUS相关的并发症的复杂性。方法:本研究回顾了不同影像方式在MUS手术后出现复发或新症状的患者中的应用。重点是比较超声和MRI在识别骨盆吊带的位置和潜在并发症方面的有效性。本文还讨论了排尿膀胱尿道造影和CT的使用,尽管这些技术由于其直接描绘尿道中吊带的能力有限而较少使用。结果:US在描述尿道阴道间隙内的尿道中吊带更有效,而MRI在耻骨后间隙和闭孔内吊带臂的可视化方面表现出色。MRI在识别感染性并发症方面也有优势。然而,在区分疤痕与吊带和网片方面,US和MRI都面临着挑战。结论:MUS并发症的有效诊断和管理需要全面了解各种成像方式的优势和局限性。US和MRI是主要的工具,MRI在检测感染性并发症和观察特定解剖区域的吊臂时特别有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书