Yulun Ma , Oli Mihalache , Arjen van Witteloostuijn , Peter Ping Li
{"title":"A state-market interplay framework for strategic knowledge management in Chinese MNEs","authors":"Yulun Ma , Oli Mihalache , Arjen van Witteloostuijn , Peter Ping Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2026.102572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The internationalization of Chinese multinational enterprises (MNEs) has triggered a rapid rise in research on their knowledge management practices. However, this literature lacks a coherent theory to explain variation in Chinese MNEs’ knowledge management strategies in and over time. In particular, we still lack an understanding of how firms navigate the unique tension between a home-country state-as-strategist and the market-led logic of global competition. To address this theoretical gap, this paper draws on a systematic review of 150 articles to develop a state-market interplay framework for the strategic knowledge management of Chinese MNEs. Our framework explains how the relationship between state-led and market-led logics generates three distinct strategic modes, each with a corresponding dominant knowledge management strategy: (1) Subordinated Interplay emphasizing knowledge acquisition; (2) Conflicting Interplay focused on knowledge transfer; and (3) Integrated Interplay concentrating on global knowledge creation. We also identify firm-level capabilities and external and internal catalysts that influence transitions between modes. The study contributes to International Business theory and the knowledge-based view by offering a typology of state–market interplay in state-capitalist economies and by explaining the institutional contingencies of firms’ knowledge strategies. We conclude by outlining avenues for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"35 3","pages":"Article 102572"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593126000168","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The internationalization of Chinese multinational enterprises (MNEs) has triggered a rapid rise in research on their knowledge management practices. However, this literature lacks a coherent theory to explain variation in Chinese MNEs’ knowledge management strategies in and over time. In particular, we still lack an understanding of how firms navigate the unique tension between a home-country state-as-strategist and the market-led logic of global competition. To address this theoretical gap, this paper draws on a systematic review of 150 articles to develop a state-market interplay framework for the strategic knowledge management of Chinese MNEs. Our framework explains how the relationship between state-led and market-led logics generates three distinct strategic modes, each with a corresponding dominant knowledge management strategy: (1) Subordinated Interplay emphasizing knowledge acquisition; (2) Conflicting Interplay focused on knowledge transfer; and (3) Integrated Interplay concentrating on global knowledge creation. We also identify firm-level capabilities and external and internal catalysts that influence transitions between modes. The study contributes to International Business theory and the knowledge-based view by offering a typology of state–market interplay in state-capitalist economies and by explaining the institutional contingencies of firms’ knowledge strategies. We conclude by outlining avenues for future research.
期刊介绍:
The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.