A state-market interplay framework for strategic knowledge management in Chinese MNEs

IF 6.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
International Business Review Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2026.102572
Yulun Ma , Oli Mihalache , Arjen van Witteloostuijn , Peter Ping Li
{"title":"A state-market interplay framework for strategic knowledge management in Chinese MNEs","authors":"Yulun Ma ,&nbsp;Oli Mihalache ,&nbsp;Arjen van Witteloostuijn ,&nbsp;Peter Ping Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2026.102572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The internationalization of Chinese multinational enterprises (MNEs) has triggered a rapid rise in research on their knowledge management practices. However, this literature lacks a coherent theory to explain variation in Chinese MNEs’ knowledge management strategies in and over time. In particular, we still lack an understanding of how firms navigate the unique tension between a home-country state-as-strategist and the market-led logic of global competition. To address this theoretical gap, this paper draws on a systematic review of 150 articles to develop a state-market interplay framework for the strategic knowledge management of Chinese MNEs. Our framework explains how the relationship between state-led and market-led logics generates three distinct strategic modes, each with a corresponding dominant knowledge management strategy: (1) Subordinated Interplay emphasizing knowledge acquisition; (2) Conflicting Interplay focused on knowledge transfer; and (3) Integrated Interplay concentrating on global knowledge creation. We also identify firm-level capabilities and external and internal catalysts that influence transitions between modes. The study contributes to International Business theory and the knowledge-based view by offering a typology of state–market interplay in state-capitalist economies and by explaining the institutional contingencies of firms’ knowledge strategies. We conclude by outlining avenues for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":"35 3","pages":"Article 102572"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593126000168","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The internationalization of Chinese multinational enterprises (MNEs) has triggered a rapid rise in research on their knowledge management practices. However, this literature lacks a coherent theory to explain variation in Chinese MNEs’ knowledge management strategies in and over time. In particular, we still lack an understanding of how firms navigate the unique tension between a home-country state-as-strategist and the market-led logic of global competition. To address this theoretical gap, this paper draws on a systematic review of 150 articles to develop a state-market interplay framework for the strategic knowledge management of Chinese MNEs. Our framework explains how the relationship between state-led and market-led logics generates three distinct strategic modes, each with a corresponding dominant knowledge management strategy: (1) Subordinated Interplay emphasizing knowledge acquisition; (2) Conflicting Interplay focused on knowledge transfer; and (3) Integrated Interplay concentrating on global knowledge creation. We also identify firm-level capabilities and external and internal catalysts that influence transitions between modes. The study contributes to International Business theory and the knowledge-based view by offering a typology of state–market interplay in state-capitalist economies and by explaining the institutional contingencies of firms’ knowledge strategies. We conclude by outlining avenues for future research.
中国跨国公司战略知识管理的国家-市场相互作用框架
随着中国跨国企业的国际化,对其知识管理实践的研究迅速兴起。然而,这些文献缺乏一个连贯的理论来解释中国跨国公司的知识管理策略在时间和时间上的变化。特别是,我们仍然缺乏对企业如何在母国作为战略家和市场主导的全球竞争逻辑之间的独特紧张关系中导航的理解。为了解决这一理论缺口,本文系统回顾了150篇文章,为中国跨国公司的战略知识管理开发了一个国家-市场相互作用框架。我们的框架解释了国家主导和市场主导逻辑之间的关系如何产生三种不同的战略模式,每种模式都有相应的主导知识管理战略:(1)强调知识获取的从属相互作用;(2)以知识转移为中心的冲突相互作用;(3)以全球知识创造为中心的一体化互动。我们还确定了企业层面的能力以及影响模式之间转换的外部和内部催化剂。该研究通过提供国家资本主义经济中国家-市场相互作用的类型学和解释企业知识战略的制度偶然性,为国际商务理论和知识基础观点做出了贡献。最后,我们概述了未来研究的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书